The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Somatom definition ct scanner

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in Germany

The Somatom Definition CT scanner is a computed tomography (CT) imaging device manufactured by Siemens. It is designed to capture high-quality, three-dimensional images of the human body for medical diagnosis and analysis purposes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using somatom definition ct scanner

1

Quantitative CT-based Assessment of Hip Bone Density

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT scans of subjects’ hip joints were performed on a 64-row Siemens Somatom Definition CT scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with a Mindways calibrated body model (Mindways Software Inc., Austin, Texas, USA). The acquisition parameters were as follows: 120 kV; 217 mAs; pitch of 1.2; reconstruction slice thickness of 1 mm; reconstruction field of view 50 cm; and medium reconstruction kernel (B40f). The scanning range was 1 cm above the femoral head to 3 cm below the lesser trochanter. The subjects’ knees were flat, and their feet were rotated inwards to reduce overlap between the proximal femur and the acetabulum on the 2D projected image. This study analyzed hip CT scans using the commercial QCTPro (Mindways Inc., Austin, Texas, USA) CTXA module. Three standard DXA hip ROIs were generated, namely, FN, TR, and IT, and DXA equivalent aBMD results of each ROI were obtained. The FN ROI was a narrow frame 10 or 15 mm wide to avoid the overlap between the acetabulum and FN in 2D projection images (Figure 3). In the present study, the World Health Organization (WHO) BMD criteria for osteoporosis were used as follows: osteoporosis was defined by a BMD T-score of -2.5 or less at the FN or total hip; osteopenia was defined by a BMD T-score between -1.0 and -2.5 at the FN or total hip; and normal was defined by a BMD T-score of -1 or more at the FN or total hip.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative CT Analysis of Cadaveric Femora

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Forty-four fresh frozen, transplant grade cadaveric femora were obtained from 44 individual donors (Table 1). The specimens were selected from a larger cohort of 100 cadaveric specimens based on femoral neck areal bone mineral density (aBMD) T-score (GE Lunar iDXA, GE Healthcare Inc., Madison, WI) such that the sample uniformly covered the range from osteoporotic to normal. All specimens were thawed to room temperature and scanned in air for maximum contrast using a Siemens Somatom Definition CT scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany). Each femur was scanned twice in the same position using two distinct QCT protocols for model comparison (Fig. 1).
A QCT scanning phantom (Mindways Inc., Austin, TX, USA) was placed in the field of view to convert Hounsfield units (HU) to equivalent K2HPO4 density, assumed to be equal to bone ash density (Cong et al. 2011 (link)):
ρash=ρK2HPO4=9103+7104HU
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Helical TomoTherapy for Locally Advanced Lung Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Seventeen patients with non-small cell lung cancer who previously underwent Helical TomoTherapy (HT) at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital were selected. Pretreatment 4DCT data were obtained for all patients to determine the internal margin of the clinical. Patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Planning CT and 4DCT scans were performed using a Siemens SOMATOM Definition CT scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with a 5 mm slice thickness covering the entire chest. The following standard scan parameters were used: 120 kVp, 120 mA, 0.80.8 pixel spacing.

Baseline characteristics of 17 patients with locally advanced lung cancer

CharacteristicValue
Sex
 Male14
 Female3
Age (years)
 Median (range)67 (47–89)
Stage
 III5
 IV12
Tumor location
 Right upper lobe5
 Right lower lobe4
 Left upper lobe6
 Left lower lobe2
PTV volume (cm3)
 Median (range)167.8 (38.24–396.89)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Detailed CT Analysis of Keel Bone Fractures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT scanning of 62 keel bones with remaining soft tissues (intact muscles and fasciae) was performed using a Siemens Somatom Definition CT scanner with the following settings: 120 kV, 300 mAs, slice thickness 0.6cm, pitch 0.35 cm, slice increment 0.2 cm and a sharp reconstruction algorithm (H70h). A constant field of view of 17cm was used, resulting in a pixel size of 0.34 cm.
Mimics software, version 18 (Materialise Inc., Leuven, Belgium), was used to visualize the CT images and to generate 3D models of the keen bones. 3D models of the bone were generated using automatic segmentation applying a Hounsfield unit (HU) range from 226 to 3071.
The assessor carrying out both the CT scans, 3D modelling and evaluation of the observations obtained was blinded to any information related to both origin, age, and macroscopic findings. The fractures were assessed both from the CT images and the 3D models. For localization of the fractures the keel was divided into three sections (Fig 2) [29 ]
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Pediatric Chest CT with Contrast

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A free breathing contrast-enhanced chest CT scan was acquired within the first year of life using a standardised protocol. The majority of scans (18/21) were acquired on an Emotion 6 CT scanner (Siemens Healthcare), 2/21 were acquired on a SOMATOM Definition CT scanner (Siemens Healthcare), and 1/21 was acquired on a Lightspeed QX/i CT scanner (GE Healthcare). The following range of parameters applies, with differences caused by changes in CT protocols over the years: tube load 20–101 mAs, kilovoltage peak 80–120 kV, field-of-view 103–214 mm, slice thickness 0.75–2.5 mm, kernel B30s–B75f. In 90% of patients, a split bolus contrast enhancement protocol was used with both arterial and venous contrast enhancement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multimodal Imaging Evaluation of Pediatric Pancreatitis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Computed tomography (CT) examinations were performed with 3 different CT scanners: a 16-slice GE Optima 540 CT system (General Electric Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis, USA), a 16-slice Somatom Emotion CT system (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), and a 64-slice dual-source Somatom Definition CT scanner (Siemens). Postcontrast abdominal CT images were obtained at the venous phase after intravenous contrast injection.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations were performed with 3 different 1.5 Tesla MR scanners; Philips Achieva dStream (Koninklijke Philips N.V., Nederland), Siemens Symphony TIM (Siemens), and Siemens Aera (Siemens). The routine abdominal MRI protocol for pancreatitis in all scanner consisted of coronal T2-weighted, axial T2-weighted, axial T2-weighted fat-suppressed, dual-echo gradient T1-weighted, 3-dimensional MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), diffusion-weighted imaging, pre-contrast interpolated gradient echo T1-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced (arterial phase, portal venous phase, and 5-min delayed phase) T1-weighted images. Due to the prominent difference in size of our patient cohort, between 1 and 18 years old, field-of-view was adjusted in each examination according to the patient’s size, ranging from 380-280 to 285-160 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Standardized Cranial CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All NECT images were carried out on SIEMENS SOMATOM definition CT scanner. The
scanning was performed using a standard clinical protocol with an axial
technique of 2.4-mm section thickness and reconstruction interval, and with a
scanning energy of 120 kVp tube voltage. The image matrix size was 512 × 512.
The scan ranged from the skull base to the cranium, with a thickness of 3 mm per
layer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comprehensive Hip Joint Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
With IRB approval (#51053) and informed consent, one male with no history of hip pain or pathology was imaged (32 years old, 177 cm, 73 kg, BMI 23.3). An orthopaedic surgeon performed the three exams (Figure 6). 280 ± 5 frames were collected per exam. Radiation settings were 87 kVp/3.3 mA (fluoro 1) and 88 kVp/3.4 mA (fluoro 2). CT images of the entire pelvis, proximal femur, and knee were acquired with a Siemens SOMATOM Definition CT Scanner (0.7 mm slice thickness, 355 mm FOV, 512 × 512 matrix) and bones were segmented with Amira. Model-based tracking and filtering of results was completed as described above. Outcome measures included joint angles, translations, bone-bone distance, and videos of bone motion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multimodal Imaging Protocol for Oncology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Contrast-enhanced full-dose CT from the neck to the pelvis was performed with oral and intravenous contrast material and a slice thickness of 2 mm for the body and 1 mm for the neck on a multislice Somatom Definition CT scanner (at least a 64-slice scanner; Siemens/ CTI). Planar whole-body BS was performed 2.5-4 h after intravenous injection of 500 6 10% MBq of 99m Tc-diphosphonate on a doublehead g-camera (a Symbia S, a T2, or a T16; all Siemens/CTI) equipped with a low-energy, high-resolution collimator. 18 F-FDG PET/CT was performed 1 h after the intravenous administration of a 3 MBq/kg dose of 18 F-FDG from the head to the upper thigh at 1-3 min per bed position on a Biograph mCT PET/CT system (either a 40-or a 64-slice CT scanner) (Siemens/CTI), accredited by European Association of Nuclear Medicine Research Limited. Scan acquisition and reconstructions were performed following the recommendations of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine guideline for oncologic 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging (20) . Before the PET acquisition, the patients underwent a low-dose CT scan during tidal breathing for attenuation correction (80-140 kVp; quality reference, 30 mAs; pitch, 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

CT Scanning of Forensic Specimen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The specimen LP-UFC 722 was scanned using a Siemens Somatom Definition CT scanner, at the Department of Forensic Medicine, University of Copenhagen. After chemical/mechanical preparation, the entire specimen was scanned with the following settings: 140 kV, 550 mAs, 0.6 mm slice thinness, 0.4 pitch, 0.3 slice increment and a sharp reconstruction algorithm (H70h). A field of view of 182 mm was used resulting in images with a pixel size of 0.35 mm.
A detailed scanning of the skull was also performed using the same settings, but reducing the field of view to 93 mm. The resulted pixel size of the CT images was 0.18 mm. The CT scanning data processed using the image software Mimics (Materialise) version 12. A 3D model of the skull was created by using data segmentation methods described by Lynnerup (2007) and Villa & Lynnerup (2012) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!