The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using metavue

1

Fluorescent in-situ Hybridization of Brassica Genomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Preparation of slides and hybridization were carried out according to procedures detailed by Suay et al. (2014) (link). The ribosomal probe used in this study was 35S rDNA (pTa 71 clone) from wheat (Gerlach and Bedbrook, 1979 (link)), IGS-A and IGS-C probes described further below and the BAC clone B. oleracea named Bob014O06 (Howell et al., 2002 (link)). This BAC clone was used as ‘GISH-like’ to distinguish specifically all C-genome chromosomes in B. napus (Suay et al., 2014 (link)). The 35S rDNA and BAC clone were labelled with Alexa-488 dUTP by random priming, the IGS-A with biotin-dUTP (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) using PCR and the IGS-C with biotin-dUTP (Roche) using nick translation (Bionick DNA labelling System, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Biotinylated probe was immunodetected by Texas Red avidin DCS (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) and the signal was amplified with biotinylated anti-avidin D (Vector Laboratories). The chromosomes were mounted and counterstained in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Ontario, Canada) containing 2·5 μg mL–1 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Fluorescence images were captured using a CoolSnap HQ camera (Photometrics, Tucson, AZ, USA) on an Axioplan 2 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and analysed using MetaVueTM (Universal Imaging Corporation, Downington, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Chromosome-based BAC Localization in Banana

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromosome preparations were performed as described in D’Hont et al. (2000) . Seven BAC clones (MAMB_34N11, MAMB_17B03, MAMB_51M04, MAMH_47D06, MAMB_01M16, MAMB_51J24, and MAMH_66D03) from both sides of the breakpoints were selected from a BamH1 and HindIII BAC libraries of accession DH-Pahang (D’Hont et al. 2012 (link); http://banana-genome.cirad.fr/; last accessed May 29, 2017). BAC clones were labeled by random priming with biotin-14-dUTP (Invitrogen, Life Technologies) or Alexa 488-5-dUTP (Invitrogen, Life Technologies). In situ hybridization was performed as described in D’Hont et al. (1996) (link) with the following modifications. Chromosome preparations were incubated in RNAse A (100 ng/µl), pepsin (100 mg/ml) in 0.01M HCl and fixed with paraformaldehyde (4%). Biotinylated probes were immunodetected by Texas Red avidin DCS (Vector Laboratories) and the signal was amplified with biotinylated antiavidin D (Vector Laboratories). Fluorescence images were captured using a CoolSnap HQ camera (Photometrics, Tucson, Ariz) via an Axioplan 2 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and analyzed using MetaVueTM (Universal Imaging Corporation, Downington, PA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chromosome Number Determination in S. versicolor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chromosome number of S. versicolor was determined on mitotic chromosomes obtained from two plants collected in France (Vieux Salins and Saint-Louis du Rhone). Mitotic chromosomes were observed on metaphasic cells isolated from root tips. The roots tips of 0.5-1.5 cm length were treated with 0.04 % 8-hydroxiquinoline for 2 h at 4 °C in the dark followed by 2 h at room temperature to accumulate metaphases, then fixed in ethanol-acetic acid (3:1, v/v) for 12 h at 4 °C and stored in ethanol 70 % at -20 °C. After washing in 0.01 M enzyme buffer (citric acidsodium citrate pH 4.5) for 15 min, the roots were digested in a solution of 5 % Onozuka R-10 cellulase (Sigma) and 1 % Y23 pectolyase (Sigma) at 37 °C for 30 min. The root tips were then washed with distilled water for 30 min. Root tips transferred on a slide were squashed in a drop of 3:1 ethanol-acetic acid fixation solution. After air-drying, slides were stained with 4,6diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Fluorescence images were captured using a CoolSnap HQ camera (Photometrics, Tucson, Ariz) on an Axioplan 2 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and analysed using MetaVue TM (Universal Imaging Corporation, Downington, PA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Chromosome Identification via BAC-FISH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Preparation of slides and hybridization using bacterial artificial chromosome—fluorescent in situ hybridization (BAC-FISH) was carried as described in [53 (link)–55 (link)]. A B. distachyon BAC clone, ABR1-63-E6, that hybridizes all chromosomes of B. distachyon, but not those of B. stacei was labelled by random priming with biotin-14-dUTP (Invitrogen, Life Technologies) [56 (link)]. A ribosomal DNA probe, pTa 71,[57 (link)] which contains a 9-kb EcoRI fragment of rDNA repeat unit (18S-5.8S-26S genes and spacers) isolated from Triticum aestivum was labelled with Alexa-488 dUTP by random priming. Biotinylated probe was immunodetected using Texas Red avidin DCS (Vector Laboratories) and the signal was amplified with biotinylated anti-avidin D (Vector Laboratories). The chromosomes were mounted and counterstained in Vectashield (Vector Laboratories) containing 2.5 μg/mL 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Fluorescence images were captured using a CoolSnap HQ camera (Photometrics, Tucson, Ariz) on an Axioplan 2 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and analysed using MetaVueTM (Universal Imaging Corporation,Downington, PA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

DAPI Staining and Fluorescence Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Staining with DAPI (diamidino-2-phenylindole; Sigma–Aldrich, United States) was carried out essentially as described already (Patkar et al., 2010 (link); Ramanujam and Naqvi, 2010 (link)). Bright field and epifluorescence microscopy was performed with an Olympus IX71 or BX51 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) using a Plan APO 100X/1.45 or UPlan FLN 60X/1.25 objective and appropriate filter sets. Images were captured with Photometrics CoolSNAP HQ camera (Tucson, AZ, United States) and processed using MetaVue (Universal Imaging, Downingtown, PA, United States), and Adobe Photoshop 7.0.1 (Mountain View, CA, United States). Time-lapse or live cell fluorescence microscopy was performed using a an UltraView RS-3 spinning disk confocal system (PerkinElmer Inc., United States) using a 491 nm 100 mW and a 561 nm 50 mW laser illumination under the control of MetaMorph Premier Software (Ramanujam et al., 2013 (link),BR52). Typically, z-stacks consisted of 0.5 μm-spaced planes for every time point. Image processing and preparation was performed using Fiji2, and Adobe Photoshop.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Root Tip Mitosis Slide Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Root tips were collected in 0.04% 8-hydroxyquinoline solution and incubated for 2 h at room temperature, followed by another 2 h at 4 °C. Root tips were then transferred to Carnoy’s I solution (3:1 parts ethanol: acetic acid) and incubated for 24 h before being transferred to 70% ethanol for storage at −20 °C. The procedure for mitosis slide preparation from root tips was as reported by Mason et al. (2014a (link)), using the DAPI as the fluorescent stain. Fluorescence images were captured using a Cool Snap HQ camera (Photometrics) on an Axioplan 2 microscope (Zeiss) and analyzed using the MetaVue (Universal Imaging).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Mammary Gland Whole Mount Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mammary gland whole mount analysis was carried out as described by Kleinberg et al. [23] (link). All chemicals came from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), unless otherwise stated. After harvesting, tissues were fixed in ice-cold 4% paraformaldehyde for 2 h. Mammary glands were stored in 70% ethanol until further analysis. In short, following 3 washes with aceton for 30 min, mammary glands were rehydrated in 100% and 95% ethanol (30 min each). The glands were stained for 1 h with filtered hematoxylin, followed by thorough rinsing with tap water. Background staining was minimized by incubation (3×35 min) in a solution of 150 ml 100% ethanol, 150 ml aqua dest. and 7.5 ml HCl 1N (Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Munich, Germany). Subsequently tissues were dehydrated in 70%, 95% and 100% ethanol (2×30 min for each step), followed by an incubation in Xylol (Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) overnight. For long term storage mammary gland whole mounts were placed in methylsalicylate. Digital images of squash preparations were taken by a transmitted-light microscope stand mounted with a NIKON D200 camera (Nikon GmbH, Düsseldorf, Germany) at a distance of 60 cm all in one day. Picture analysis was performed using MetaVue software (MetaVue, Universal Imaging Corp., Downingtown, PA, USA) and ImageJ [34] (link). Pixel size was 11.125 µmx11.125 µm and pixel area was 123.766 µm2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fluorescence and Bright-field Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Time-lapse or live-cell fluorescence microscopy was performed using a Zeiss Axiovert 200 M microscope (Plan Apochromat 1006, 1.4NA objective) with an Ultra-View RS-3 spinning disk confocal system (PerkinElmer Inc., Shelton, CT, USA) which was equipped with a CSU21 confocal optical scanner, 12-bit digital cooled Hamamatsu Orca-ER camera (OPELCO, Sterling, VA, USA) and a 491 nm 100 mW and a 561 nm 50 mW laser illumination under the control of MetaMorph Premier Software (Universal Imaging, New York, NY, USA) [39 (link),40 (link)]. Briefly, z-stacks comprised of 0.5 µm-spaced sections that were captured. GFP excitation were performed at 491 nm (Emission 525/40 nm).
Bright-field microscopy was carried out by an Olympus IX71 microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a Plan APO 100X/1.45 objective. Images were captured by Photometrics CoolSNAP HQ camera (Tucson, AZ, USA) and processed with MetaVue (Universal Imaging, Downingtown, PA, USA), Adobe Illustrator (Adobe Inc., San Jose, CA, USA), and ImageJ (LOCI, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Root Tip Mitosis Slide Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Root tips were collected in 0.04% 8-hydroxyquinoline solution and incubated for 2 h at room temperature, followed by another 2 h at 4 °C. Root tips were then transferred to Carnoy’s I solution (3:1 parts ethanol: acetic acid) and incubated for 24 h before being transferred to 70% ethanol for storage at −20 °C. The procedure for mitosis slide preparation from root tips was as reported by Mason et al. (2014a (link)), using the DAPI as the fluorescent stain. Fluorescence images were captured using a Cool Snap HQ camera (Photometrics) on an Axioplan 2 microscope (Zeiss) and analyzed using the MetaVue (Universal Imaging).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!