The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spectralon panel

Manufactured by Labsphere
Sourced in United States

Spectralon panels are highly reflective, Lambertian diffuse white reference standards designed for use as reflectance and transmittance calibration standards. Spectralon is a sintered polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) material that provides a near-perfect diffuse reflectance over the UV, visible, and near-infrared portions of the spectrum.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

6 protocols using spectralon panel

1

Multispectral Imaging for Crop Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five flights at an altitude of 60 m high were carried out during two seasons (three flights in 2014 and two in 2015) with the aim of extending the variability of field and plant condition. Meteorological conditions and phenological stages for each day of data collection were recorded (Table 2). All flights and image acquisition were concurrently done with Ψstem field measurements.
Flights in both seasons were carried out between 12:30 and 13:00, to reduce the ‘shadow-effect’ on the images [64 (link)]. Multispectral images were obtained from a MCA-6 camera (Tetracam’s miniature camera array), recording wavelengths at 530, 550, 570, 670, 700 and 800 nm. The image reflectance was normalized using a ‘white reference’ Spectralon panel (Labsphere Inc., Sutton, NH, USA) and compared with a spectroradiometer (SVC HR-1024, Spectra Vista Cooperation, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA) to account for any relative spectral response of each band of the camera as proposed by Laliberte, et al. [65 (link)]. All image processing was carried out using Matlab (MATLAB 2013a, The MathWorks, INC., Natick, MA, USA). The MCA-6 sensor was mounted on an octocopter, Mikrokopter Okto XL, equipped with the FlightNav 2.1 flight and navigation controller, MK3638 motors and 12”× 3.8’’ propellers. The sensor was affixed to a servo-controlled gimbal for stability and to ensure that it pointed directly down during flight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

In Situ Coral Spectral Reflectance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Remotely sensed spectral information was collected in situ (between 0930–1100 hrs local time) before coral sampling using a GER-1500 portable field spectroradiometer enclosed within a custom made underwater housing (SpectraVista Corp.). The GER-1500 has a spectral range of 278–1094 nm with 512 spectral bands and a Full Width at Half Maximum (FWHM) equal to 2.8 nm). The housing was held by a diver at a 45° angle and a distance of 2.5 cm away from the target to ensure minimal or no signal contamination due to the presence of dissolved or particulate matter in the water column. Five replicate radiance measurements were obtained from each coral colony and used to study possible differences in reflectance within each sample. Additionally, radiance measurements were obtained from a 50% opaque diffuse barium sulfate (BaSO4) reference Spectralon® panel (Labsphere Inc.) immediately after sample spectral data collection at the same distance to correct for any atmospheric or wave lensing effects. Coral-leaving radiance was converted to remote sensing reflectance (Rrs) using: Rrs = Lc/Eg, where Lc is the coral-leaving radiance, and Eg = πLp/Gc with Lp is the diffuse surface panel-leaving radiance and Gc is the calibration factor of the diffuse panel. The spectra were smoothed with a low pass Savitzky-Golay filter [17 –18 ] to eliminate spectral variability at scales shorter than 4 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Leaf Spectral Reflectance Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaf reflectance in the visible to shortwave infrared range (350–2500 nm, with a spectral resolution of 3 nm for wavelengths under 1000 nm, and < 8 nm up to 2500) was measured using a portable full range spectroradiometer (SR-3500, Spectral Evolution, Lawrence, USA), following the protocol described in Tóth et al. [60 (link)]. After 20-min dark adaptation, leaves were laid on a flat neoprene plate (reflectance factor < 5%) to minimize background reflection of light transmitted through the leaves. Leaf reflected radiance was measured at contact using a probe equipped with a 5-W internal light source under near-steady state conditions, i.e. 60 s after removing the leaf clip. Each spectrum is the result of 10 averaged scans, and automatic integration time optimization was used, with a maximum allowed of 50 ms per scan. Leaf spectra were eventually calibrated to reflectance using reflected radiance from a Spectralon panel (Labsphere, North Sutton, USA; reflectance factor > 99% for wavelengths under 1500 nm, and > 95% up to 2500 nm) as reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Radiometric Calibration and Reflectance Normalization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw images were radiometrically calibrated to account for non-uniform spatial and spectral responses of the sensor due to variability in gain and offset of each detector. Raw digital numbers (DNs) were converted to radiance (Wm−2sr−1nm−1) using the radiometric calibration file provided by the camera manufacturer. Radiance was then converted to reflectance to normalize image data based on incoming solar irradiance so objects could be compared more objectively across images and across capture dates. A Spectralon panel (Labsphere, Inc., North Sutton, NH, USA) was placed in each image and was used as a reference to convert from radiance to reflectance. Spectralon reflects ~99.7% of incident light equally in all directions regardless of the illuminated light angle. Radiometric conversions were performed using Spectronon Pro software (Resonon, Inc., Bozeman, MT, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Leaf Nitrogen Estimation Using Spectroscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Foliar N content was estimated using in situ/in vivo reflectance spectroscopy on fresh, green leaves. For all plants measured in both 2011 (n ¼ 24) and 2013 (n ¼ 24), leaf reflectance spectra were collected from one upper and lower leaf selected at random using a full-range (400-2,500 nm, reflectance estimated at 1-nm intervals) portable spectroradiometer (ASD FieldSpec 3, Analytical Spectral Devices, Boulder, CO). Physical measurements were acquired using a leaf-clip consisting of a contact probe attached to a fiber optic and a calibrated light source. Leaf reflectance from the contact probe is determined relative to that of a 99% (white) Spectralon panel (Labsphere, Inc., North Sutton, NH). For each canopy position (upper and lower) leaf, we made five spectral measurements, which were averaged to generate one single spectrum per plant representing those two canopy locations. From those spectra, we applied an existing chemometric equation (partial least squares regression [PLSR]; Wold et al. 2001 ) to estimate N concentration by dry weight as a function of reflectance in each wavelength. Here we used wavelength-by-wavelength PLSR coefficients reported by Serbin et al. (2014) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Measuring Winter Wheat Canopy Reflectance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, all the in situ canopy reflectance spectra were obtained with an ASD FieldSpec Handheld 2 passive spectroradiometer (ASD Inc., Boulder, CO, United States) at nadir from a height of approximately 1.0 m above the winter wheat canopy under sunny conditions between 11:00 and 14:00 (Figure 1D). To reduce the influence of atmospheric and field conditions, the winter wheat canopy spectral reflectance was measured at six sites in each plot, and 60 scans served as the mean canopy spectrum for each plot. A 30 × 30-cm BaSO4 calibration Spectralon® panel (Spectralon®, Labsphere, Inc., North Sutton, NH, United States) was applied to calibrate the reflectance and radiance before and after taking a measurement. Wavelengths below 400 and above 900 nm were excluded due to the low signal. Therefore, the canopy reflectance data were resampled within the range of 400–900 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!