The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

1.5 tesla scanner

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States

The 1.5 Tesla scanner is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) device that generates a strong magnetic field and radio waves to create detailed images of the body's internal structures. It is designed to provide high-quality diagnostic imaging for a variety of medical applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

30 protocols using 1.5 tesla scanner

1

Structural Brain Imaging in Childhood and Adolescence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subjects were scanned during childhood and adolescence using a GE 1.5 Tesla scanner located at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Magnetic Resonance Research Center. After a localizer scan to ensure optimal head placement, T1 weighted axial images with a slice thickness of 1.5 mm were obtained using a 3 dimensional spoiled gradient recalled echo in the steady state (3D SPGR) (TE = 5 ms, TR = 24 ms, flip angle = 45 degrees, acquisition matrix = 192 × 256, NEX = 1, FOV = 24 cm). Slices were resliced in the coronal plane through the anterior commissures to provide a reproducible guide for image orientation. In addition, axial proton density and T2 weighted images were obtained covering the whole brain at a slice thickness of 5 mm, slice gap = 0 mm ([double spin echo, TE = 17 ms and 102 ms, TR = 3000ms], acquisition matrix = 256 × 192, NEX = 1, FOV = 24 cm). All scans were reviewed by a neuroradiologist when suspected structural abnormalities were present.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

MRI Measures of Brain Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MRI components of this study are reported separately [19 (link)]. Briefly, all scans were acquired using a General Electric 1.5 Tesla scanner in the Diagnostic Imaging Sciences Center at the University of Washington. MRI was used to measure the size (volumes and/or midsagittal areas) of the following structures: total brain, frontal lobe, caudate, putamen hippocampus, corpus callosum, and cerebellar vermis. These outcomes served as the primary dependent variables for brain structure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

MRI-Based Adipose and Muscle Tissue Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The participants lay in prone position with their arms placed straight overhead in a 1.5 Tesla scanner (GE, Milwaukee, WI). MRI images were obtained with a T1-weighted, spin-echo sequence with a 210-ms repetition time and a 17-ms echo time. The details of the MRI protocol are described elsewhere (37 (link), 38 (link)). A total of approximately 40 images with a slice thickness of 1 cm were acquired from each participant. The MRI data were analyzed using a semi-automatic software program for segmentation (Tomovision, Montreal, PQ). This software program allowed for the discrimination between adipose and muscle tissues based on their gray-level histogram output and a watershed algorithm for the selection of VAT. After segmentation a highly trained analyst specialized in tissular anatomy visually inspected and edited all images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Resting-state fMRI Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI images were acquired in a General Electric 1.5 Tesla scanner (General Electric Medical Systems, Miwaukee, WI, USA) with a homogeneous birdcage head coil. The participants lay supine with their heads snugly fixed by a belt and pads were used to minimize head motion. Resting-state functional images (T2* weighted images) were obtained by gradient-recalled echo-planar imaging (GRE-EPI) sequence: number of slices = 30, thickness = 4.0 mm, gap = 0 mm, in-plane resolution = 3.75 × 3.75 mm2, TR = 3,000 ms, TE = 40 ms, flip angle = 90°, acquisition matrix = 64 × 64, FOV = 240 × 240 mm. This acquisition sequence generated 142 volumes in 7 min and 6 s. In addition, three-dimensional T1-weighted axial images covering the whole brain were obtained using a spoiled gradient echo (SPGR) sequence: TR = 9.9 ms, TE = 2.1 ms, thickness = 2.0 mm, gap = 0 mm, flip angle = 15°, FOV = 240 × 240 mm, acquisition matrix = 256 × 192. Participants were instructed to keep their eyes closed, bodies aplanatic and not to think systematically or fall asleep during the scanning.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Myocardial Fibrosis using CMR Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CMR imaging was performed with a 1.5 Tesla scanner (GE). Delayed-enhancement images for detection of fibrosis were obtained 10 minutes after intravenous administration of gadolinium–DTPA (0.2 mmol/kg) [25] (link). Total of 6 short axis images were analyzed to qualify and quantify LGE. LGE was defined by a signal intensity of > 6 standard deviations above normal myocardium [26] (link). The LGE area was measured by manual planimetry using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland) in each short-axis image [27] (link). The area of the left ventricle was determined by manually tracing epicardial and endocardial borders in each short-axis image. The percentage area of LGE was then calculated by dividing the sum of the LGE areas by that of the total left ventricular area [27] (link). Data were presented both as percentage of the left ventricular area and as a binomial variable; positive/negative (Figures 1E and F). CMR data were analyzed by 2 experienced investigators (E.M., Y.N.) with consensus without knowledge of the clinical information of the patients.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Brain MRI Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brain imaging was performed with a 1.5-Tesla scanner (General Electric Healthcare, Milwaukee, USA, software version 11x) with an eight-channel head coil and included T1-weighted, T2*-weighted, proton-density-weighted and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequences (Ikram et al., 2011 (link)). Gray matter, white matter and white matter lesion volumes were quantified by a validated automatic tissue classification technique based on a k-nearest neighbor classifying algorithm using T1-weighted, proton density weighted and FLAIR scans (de Boer et al., 2009 (link), Vrooman et al., 2007 (link)). Next to global gray and white matter volumes, we also investigated gray and white matter volumes of the frontal, parietal, temporal and occipital lobes separately. Intracranial volume was calculated by summing gray matter, white matter, white matter lesions and cerebrospinal fluid volumes. Segmentation of the amygdala, hippocampus and thalamus was performed by FreeSurfer version 4.5 (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/) (Erpelding et al., 2012 (link)). FreeSurfer was used with the default parameters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

BOLD Contrast Neuroimaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We acquired T2*-weighted echo spiral in/out images with blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) contrast using a 1.5 tesla scanner (GE Medical Systems). Each volume comprised of 26 interleaved, axial slices of 4 mm thickness and 3.5 mm in-plane resolution, using the following parameters: TR=2000 ms, TE=35 ms, flip angle=84°, FOV=192 mm, 64×64 matrix. For each subject a total number of 600 volumes were obtained, 300 in each learning task run, corresponding to 10 minutes of scanning for each run. Additionally, a single high resolution T1-weighted structural image (spoiled gradient echo sequence (SPGR)) was acquired for each patient at the beginning of the on drug scan session, prior to performing the on drug learning task runs of the experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Cerebellar Lobe Volumetric Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subjects were scanned on a GE 1.5 Tesla scanner in the Department of Radiology MR Research Center. T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and axial proton density images were obtained, as previously described [21 (link)]. Regions of interest were drawn using BRAINS2 [39 (link)], a program that uses a semiautomated segmentation approach to provide reliable and valid structural volumetric measurements. Two raters who were blind to subject identity and risk group status traced the volumes of the cerebellar lobes and intracranial volume (ICV) according to the guidelines established by Pierson et al. [40 (link)]. The anterior, inferior posterior, and superior posterior lobes were traced along with the corpus medullare. The corpus medullare consists of the central white matter and the output nuclei of the cerebellum. Deep within the corpus medullare, these small gray matter nuclei provide much of the output of the cerebellum (Fig. 1).

Regions of interest traces are shown in the sagittal plane. Measured ROIs included the anterior, superior posterior, and inferior posterior lobes and the corpus medullare. Figure from Pierson et al. [40 (link)]. The yellow Xs (oval cluster) represent the outline of the corpus medullare with the remaining yellow Xs indicating the horizontal fissure

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

BOLD Contrast Neuroimaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We acquired T2*-weighted echo spiral in/out images with blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) contrast using a 1.5 tesla scanner (GE Medical Systems). Each volume comprised of 26 interleaved, axial slices of 4 mm thickness and 3.5 mm in-plane resolution, using the following parameters: TR=2000 ms, TE=35 ms, flip angle=84°, FOV=192 mm, 64×64 matrix. For each subject a total number of 600 volumes were obtained, 300 in each learning task run, corresponding to 10 minutes of scanning for each run. Additionally, a single high resolution T1-weighted structural image (spoiled gradient echo sequence (SPGR)) was acquired for each patient at the beginning of the on drug scan session, prior to performing the on drug learning task runs of the experiment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Automated Brain MRI Segmentation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brain MRI data were acquired with a 1.5-Tesla scanner (GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) using an eight-channel head coil during a 30-min brain imaging protocol that was previously described in detail (Ikram et al. 2011 (link); Jones et al. 1999 (link)). Two trained technicians performed all examinations in a standardized way. This protocol included high-resolution axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), T1-weighted, and T2-weighted sequences. The T1-weighted image was used for amygdala segmentation and consisted of a 3D spoiled gradient-recalled echo (SPGR) scan, with voxel volume of 0.49 × 0.49 × 0.80 mm3. Automatic segmentation of subcortical brain structures, including the amygdala and hippocampus left and right, was performed on T1-weighted images using Freesurfer software (version 4.5.0) (FreeSurfer 2013 ). This rendered volumetric measures of gray matter (in mm3). Exact processing details are described elsewhere (Reuter et al. 2012 (link); Desikan et al. 2006 (link); Fischl et al. 2002 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!