The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Genemarker v2

Manufactured by SoftGenetics
Sourced in United States

GeneMarker V2.2.0 is a software application for analysis of genetic data. It provides tools for visualization, editing, and interpretation of DNA sequence data from various sources.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

64 protocols using genemarker v2

1

Microsatellite Genotyping of Cyperus papyrus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from dried leaves of adults and juveniles using the commercial E.Z.N. A® SP plant DNA Miniprep Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Inc.). Fifteen microsatellite primers developed for C. papyrus (Triest et al. 2013 (link); Geremew et al. under review) were used to genotype. Conditions for PCR amplification were as stated in Triest et al. (2013) (link). Amplicons were separated using ABI 3730xl genetic analyzer (Applied Biosystems) and fragment lengths (allele sizes) were estimated relative to the internal size standard (LIZ500). We scored allele sizes manually for each microsatellite locus per individual with GeneMarker® v2.4.1 (SoftGenetics LLC, State College, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genotyping House Sparrows Using Microsatellites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted using the QIAGEN DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer's protocol. Because of potential misidentification of Spanish sparrows (P. hispaniolensis) as house sparrows, we genetically identified individuals to species from southern sampling sites using the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) mitochondrial gene (Appendix S1).
We genotyped house sparrow individuals for twelve published microsatellite loci (Dawson et al., 2012; Garnier et al., 2009; Griffith et al., 2007) (Table S2). Of these twelve loci, two were monomorphic in the majority of the sampling locations after initial genotyping of a subset of individuals and omitted from further analyses. Fragment length analysis was carried out on an ABI 3730 sequencer at the University of Turku, Finland. Results were analyzed with GeneMarker V2.4.1 (Softgenetics, State College, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chromosomal Copy Number Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Copy number status for chromosomes 1p, 3, 6 and 8 was analyzed (n = 89) using the SALSA MLPA kit P027‐C1 (MRC Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands). Data were obtained with GeneMarker v2.2 software (Softgenetics, State College, PA) after population normalization, and tumor‐to‐reference ratio calculation. Ratios of ≤0.88 and ≥1.24 were used for loss and gain, respectively. These cut‐offs were derived from tumors (n = 17) assessed by both multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification (MLPA) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) (OncoScan™ FFPE Express 2.0 Services, Affymetrix, Supplementary methods).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Chromosomal Aneuploidies via QF-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
QF-PCR is a method used for detecting chromosome copy number by amplification of polymorphic DNA markers (short tandem repeats) specific to the chromosomes of interest (commonly 13, 18, 21, X, and Y). Following PCR using fluorescent primers, the amplification products are separated by size using a capillary electrophoresis system, and the amount of DNA present in each fragment is automatically quantified.
All samples with a normal female karyotype were subjected to QF-PCR testing for maternal cell contamination by comparison of multiple microsatellite markers in maternal blood versus cell culture and/or fetal sample. The IVD QF-PCR Devyser (Devyser AB, Stockholm, Sweden) prenatal kit, testing for aneuploidies of chromosomes 21, 18, 13, X, and Y, as well as the extended kit for chromosomes 15, 16, and 22 were used. DNA purification was performed using Promega Wizard™ Genomic (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). The amplicons were migrated on the ABI3730xl platform (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and data were analyzed using GeneMarker v2.2 software (SoftGenetics, State College, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Elymus nutans Genetic Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Four cpDNA fragments (trnH-psbA, trnL-F, matK, and rbcL) were amplified and sequenced across all E. nutans samples. These fragments were amplified using primers previously reported in the literature, known for showcasing polymorphisms in other Elymus species (Xiong et al., 2022 (link)). Amplification was conducted in a 30 μL reaction volume, comprising of 30 ng of genomic DNA, 1.5 μL of each primer, and 15 μL of 2× Es Taq MasterMix (CoWin Biosciences, Beijing, China), using a C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler (BIO-RAD, Foster City, CA, USA). The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) conditions throughout the experiment were consistent with those described by Shaw et al (Shaw et al., 2005 (link)), and the resulting products were sequenced by Tsingke Biotech (Beijing, China). The genotypes of all 361 samples were determined using nine pairs of EST-SSR primers developed for E. nutans in our previous study based on transcriptomic data, and the PCR procedure followed the same protocol as we described previously (Li et al., 2023 (link)). The PCR products were subjected to capillary electrophoresis in an ABI 3730xl DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA) and analyzed using GeneMarker v. 2.2 software (SoftGenetics, Pennsylvania, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Fragment Size Analysis by Capillary Electrophoresis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Products were separated on an ABI PRISM 3130 × l genetic analyzer (Life Tech, Grand Island, NY 14072, USA). 1 μl of PCR product was mixed with 0.5 μl of MapMarker ROX 1000 (Bioventures, Murfreesboro, TN, USA) and 9 μl of HiDi Formamide (Life Tech, Grand Island, NY 14072, USA). The mixture was denatured at 95°C for 5 min then loaded onto the 3130 × l genetic analyzer. Fragment size was analyzed using GeneMarker V2.6 (Softgenetics, State College, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Microsatellite analysis of crayfish

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For microsatellite analysis, walking legs of specimens were fixed in 80% ethanol prior to extraction of nuclear DNA with the Blood & Cell Culture DNA Kit (Genomic Tips) from Qiagen (Hilden, Germany). A total of five microsatellite primer pairs were tested. Four of them were originally designed for P. clarkii (PclG-02, PclG-04, PclG-08, PclG-48) (Belfiore and May, 2000 (link)) and one pair (PclG-26) was designed for marbled crayfish based on the P. clarkii sequences (Vogt et al., 2008 (link)). The same microsatellite loci were additionally investigated in P. alleni and P. clarkii. PCR was carried out using a Primus 96 Cycler (Peqlab Biotechnologie, Erlangen, Germany). Fragment analysis was performed on a Beckman Coulter CEQ 8000 eight capillary sequencer (Beckman Coulter, Krefeld, Germany) using the Beckman Coulter DNA Size Standard Kit 400 bp. Loci were scored with GeneMarker, v.2.6 (SoftGenetics, State College, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Automated Allele Counting for Triploidy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Automated allele counts were made using the software Genemarker v.2.6 (SoftGenetics LLC™) with a minimum intensity of 100 RFU required for a peak to be called and where an allele was called for a heterozygous peak that was at least 40% of the height of the other peak at that marker. Manual checks were made for all genotypes to ensure correct allele scoring. Allele counts record the number of uniquely sized allele fragments per marker, and thus take no account of allele dosing or homozygosity.
The allele count table for each batch of genotypes was exported into Microsoft Excel and the genotype scoring rate (GSR) was determined as the number of markers that had an allele count of at least one, divided by the total number of markers genotyped (i.e. 12). Samples were then analysed in respect to triploidy based on the following semi-strict (A), and strict (B) criteria:
A. Where at least one marker had three unique allele fragments.
B. Where at least two markers had three unique allele fragments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genetic Diversity Analysis of Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GeneMarker® V2.7.0 software (SoftGenetics, LLC State College, PA, USA) was used for peak identification and allele size determination. Each peak was considered as an allele, and the genotype of each individual at each locus was determined and exported to Excel for statistical analysis. Observed number of alleles (Na), effective number of alleles (Ne), Nei’s gene diversity of each locus (H) [52 (link)], Shannon information index (I), total gene diversity (Ht), within-population gene diversity (Hs) and coefficient of gene differentiation (Gst) were calculated using POPGENE ver 1.32. [53 ].
To examine the genetic relationship among the 43 populations, Nei’s measure of genetic distance was calculated, and a dendrogram was constructed using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) using MEGA7 software [54 (link),55 ]. To evaluate the differentiation among groups of populations, among populations and variation within populations, an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) was conducted using ARLEQUIN ver 3.5 software [56 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Detecting PIK3CA Mutations via SNaPshot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SNaPshot is a rapid and simple assay to detect multiple PIK3CA mutations present in down to 5-10% of the tumor cells in a single analysis (Boland et al. 2003 (link), Fariña Sarasqueta et al. 2011) (link). The SNaPshot Multiplex System for SNP Genotyping (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was therefore used to identify PIK3CA mutations in our cohort. The qPCR products were first diluted in LoTE to a working concentration of 2.5 ng/µL and were then amplified, using the PIK3CA primers at a final concentration of 1 µM for exon 9 and 0.7 µM for exon 20 (Supplementary Table 1). Then, samples were purified using 3 U/Well FastAP and 0.45 U/Well Exonuclease 1 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) after which the SNaPshot ddNTP multiplex probe mix (Supplementary Table 2) was used to extend and terminate the reaction as previously described (Hurst et al. 2009) (link). Finally, an ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to detect the mutations by electrophoresis. Breast cancer cell lines with known PIK3CA mutation status were used as positive and negative controls. Mutation analysis was performed using GeneMarker V2.7.0 Software (SoftGenetics, LLC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!