The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ge signa hdx 3t

Manufactured by GE Healthcare

The GE Signa HDx 3T is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system that operates at a field strength of 3 Tesla. It is designed to provide high-quality, detailed images of the body's internal structures. The Signa HDx 3T utilizes advanced technology to generate and process the magnetic signals required for MRI scans, enabling healthcare professionals to obtain diagnostic information.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

2 protocols using ge signa hdx 3t

1

MRI and Ultrasound Imaging of Pelvic Floor Anatomy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following equipment was used for MRI: GE Signa HDx 3T (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis); Siemens 3T Trio Tim (Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA). At the outset of the 5-year study, we obtained a variety of high resolution, T2 2D MRI sequences in the sagittal and axial planes (parallel to the puborectalis muscle) at rest.[11 (link)] These sequences parallel to the puborectalis (PPR) were purposely obtained in order to measure relevant biometry in this plane of minimal hiatal dimensions. During the course of the study, we began using 3D isotropic T2-weighted sequences, which allowed us to manipulate high-resolution images in any plane we desired. Details of our imaging protocols have previously been published.[11 (link)–13 (link)]
At the same baseline visit, we also performed 3D transperineal ultrasounds at rest, squeeze and Valsalva using GE Voluson 730 (BT05) or GE Voluson e (BT12) equipped with RAB 4- to 8-MHz curved-array 3D transducer (GE Medical Systems, Zipf, Austria). We acquired volume datasets with an acquisition angle of 85 degrees, maximum field of view of 70 degrees in the sagittal plane, and depth of 6.8 cm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Validating Breast Density Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The validation dataset included 28 healthy volunteers (age 20–64,
mean 35 years old), as described in a previous paper (30 (link)). These women were recruited to participate in a
non-contrast breast density study. Each subject was scanned using four different
MR scanners in two institutions, including GE Signa-HDx 1.5T, GE Signa-HDx 3T
(GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI), Philips Achieva 3.0T TX (Philips Medical
Systems, Eindhoven, Netherlands) and Siemens Symphony 1.5T TIM (Siemens,
Erlangen, Germany). Non-contrast T1-weighted images without fat suppression were
used for segmentation. Since both left and right breasts were normal, they were
analyzed separately, so there was a total of 56 breasts. The validation was done
using the 56 breasts acquired by each scanner first, and then using all 224
breasts acquired by all 4 scanners together. With a cases number of more than
200, it should be sufficient to do independent validation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!