The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sas stat

Manufactured by SAS Institute
Sourced in United States

SAS/STAT is a software component of the SAS System that provides a comprehensive set of statistical procedures for data analysis. It includes a wide range of statistical methods for modeling, analyzing, and interpreting data. SAS/STAT covers techniques such as regression, analysis of variance, multivariate analysis, survival analysis, and more. The software is designed to handle large and complex data sets, and provides advanced statistical capabilities for researchers, analysts, and data scientists.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

156 protocols using sas stat

1

Splenic Alterations in Canine Leishmaniosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Based on ultrasound evaluation, spleen size was scored 0 in case of normal dimension and 1 when it was enlarged. Similarly, a score of 1 was given to normal spleen echogenicity, and a score of −1 was given in case of spleen echo-structure diffuse alterations [12 ] (modified). The data of quantitative parameters (CEUS) were analyzed by ANOVA using the GLM procedure of the SAS/STAT® software (SAS Inst. Inc., Version 9.3, 2017; Cary, NC, USA) while considering the clinical stage and ROIs as variables. Differences in ROIs between clinical stages were not significant (p > 0.05); therefore, this variable was removed from the dataset. The separation of means was assessed by Tukey’s test, and differences were considered significant if p < 0.05. Results were reported as least squares means ± standard error of the mean. Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) were used to measure the relationships between splenic alterations and enlargements to leishmaniosis stage, L. infantum quantitative PCR, and IFAT anti-L. infantum antibody titers. The test was performed by the SAS/STAT® software (2017).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Repeated-measures analysis of data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyses were done with the statistical software SAS/STAT. Data analysis over time was undertaken by repeated-measures analysis with SAS/STAT. Differences were considered statistically significant if the p value was <0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Longitudinal Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analyses were done with the statistical software SAS/STAT. Data analysis over time was undertaken by repeated-measures analysis with SAS/STAT. Differences were considered statistically significant if the P value was <0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comparing Fecal Biomarkers in BAD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Demographics, fasting serum FGF19 and C4, primary and total fecal BAs, fecal weight, and CT were reported as median and interquartile range (IQR).
We used analysis of variance (ANOVA) on ranks test, followed by Dunn’s test corrected for multiple comparisons (2-sided α=0.05) to compare demographics (age and BMI), BAD diagnostic tests, fecal weight, and CT at 24 hours between the 4 different groups. When the overall ANOVA on ranks was borderline (<0.12), we performed Mann Whitney rank sum tests to compare the BAD group with the three other groups, with Bonferroni correction (p<0.0168) to correct for three comparisons (SigmaPlot, Systat Software, San Jose, CA).
SAS/STAT® [Version (9.4) of the SAS System for (Unix) Copyright© (2017) SAS Institute, Inc.] and JMP (JMP®, Version 13, SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, 1989–2017) software were utilized to create receiver operating curves (ROC) to determine the associations of the BAD diagnostic tests with fecal weight >400 grams/48h and CT at 24 hours >3.34. Logistic regression and odds ratios were calculated to compare the differences in the demographic data (age, sex and BMI) in patients with elevated percentage of primary BAs alone versus those with increased total fecal BAs.
Supplemental Materials include details of patient selection and all measurements, including relevant references.18 (link)–39
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Carotid Atherosclerosis and Arterial Stiffness Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analysis was performed using SAS/STAT (SAS Institute Inc., Cary,
North Carolina, USA).
Continuous variables with normal distribution were presented as mean and standard
deviation, and continuous variables with non-normal distribution were presented
as medians and interquartile ranges. Categorical variables were presented as
proportions. The Shapiro-Wilk test was performed as a normality test.
Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate associations between
carotid atherosclerosis and clinical variables.
Multiple linear regression was utilized to analyze associations between arterial
stiffness and clinical variables or the presence of carotid atherosclerosis.
The Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used to compare two groups of non-parametric
results. The unpaired Student t test was applied for parametric
results.
One-way ANOVA was employed to compare the groups in FCRS classification.
All tests were two-tailed, and significance was set at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Diagnostic Accuracy of On-Farm Milk Culture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated based on true positives, true negatives, false positives and false negatives as stated by [20 ] comparing results from on-farm culture of milk samples collected between April and July 2014 and reference laboratory results using the same milk samples. In addition, accuracy was calculated by dividing the number of true positives and true negatives by the total number of tests. The simple Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) was calculated using the FREQ procedure of SAS version 9.3 (SAS/STAT, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC). This parameter assumes that the two response variables (on-farm culture system and gold standard) are independent ratings, and the coefficient equals 1 when there is complete agreement between the two tests. The null hypothesis for this test is that if agreement happens due to chance the Kappa coefficient is equal to zero. Under this null hypothesis, P-values associated with this test equal or smaller than 0.05 were considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comparative PK of Metformin Formulations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The primary aim of the research described here was to compare PK profiles of metformin under fasting and fed conditions when administered as metformin eicosapentaenoate versus separately as metformin and icosapent ethyl. The profiles were compared via non-compartmental PK parameters as area under the curve AUClast and Cmax. The analysis consisted of fitting two linear mixed effects models, each using one of the primary outcomes as the response variable. The models both contained fixed effects for treatment group, study condition (fasting/fed), and the interaction of these two variables. In addition, a random participant effect was included to account for within-subject correlation between repeated measurements taken under the fasting and fed conditions. Least squares means (LSM) were obtained from the models in order to compare the effects of the drug treatment groups under each study condition and to compare the effects of the study conditions within each treatment group. LSM were compared using two-sample t-tests. Since this study was exploratory in nature, two-sided t-tests were performed for each pair-wise comparison. All analyses were carried out using SAS/STAT® software, Version 9.4 of the SAS System for Windows (Cary, NC, USA), and all tests were evaluated using significance level α = 0.05. A result was considered statistically significant if p < α.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparing Polymer Abundance in Environments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paired t-tests (with Bonferroni corrected acceptance levels) were used to determine if the relative abundance of polymers described from environmental samples were significantly different to that expected from relative global production [2 ], waste production [9 (link)] or from polymer-specific modelled release of microplastics into surface waters [3 (link)]. To ensure normality, all data were arcsine transformed before use. MANOVA (multivariate analysis of variance) was used in SAS/STAT® (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, USA) to determine if the relative abundance of polymers described differed among the three matrices, water, sediment and biota, with Tukey’s post hoc tests being used to identify where significant differences lay within polymers. Again, all data were arcsine transformed before use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Biomarker Comparison in Cartilage Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Normality was assessed with probability plots. Concentrations of biomarkers were compared between positive and negative conditions (i.e., with and without IL-1β, respectively) within each combination of culture type group (OCS and cartilage) and time point (48 versus 96 h) using Friedman’s chi-square with horse as a blocking factor (SAS/STAT, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). A logarithmic (base e) transformation was applied to the fold changes before any downstream analyses. Effects of culture type and time on the log fold changes were assessed using mixed model analysis of variance. Where appropriate P-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni’s procedure. The linear model specified culture group, time, and interaction between group and time as fixed effects. Denominator degrees of freedom for the fixed effects were approximated using the Kenward–Roger method. Horse identification was specified as the random effect. Within the specified interaction, the following comparisons were extracted: (1) time point 48 versus time point 96 for each group and (2) OCS versus cartilage at each time point. For all analysis of variance models, residuals were inspected to verify that the errors followed a normal distribution with constant variance. Values of P < 0.05 were considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Shoulder Rotator Cuff Repair Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analysis was performed using the SAS/STAT (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina, United States) statistical software.
All continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Sidak post hoc pairwise test was used to explore changes in each variable along the follow-up. The one-way ANOVA test was performed to assess differences between groups for continuous, normally distributed, and homoscedastic data. The Mann–Whitney
U-test was used otherwise. Mann–Whitney calculated with the exact method for small samples was used to explore differences according to the number of tendons reinserted, partial or total coverage of the humeral head, bursectomy, and LHB resection at 1 year. Pearson's correlation was used to explore possible correlation of outcome measures with age. Significance was considered significant for
p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!