The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Automated dna sequencer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Automated DNA Sequencer is a laboratory instrument designed to automate the process of determining the genetic sequence of DNA samples. It performs the various steps involved in DNA sequencing, including sample preparation, electrophoresis, and data analysis, in a highly efficient and standardized manner.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

25 protocols using automated dna sequencer

1

Vibrio Multiplex PCR Purification and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each amplified PCR product was purified from agarose gels using the QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany) and by QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen). The sequencing of purified PCR products was performed using an automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) using the forward and reverse primers used in the Vibrio multiplex PCR. The sequencing data was compared with the known targeted gene sequences which were originally used for specific-primer design for each Vibrio species.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

HPV DNA Detection and Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A viral kit for DNA extraction (Promega Maxwell) was used. β-globin polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with the primers PCO3 and PCO4 was carried out on all samples to ensure the presence of human DNA and that no PCR-inhibiting agents were present.27 (link) All samples were analyzed with a nested PCR system (MY09/11) and GP5+/6+ that detects most mucosal HPV types and all high-risk HPV types that have oncogenic potential in mucosal tissue.28 ,29 (link) All HPV-positive DNA samples were sequenced to confirm viral DNA sequences. For sequencing, HPV-positive PCR products were purified with a PCR purification kit in a magnetic 96-ring SPRIplate (Agencourt Biosciences). Sequencing reactions were performed containing the purified PCR products together with GP+ primer and BigDye Terminator. Sequence reactions were purified with a dye-terminator removal kit (Agencourt Biosciences) in a magnetic 96-ring SPRIplate. Direct sequencing was conducted, and sequence reactions were analyzed with an automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems). The DNA sequences were compared with available sequences in GenBank through the National Center for Biotechnology Information BLASTn suite server.30 Participants with β-globin–positive saliva samples were included in the data analysis. (β-globin is a DNA integrity check; any samples with negative β-globin were invalid.)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transcriptome Analysis of Silkworm Midgut

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5′ and 3′ RACE analyses were performed using the GeneRacer kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Total RNA was extracted from three midguts of day three of the fifth instar silkworm larvae using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), followed by treatment of RNase-free DNase I (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA) for 30 min at 37 °C to eliminate the contaminating genomic DNA. The purity of extracted RNA was determined by UV spectrophotometer. Four μg of RNA was reverse-transcribed to the first strand of cDNA using M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 1 h at 42 °C. In order to obtain the full-length cDNA of the BmCDA7, specific primers were designed by primer 5 (Table S4), and then the procedure was performed using the GeneRacer kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All the PCR products were electrophoresed on 2% agarose gels containing ethidium bromide and photographed under UV illumination. cDNA fragments were extracted from agarose gels, purified using a agarose gel purification kit (Axygen, Union City, CA, USA), and cloned to pEASY-T1 simple vector (TransGen, Beijing, China). The cloned product was sequenced using automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems 3730, Shanghai, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Yeast Plasmid DNA Transformation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Yeast plasmid DNA was recovered and used to transform E. coli XL1-Blue. Plasmid DNA was obtained from each resulting bacterial colony and digested with the restriction enzyme HindIII (NEB, Ipswich, USA) to identify the corresponding library plasmids. DNA sequence analysis was performed using an Automated DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, USA) using the GAL4-AD primer - TACCACTACAATGGATG (Enzifarma, Clontech, Portugal). The DNA sequences obtained were compared to the GenBank DB, using the BLAST algorithm, to identify the corresponding encoded proteins.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

PCR Sequencing of 52 Exons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PCR conditions for 52 exons were standardized and directly sequenced using an automated DNA Sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster city, USA). Nucleotide numbering is as per Human Genome Variation society (HGVS) nomenclature (http://www.hgvs.org/mutnomen/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Mitochondrial D-loop Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The entire mitochondrial D-loop region (np15416-16313) was screened by PCR-Sanger’s sequencing analysis using specific primers (Table 1) as described earlier [16] . PCR amplicons of 432 bp (primer set 1) and 519 bp were subjected to gel-purification and sequences were obtained by direct sequencing technique using an automated DNA-sequencer (Applied BioSystems, USA).
For mutational analysis, the mtDNA sequence of all experimental animals was compared with the reference mtDNA sequence (wistar rat strain BBDP/Rhw; Acc. No. FJ919760). Sequences were aligned using CLUSTAL-X software and mutations were scored as described earlier [17] (link). Impact of identified mutations on D-loop secondary structures was assessed by DNA mfold web server.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Proviral Sequencing of Primary CD4+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary CD4+ T cells were prepared by negative selection from macaque PBMCs using a non-human primate CD4+ T cell isolation kit (Miltenyi). Total cellular DNA was extracted from CD4+ T cells using DNeasy extraction kit (QIAGEN). The DNA corresponding to the number of CD4+ T cells indicated in S1 Table was subjected to nested PCR amplification of proviral gag, vif, and nef cDNA fragments (nucleotide numbers [nt] 1231–2958 for gag, nt 4829–7000 for vif, and nt 8677–10196 for nef in SIVmac239 [accession number M33263]) for direct sequencing using dye terminator chemistry and an automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems) as previously described [25 (link)]. For macaques R06-037, R05-005, R07-001, and R07-006 at 2 years, total cellular DNAs were extracted not directly from CD4+ T cells but after 8 days of culture described below. Dominant non-synonymous mutations were determined. For virus recovery, 0.5–2 x 106 CD4+ T cells were cultured in the presence of 10 ng/ml human interleukin-7 (IL-7) (Miltenyi) and 10 ng/ml human IL-15 (Miltenyi) for 8 days. Then, viral RNA was extracted from supernatants of CD4+ T-cell culture using the High Pure Viral RNA kit (Roche Diagnostics) and subjected to reverse transcription and nested PCR (RT-PCR) amplification of viral gag cDNA fragments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Identification and Phylogenetic Analysis of Rice SUMO Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequencing of the candidate region: The expected PCR band was purified using a Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen Inc., Chatsworth, California, CA, USA) and sequenced using an automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, California, CA, USA). Six rice SUMO genes have been reported [18 (link),38 (link)]; we obtained their sequences from the Rice Annotation Project (http://rapdb.dna.affrc.go.jp/, accessed on 6 October 2021). Known protein/DNA sequences were used as search queries to BLAST against rice sequence databases to determine if the rice genome encodes additional SUMO proteins. Arabidopsis AtSUMO sequences were obtained from TAIR (http://www.arabidopsis.org, accessed on 6 October 2021), while human and yeast SUMO sequences were obtained from the NCBI database. Sequences were aligned using ClustalW and then searched for conserved domains using the Pfam database [39 (link),40 (link)]. Protein sequences alignment was performed using ClustalX software (http://www.clustal.org/, accessed on 6 October 2021). Phylogenetic tree analysis was carried out using the neighbor-joining method, PHYLIP version 3.69 (http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html, accessed on 6 October 2021), with bootstrap values from 1000 neighbor-joining bootstrap replicates. The candidate gene-coding region was investigated to define the SUMO features.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cloning and Sequencing of PCR Fragments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PCR fragments were isolated from the agarose gel and purified using DiaSpin DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Shanghai Sangon Biological Engineering Technology & Services Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China). Next, the fragments were cloned into a pEASY®-T5 zero cloning vector according to the manufacturer’s protocol (TransGen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Using the following plasmid as target template, PCR amplification was performed with vector primers M13F (5′-GTAAAACGACGGCCAGT-3′) and M13R (5′- CAGGAAACAGCTATGAC-3′). PCR products were sequenced by an automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). DNA base composition was analyzed by a BLAST search against the NCBI nucleotide database.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Sequencing and Comparative Analysis of QRDR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sequencing was carried out using an automated DNA sequencer and data collection software from Applied Biosystems, USA. Translated nucleotide sequences of QRDR in gyrA and parC genes were compared with corresponding reference protein sequences using BLAST software of NCBI; National Center for Biotechnology Information (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast). GyrA accession number used for E. coli was WP_074153749.1, for Klebsiella spp. was WP_075874334.1 and for Citrobacter spp. was WP_044266198.1. Accession number for parC was AML00471.1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!