The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

8 protocols using high fidelity 2 pcr master mix

1

Targeted Sequencing Amplification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Targeted deep sequencing analyses were done as previously described (44 (link)). Briefly, we used a two-step PCR amplification approach to produce DNA fragments for each on-target and off-target site. In the first step, we used locus-specific primers bearing universal overhangs with ends complementary to the TruSeq adaptor sequences (Data Set S1). DNA was amplified with High Fidelity 2× PCR Master Mix (NEB) using appropriate annealing temperatures for the on-target (NTS1C) and off-target (NTS1C-OT1) sites. In the second step, the purified PCR pool was amplified with a universal forward primer and an indexed reverse primer to reconstitute the TruSeq adaptors. Full-size products (∼250 bp in length) were extracted using AMPure beads (Beckman Coulter). The purified library was deep sequenced using a paired-end 150 bp MiSeq run. Raw deep sequencing data and the results of statistical tests are reported in Data Set S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Single-Cell RNA Editing Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293FT cells were transfected as described with 25 ng of a plasmid encoding a dCas13bt3-ADAR2dd(E488Q) fusion expressed from a CMV promoter, 300 ng of a plasmid encoding a crRNA expressed from a human U6 promoter, and 45 ng of a dual Gaussia/ Cypridina(W85X) luciferase reporter plasmid (Cox et al., 2017 (link)) (Table S1). After 48 h, the RNA was harvested, and reverse transcription was then performed as described (Joung et al., 2017 (link)), using a gene-specific primer for the Cypridian luciferase (5′-TTTGCATTCATCTGGTACTTCTAGGGTGTC-3′). cDNA was used as input for the preparation of next-generation sequencing libraries with NEBNext High-Fidelity 2 × PCR Master Mix (NEB), and amplicons were then sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq. Editing was quantified by counting the number of reads at which the expected edited position in the amplicon was identified as G and dividing by the total number of reads in the sample, using Python. Unless otherwise noted, all reported data are the average of four biological replicates. To measure the restoration of the Cypridina luciferase (W85X) activity, the culture media were aspirated from the same cell samples and the Cypridina and Gaussia luciferase activities in the media were measured as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Transcriptomic Analysis of Drosophila Neural Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from groups of at least 30 dissected DNTs at each stage, as well as from whole heads (two groups of 20) and whole embryos (two groups of 10) at T20. Tissue was lysed in the Ambion RNAqueous Total RNA Isolation kit lysis buffer (AM1931), set on ice for 15 mins with occasional vortexing, flash frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at − 80 °C. RNA was extracted using the Ambion RNAqueous Micro Total RNA isolation kit and assessed using the Agilent Bioanalyser. Sequencing libraries were prepared from 100 ng RNA per sample using the NEBNExt Ultra Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (E7420) in combination with the NEBNext Poly(A) mRNA Magnetic Isolation Module (E7490) and NEBNext High-Fidelity 2 × PCR Master Mix (M0451S). Libraries were indexed and enriched by 15 cycles of amplification. Library preparation was assessed using the Agilent TapeStation and libraries quantified by Qubit. The concentration of library pools was assessed with the KAPA Library Quantification Kit (KK4835). Multiplexed library pools were sequenced using paired-end 75–100 bp runs on the Illumina NextSeq500 platform for DNT libraries and on the Illumina HiSeq2500 platform for T20 heads and embryos.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiplexed CRISPR Library Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PCR was performed with NEBNext® High-Fidelity 2× PCR Master Mix (M0541). Thermal cycler parameters were set to: initial denaturation for 5 min at 98 °C, 20 cycles of denaturation at 98 °C for 30 s, annealing for 30 s at 58 °C, extension for 40 s at 72 °C, and final extension for 5 min at 72 °C. PCR products were purified via 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, 28706). All samples were denatured and diluted according to the Illumina NextSeq system denature and dilute libraries guide (document # 15048776 v09, illumina.com) and sequenced on an Illumina NextSeq 500. Custom Python scripts, cutadapt 2.8 and Bowtie2 2.3.0 were used to deconvolute the raw data and determine the abundance of individual gRNAs in each sample53 (link),54 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Single-Cell RNA Editing Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HEK293FT cells were transfected as described with 25 ng of a plasmid encoding a dCas13bt3-ADAR2dd(E488Q) fusion expressed from a CMV promoter, 300 ng of a plasmid encoding a crRNA expressed from a human U6 promoter, and 45 ng of a dual Gaussia/ Cypridina(W85X) luciferase reporter plasmid (Cox et al., 2017 (link)) (Table S1). After 48 h, the RNA was harvested, and reverse transcription was then performed as described (Joung et al., 2017 (link)), using a gene-specific primer for the Cypridian luciferase (5′-TTTGCATTCATCTGGTACTTCTAGGGTGTC-3′). cDNA was used as input for the preparation of next-generation sequencing libraries with NEBNext High-Fidelity 2 × PCR Master Mix (NEB), and amplicons were then sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq. Editing was quantified by counting the number of reads at which the expected edited position in the amplicon was identified as G and dividing by the total number of reads in the sample, using Python. Unless otherwise noted, all reported data are the average of four biological replicates. To measure the restoration of the Cypridina luciferase (W85X) activity, the culture media were aspirated from the same cell samples and the Cypridina and Gaussia luciferase activities in the media were measured as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Nontemplated-addition Reverse Transcription

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A nontemplated-addition reverse transcription reaction (no TSO present; 50-μl total volume) contained 0.1 μm RNA template (5′-OH, 5′-p, or 5′-m7G–capped 4rN-25mer-RNA-FAM), 1× Template Switching RT Buffer, 1 mm dNTP solution mixture, 30 nm i7 primer, and 500 units of Template Switching RT. The reaction was performed at 42 °C for 90 min followed by a 10-min heat-denaturation step at 72 °C. After the reaction, 2.5 units of RNase H (catalog number M0297) and 25 units of RNase If (catalog number M0243) were added to the reaction and incubated at 37 °C for 20 min to hydrolyze the RNA template. The cDNA was purified using an Oligo Clean & Concentrator. The purified cDNA was incubated in a 20-μl reaction with 750 nm 5′-AppDNA (see supporting information for sequence), 1× NEBuffer 1, 5 mm MnCl2, and 2 μm Thermostable 5′-AppDNA/RNA Ligase (catalog number M0319) at 65 °C for 60 min to perform 3′ single-strand cDNA ligation. The reaction was inactivated at 90 °C for 3 min. The ligated products were subjected to PCR amplification with NEBNext Universal and Index primers (catalog number E7335) using NEBNext High-Fidelity 2× PCR Master Mix (catalog number M0541). The libraries were cleaned up with NEBNext Sample Purification Beads (catalog number E7767) and sequenced on an Illumina iSeq-100 as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

CUT&Tag Assay for H3K9me2 Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CUT&Tag assays were performed as described previously with some modifications (50 (link)). Briefly, 1 × 105 cells were washed twice with wash buffer [20 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM spermidine and 1× protease inhibitors] by gentle pipetting. A 10 μl aliquot of concanavalin A-coated magnetic beads (Bangs Laboratories, BP531) was activated and added per sample and incubated at RT for 10 min. The supernatants were removed and bead-bound cells were resuspended in 100 μl of wash buffer containing 0.01% digitonin and 2 mM EDTA. The H3K9me2 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, 4658) was added and incubated overnight at 4°C on a rotator. The beads were washed and resuspended in 300-wash buffer containing 300 mM NaCl with pG-Tn5 (Vazyme, S602) at RT for 1 h. The beads were washed and tagmentation was performed in 300-wash buffer supplemented with 10 mM MgCl2 at 37°C for 1 h. To stop the tagmentation reaction, 2.25 μl of 0.5 M EDTA, 2.75 μl of 10% SDS and 5 μl of proteinase K (20 mg/ml) were added and further incubated at 55°C for 2 h. Then the genomic DNAs were extracted by phenol–chloroform and subjected to PCR amplification using NEBNext High-Fidelity 2× PCR Master Mix (NEB, M0541S) for 13 cycles. The libraries were size-selected with 1.2× AMpure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, A63881) and sequenced on a NovaSeq 6000 sequencer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Targeted Deep Sequencing for Indel Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA from cells or tissues were collected using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen). Indel frequencies were measured by targeted deep sequencing. Targeted deep sequencing analyses were done as previously described (Bolukbasi et al. 2015 (link)). Briefly, target sites were amplified using High Fidelity 2× PCR Master Mix (NEB) in a two-step PCR amplification with locus-specific primers in the first step and then with universal index primers to reconstitute TruSeq adapters. Full-size products were gel-extracted and purified using a DNA Clean and Concentrator Kit (Zymo). The purified library was sequenced using a paired-end 150 bp MiniSeq run using a Mid-output cartridge (Illumina). Raw deep sequencing data are provided in the Supplemental Excel File.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!