The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

39 protocols using dpph reagent

1

Antioxidant Activity Determination in Eggs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chicken eggs were obtained at a local market (Harbin, China). Gallic acid and ABTS were purchased from Solarbio (Beijing, China). The DPPH reagent was obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). Other reagents were obtained from Aladdin (Shanghai, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antioxidant Capacity of Açaí Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antioxidant activity of the açaí extracts was measured using the conversion of the 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid) or ABTS reagent to the radical cation ABTS+• by potassium persulfate that reacts with the antioxidant compounds present in the extracts, such as polyphenols as described before [29 (link)]. In this assay adapted to a micro plate, 100 μL of açaí extract was added to ABTS+• solution and the absorption was measured spectrophotometrically at 734 nm at 30 °C 10 min after initial mixing and is presented as the Trolox equivalent used as standard reference.
The other radical scavenging assay involves the free radical 2,2-diphenyl- 1-picrylhydrazyl or DPPH•, which reacts with an antioxidant molecule resulting in a discoloration of the solution, measured at 515 nm [30 (link)], and adapted to a micro-plate UV-Vis reader. The radical 150 μM DPPH• solution was prepared by mixing the DPPH reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 80% methanol (HPLC grade, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). In a 96 well-plate, 180 μL of the radical solution was added to 20 μL of the açaí extract, standards or 70% methanol, which was used as a blank. The plate was stored in the dark for 40 min and read at 515 nm. The results were also quantified using a calibration curve of Trolox (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) over the range of 100 to 500 μM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antioxidant Activity of PAE Nanocrystals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morphological analysis has been performed with transmission electronic microscopy (TEM) by a TEM microscope JEOL JEM1400Plus (Peabody, MA, USA), hydrodynamic diameter, and ζ-potential measurements were performed through the instrument Nano ZS90 (Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK), as previous described [62 (link)].
Determination of antioxidant activity has been performed by neutralization of DPPH-free radicals (DPPH reagent from Sigma Aldrich, Italy). Briefly, 0.5 ml of samples (3 mg/ml of PAE and certain amounts of nanocrystals containing 3 mg/ml of PAE) was added to 2.5 ml of 0.1 mM DPPH-methanolic solution and vigorously shaken in the dark at room temperature. The absorbance of samples at 515 nm was measured after 30 min. Ascorbic acid and methanol were used as positive (standard) and negative controls, respectively. The antioxidant capacity (AC) of PAE, nanoCaCO3@PAE, and nanoCaCO3@PAE@CH solutions has been calculated using the following equation: AC%=Abs controlAbs sampleAbs control×100, where control is the DPPH-methanolic solution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of Local Malaysian Ingredients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw ingredients such as white rice, cassava roots, and leaves were bought locally from Penang, Malaysia. Analytical grade sulfuric acid, sodium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, sodium acetate, ferric chloride, petroleum ether, ammonium solution (28%), potassium iodide, and acetic acid glacial were purchased from Orec (Malaysia). Kjeldahl catalyst tablet, silver nitrate solution, and iodine solution were obtained from Merck (Malaysia). Boric acid, ethanol absolute, methyl spirit, and hydrochloric acid were purchased from Ever Gainful Enterprise (Malaysia). Lactic acid bacteria (BIMO‐CF) starter culture was obtained from AZ Farm (Malaysia). However, amylose standard from potato starch, DPPH reagent, 2,4,6‐Tri(2‐pyridyl)‐s‐triazine (TPTZ), Folin–Ciocalteu's reagent, chlorophyll, and gallic acid were purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich (Malaysia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

DPPH Radical Scavenging Antioxidant Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the radical scavenging antioxidant activity (RSA) of the samples, the DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) methodology proposed by Brand-Williams [43 (link)] was adapted for transparent microplates (Jet BIOFIL, Guangzhou, China) in a multi-mode reader (Synergy H1 Hybrid, Winooski, VT, USA) at 517 nm. Additionally, a calibration curve was developed for Trolox (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK) (0 to 400 µM), and the DPPH reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK) was diluted from a stock solution (81 µM) at 1:3 v/v or to an absorbance of 0.9–1.0. All data are expressed as µmol Trolox equivalents (TE) g−1 DW.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay for Essential Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DPPH assay was performed according to the method previously described by Bondet et al. [65 (link)] with slight modifications. In a clear 96-well plate, 275 μL of DPPH reagent (Sigma-Aldrich®, Cat no. D9132) (absorbance of 2.0 ± 0.1 at 517 nm) was added to 25 μL of EO sample and Trolox® (Sigma-Aldrich®, Cat no. 238831) positive control (2.0, 1.0, and 0.5 mg/mL). For the blank, ethanol was added instead of the sample. The total volume of the assay was 300 μL. The absorbance was read at 517 nm and 37 °C at the 6 min time point. The EO/Trolox® sample was read in triplicate (n = 3). The percentage radical scavenging activity (% RSA) of the samples was calculated using Equation (1).
% RSA6 min=1Abssample Absblank,
where Abssample is the absorbance signal of the EO sample and Absblank is the absorbance signal of the DPPH solution (ethanol in place of the sample) at 517 nm after 6 min. The results were expressed as the mean percentage of triplicate measurements (±standard deviation, SD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity of EJEE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine free radical scavenging activity of EJEE in vitro, cell-free chemically based DPPH assay was performed using EJEE in different concentrations (0.1, 0.05, 0.025, 0.01, 0.005, and 0.0025%, w/v), and synthetic anti-oxidant L-ascorbic acid (Sigma Aldrich) as a positive control (0.002, 0.015, 0.001, and 0.0005%, w/v). One milliliter of the test substance (0.1, 0.05, 0.025, 0.01, 0.005, and 0.0025%, w/v) was mixed with 1 mL of DPPH reagent (Sigma Aldrich; 0.002% (w/v) methanol solution). After incubation in the dark at room temperature for 30 min, the absorbance was determined on an EPOCH microplate reader at 517 nm wavelength. The tests were performed in triplicate. DPPH radical scavenger activity was calculated as follows: DPPH radical scavenger activity (%) = (A – B) / A × 100 (%), where A is the UV absorbance of the control (containing all reagents except the extract), and B is the UV absorbance of test sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay for Essential Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DPPH assay was performed according to the method previously described by Bondet et al. [43 (link)] with slight modifications. In a clear 96-well plate, 275 μL of DPPH reagent (Sigma-Aldrich®, Cat no. D9132) (absorbance of 2.0 ± 0.1 at 517 nm) was added to 25 μL of EO sample and Trolox® (Sigma-Aldrich®, Cat no. 238831) positive control (2.0, 1.0, and 0.5 mg/mL). For the blank, ethanol was added instead of the sample. The total volume of the assay was 300 μL. The absorbance was read at 517 nm and 37 °C at the 6 min time point. The EO/Trolox® sample was read in triplicate (n = 3). The % RSA of the samples was calculated using Equation (1).
% RSA6 min=1Asample Ablank
where Asample is the absorbance signal of the EO sample and Ablank is the absorbance signal of the DPPH solution (ethanol in place of the sample) at 517 nm and 6 min. The results were expressed as the mean percentage of triplicate measurements (± standard deviation, SD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay for Antioxidant Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In a brief, 20 μl of extract was mixed with 180 μl of a freshly prepared 0.1 mM DPPH reagent (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA). This reagent was made by dissolving 0.001 g of DPPH in 25 ml of absolute EtOH. The mixture was left at room temperature for 30 min after being gently shaken for 2 min. The absorbance was measured with a Microplate Reader (Tecan/Sunrise Microplate Reader, Switzerland) at 517 nm. The percentage of radical scavenging effect was calculated by following equation: Percentageofscaveringeffect%=Ab-As/Ab×100 where Ab is the absorbance of reagent blank and As is the absorbance of the reaction with the extract.
Different sample concentrations were utilized to generate antiradical curves, which were used to calculate the EC50 values (the concentration necessary to provide a 50% antioxidant activity). Antiradical curves have been created with concentration on the x-axis and scavenging ability on the y-axis. GraphPad Prism version 8.0 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diao, CA) was used to calculate the EC50 values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Spectrophotometric Analysis of Antioxidant Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All solvents were analytical grade. Agilent Cary 60 UV-Vis Spectrophotometer was used in all spectrophotometric measurements. Ascorbic acid, ferric chloride, aluminium chloride, potassium acetate, quercetin, DPPH reagent, Folin-Ciocalteau reagent, gallic acid, sodium carbonate, methanol and ethanol were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Millipore deionized water was used throughout. Thiazolyl Blue Tetrazolium Bromide (Sigma Aldrich, USA), Dimethyl Sulfoxide (Sigma Aldrich, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!