The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

27 protocols using hitrap q column

1

Glycoprotein Structure Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flagellar glycoprotein sample was digested with a large excess of proteinase K in 0.01 M TRIS-HCl buffer at pH 8 at 37°C for 48 h. The products of digestion or free oligosaccharides were separated on Bio-Gel P6 column (2.5 × 60 cm) and each fraction which eluted before the salt peak was dried and analysed by 1H NMR. Fractions containing sugars were separated by anion exchange chromatography on Hitrap Q column (5 ml size, Amersham) and the glycans eluted with a linear gradient of NaCl (0–1 M, 1 h). Desalting was performed on Sephadex G15 prior to analysis by NMR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Purification and Characterization of Carbohydrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gel chromatography was performed on a Sephadex G-15 column (1.5×60 cm) or a Biogel P6 column (2.5×60 cm) in pyridine-acetic acid buffer (4 mL:10 mL:1 L water), and monitored by refractive index detector (Gilson). Anion exchange chromatography was done on an Hitrap Q column (2×5 mL size, Amersham), with UV monitoring at 220 nm in a linear gradient of NaCl (0–1 M, 1 h) at the 3 mL/min. Fractions of 1 min were collected and additionally tested for carbohydrates, by spotting on an SiO2 TLC plate, dipping them in 5% H2SO4 in EtOH and heating with a heat-gun. All fractions of interest were dried in a Savant drying centrifuge and 1H spectra were recorded for each fraction without desalting. For 2D NMR, desalting was performed on a Sephadex G15 column.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Protein Purification by Ion Exchange

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample up to 50 mg was
injected into a HiTrap Q column (Amersham, two columns, by 5 mL each,
connected in series) in water at 3 mL·min–1, washed with water for 5 min, and then eluted with a linear gradient
from water to 1 M aqueous NaCl over 1 h with UV detection at 220 nm
and spot test on silica TLC plate with development by dipping in 5%
H2SO4 in ethanol and heating with heat gun until
brown spots become visible. Samples were desalted on Sephadex G-15
column (1.6 × 60 cm2) in 1% aqueous AcOH with a refractive
index detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ni-free Purification of WT and TTE(Δ100)

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We previously found that the active site of WT was occupied by Ni2+ ions taken up by nickel‐nitrilotriacetic acid affinity chromatography (Ni‐NTA) during purification [10 (link)]. Therefore, to investigate metal dependency, we avoided the use of Ni‐NTA to purify WT and TTEΔ100.
Proteins from sonicated and heat‐treated solutions of recombinant E. coli were separated by AEX on a HiTrap Q column (Cytiva). The fusion tag was cleaved using PreScission protease (Takara Bio). Separation of the WT and the fusion tag was performed by AEX using a HiTrap Q column. The final purification step was size‐exclusion chromatography (SEC) using a HiLoad 26/600 Superdex 75 prep‐grade column (Cytiva).
Proteins from sonicated and heat‐treated solutions of recombinant E. coli were precipitated by a 40% saturation concentration of the ammonium sulfate fraction. The next purification step was AEX, using a HiTrap Q column. The separation of TTEΔ100 and the fusion tag was performed by HIC using a HiTrap Butyl HP column. The final purification step was SEC using a HiLoad 26/600 Superdex 75 prep‐grade column. Purified WT and TTEΔ100 were dialyzed overnight in the presence of 50 mm EDTA to remove metal ions, and the solvent was substituted with 50 mm sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) containing 150 mm NaCl.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Optimized Cell-Free Synthesis of scFv and Fv-Clasp

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The scFv fragments fused with N-terminal N11-tag and TEV protease recognition sequences were expressed in an E. coli cell-free protein synthesis system as described above with the following exception: the synthesis mixture included 5 mM glutathione disulfide and 0.4 mg/mL disulfide-bond isomerase (DsbC) without reducing agent at 25°C. The synthesized proteins were purified by using the HisTrap column and then digested with TEV protease (47 (link)) and dialyzed against the same buffer including 20 mM imidazole, followed by a second HisTrap chromatography to remove cleaved His-tag and the His-tagged TEV protease. The desalted protein solution in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.0) containing 80 mM NaCl was subjected to a HiTrap SP column (Cytiva) and eluted with a 0–1.0 M NaCl gradient. Eluted proteins were concentrated to 7 mg/mL.
The Fv-clasp fragments (27 (link)) derived from the CV-1A1 scFv with N-terminal N11-tag and TEV protease recognition sequences were prepared in the same manner as described above, except the synthesis mixture included 5 mM glutathione disulfide, 0.8 mg/mL DsbC, and 0.2 mg/mL Skp chaperone protein without reducing agent, and a HiTrap Q column (Cytiva) was used instead of a HiTrap SP column.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Chiba P Domain Protein Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Chiba P domain protein was expressed as N11-tagged SUMO fusions in an in vitro E. coli cell-free protein synthesis system (48 (link)). The fusion protein was immobilized by a HisTrap column (Cytiva, Piscataway, NJ), washed with 20 mM imidazole, and then eluted with 500 mM imidazole in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) containing 0.5 M NaCl. Fusion proteins were digested by SUMO protease while dialyzing against the same buffer including 20 mM imidazole, followed by a second HisTrap chromatography. The resultant flowthrough fraction containing cleaved P domain proteins was desalted by using a HiPrep Desalting column (Cytiva) [in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) containing 10 mM NaCl] and then subjected to anion exchange chromatography using a HiTrapQ column (Cytiva). The P domain protein was eluted by applying a NaCl gradient. The peak fraction was concentrated by using an Amicon Ultra 15 centrifugal device (MWCO 10,000) (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA) to a protein concentration of approximately 1 mg/mL in 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Protein Purification and Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NAD, NMN, Digitonin, Poly-L-lysine, KH2PO4, NH4HCO3, chloroacetamide, polyethylenimine (PEI), and urea were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. DMEM, Trypsin-EDTA, penicillin/streptomycin solution, Lipofectamine 2000, formic acid, and acetonitrile were purchased from Thermo Fisher. FBS was obtained from PAN Biotech. SMM-293TII media was obtained from Sino Biological. Ni-Excel column, HiTrap Q column, CM5 sensor were obtained from Cytiva. Strep-Tactin resin, StrepTactinTM XT SPR kit were obtained from IBA. General chemicals were purchased from Aladdin, Macklin, or Sangon Biotech (Shanghai).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Purification of Recombinant Sucrose Synthase

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells collected after induction were let thaw on ice and resuspended in 50 mL/L culture binding buffer (50 mM Na-phosphate, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, pH 8.0). The cell suspension was subjected to 4 cycles of sonication/rest of 2 min each at 80% power, keeping the solution on ice all the time. After cell disruption, cellular debris were removed by centrifugation followed by filtration using a 0.22 μm filter. Cleared cell extract was applied to a 5 mL HisTrap column (Cytiva Europe, Milan, Italy) equilibrated in binding buffer. Protein elution was obtained by an imidazole step gradient from 0 mM to 500 mM. Eluted proteins were checked by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis in reducing conditions. Fractions positive for sdASNase were pooled and applied to a HiTrap Desalting column (Cytiva Europe, Milan, Italy) equilibrated in 50 mM Na-phosphate pH 7.4. The obtained fractions were loaded onto a 1 mL HiTrap Q column (Cytiva Europe, Milan, Italy) equilibrated in 50 mM Na-phosphate pH 7.4. Protein elution was obtained by a linear NaCl gradient and the fractions obtained, along with the flow-through, were analyzed by electrophoresis in reducing conditions, as previously described [24 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Purified REV7 Mutant Purification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified REV7 mutants at 500 µg in total were subjected to anion-exchange (AE) chromatography using a 1 ml Hi-Trap Q column (Cytiva). Protein samples were resuspended in low salt buffer B prior loading onto Q column. Bound proteins were eluted using a 20–500 mM NaCl gradient over 20 column volumes. Fractions collected from the run were analyzed by 12% SDS-PAGE.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

FUS LCR Purification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We modified the purification to more reliably obtain FUS or mutant FUS LCRN without the SUMO fusion tag. Nickel affinity chromatography and size exclusion chromatography were followed by consecutive purification on a HiTrap Q column (Cytiva) and an 8 ml phenyl Superose column (Cytiva) using buffer with 40 mM arginine, pH 9 and gradients from 50 mM to 1M NaCl and 1 M to 0 M NaCl, respectively. Following cleavage with ULP1 the protein was again purified by phenyl Superose using the same gradient, to yield highly pure FUS LCRN.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

  Request a quote for « Hitrap q column »