The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Mouse anti β gal

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States

The Mouse anti-β-gal is a lab equipment product that functions as a primary antibody for detecting the presence of the β-galactosidase (β-gal) enzyme in various experimental systems. It is a monoclonal antibody derived from mouse cells.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using mouse anti β gal

1

Imaging Developmental Signaling Pathways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The wing imaginal discs and pupal retinas were dissected from late third instar larvae and twenty-four hours after puparium formation (APF) pupae, respectively, then fixed for 17 min in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 4% paraformaldehyde and then blocked in PBS with 0.3% Triton X and 5% BSA (bovine serum albumin) for 30 min at room temperature and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. After washed with PBS-Triton X three times, the wing discs were incubated with secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. The stained wing discs were then mounted on the slides with glycerol. Primary antibodies: mouse anti-Cut (2B10, 1:200, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB), Iowa City, IA, USA), mouse anti-Delta (C594.B9, 1:200, DSHB), mouse anti-Notch (C17.9C6, 1:100, DSHB), mouse anti-β-gal (1:1000, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), rabbit anti-cleaved caspase-3 (1:200; Abcam). Secondary antibodies [anti-mouse Cy3 (1:1000), anti- rabbit Cy5 (1:1000)] were purchased from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA, USA). The fluorescent images were acquired by confocal microscope TCS SP5 (Imaging Core, First Core Labs, National Taiwan University College of Medicine) and Axio Imager A1 Microscope (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY, USA). Leica LAS AF Lite and Adobe Photoshop were used to analyze and process images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunostaining and in situ Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunostaining and in situ hybridization of imaginal discs were performed with standard protocols (Zhou et al., 2015 (link)). Images were captured with FV10-ASW 2.0 Olympus confocal microscope. Primary antibodies were used at the following dilutions: mouse anti-Smo (1:100; DSHB); mouse anti-β Gal (1:500; Sigma); mouse anti-En (1:50; DSHB); mouse anti-Ptc (1:200; DSHB); rabbit anti-Fg (1:200; Thermo); mouse anti-HA (F7) (1:200; Santa Cruz); anti-ubiquitin (P4D1) (1:50, Santa Cruz); mouse anti-Myc (9E10) (1:200; Santa Cruz); and DAPI (1:1000; Santa Cruz). Secondary antibodies used in this study were bought from Jackson ImmunoResearch, and were diluted at 1:500.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunostaining of Drosophila Intestines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flies were transferred overnight into a classical fly food vial containing a filter paper soaked with a solution consisting of 5% sucrose to clean the digestive tract. Then, 10–15 intestines of mated adult females were dissected in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and fixed for at least one hour at room temperature in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS. They were subsequently rinsed in PBS+0.1% Triton X-100 (PBT), permeabilized and blocked in 2% BSA PBT for one hour, and incubated with primary antibodies in 2% BSA PBT for overnight at 4°C. After one hour of washing, secondary antibodies and DAPI were applied at room temperature for two hours.
Primary antibodies used are: mouse anti-Pros (DSHB, 1:100), mouse anti-Arm (DSHB, 1:100), mouse anti-Dl (DSHB, 1:100), mouse anti-βPS (DSHB, 1:100), mouse anti-Con (DSHB, 1:4), rabbit anti-pH3 (Millipore, 1:1000), Chicken anti-GFP (Abcam, 1:1000), rabbit anti-βGal (Cappel, 1:1000), mouse anti-βGal (Sigma, 1:1000), and Rat anti-mCherry (Life Technologies, 1:500). Alexa488-, Alexa555- or Alexa647-conjugated secondary antibodies (Life Technologies) were used. Nuclei were counterstained by DAPI (Sigma, 1:10’000). All the images were taken on a Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope at BIOP in EPFL. Images were processed using Image J and Adobe Photoshop software. Shown in figures are maximal intensity projections of all the confocal z stacks.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Staining of Drosophila Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies and dilutions were used: rat anti-Twist (gift from A. Stathopoulos, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA), mouse anti-β-Gal (1:1,000, Sigma), mouse anti-Hnt (1:200) and anti-Spi (1:500, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank); rabbit anti-PH3 (1:1000) and mouse anti-Cas3 (1:1000, Cell signaling) and TRITC- or CY5-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:500; Jackson Immunoresearch). Rabbit and mouse secondary antibodies Alexa 555 and rat Alexa 647 (1:500; Invitrogen) were used. 546-labeled Phalloidin was incubated with the tissue for 20 min to visualize cell membrane. Samples were mounted in medium (Vectashield) with DAPI to stain the nucleus and analyzed by confocal microscopy (Leica SP5). Fixation and staining followed standard protocols.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunostaining of Drosophila Imaginal Discs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Briefly, larvae were dissected in 1X PBS, and imaginal discs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and incubated in primary antibody overnight, followed by incubation with fluorescently tagged secondary antibodies, counter-stained with TO-PRO-3 (Invitrogen) and mounted using vectashield anti-fade mounting medium (Vector laboratories). Primary antibodies used were: Mouse anti-Engrailed (1:50; DSHB (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank)), Rat anti-Ci (1:50; DSHB), mouse anti-Ptc (1:50, DSHB), Rabbit anti-pSmad (1:200; Cell Signaling Technology), Mouse anti-Wingless (Wg) (1:250; DSHB), Rabbit anti-Vg (1:100; gift from S Carroll); Mouse anti–β-gal (1:500; Sigma Aldrich), Rabbit anti-Caspase 3 (1:1000, Sigma Aldrich); Alexa Fluor 555, 633 secondary antibodies (1:500), Phalloidin-633 (1:100). TO-PRO-3 (Invitrogen, 1:300) was used for nuclear marking, Images were acquired with Leica-SP5 confocal microscope and processed using Leica confocal software-LAS AF and Adobe Photoshop.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Drosophila Testes Immunofluorescence Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Drosophila testes were dissected on a glass slide with dissection buffer at pH 7.2 (130 mM NaCl; 1.9 mM CaCl2; 4.7 mM KCl; 10 mM HEPES) and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min, followed by washing with PBST (1XPBS with 0.3% Triton-X) for three times, 20 min each. The testes were then incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C for overnight. Testes were washed and subsequently incubated with secondary antibodies at room temperature for 2 h. Images were taken using the Olympus FluoView ™ FV1000 Confocal Laser Microscope. ImajeJ was used to measure the distance of cells. Primary antibodies used were: rat anti-Vasa (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank [DSHB], 1:100), mouse anti-Fasciclin III (DSHB, 1:100), rabbit anti-GFP Alexa Fluor® 488 conjugate (Molecular Probes®, 1:500), mouse anti-1B1 (DSHB, 1:150), mouse anti-β-gal (β-galactosidase) (Sigma Aldrich [SA] #G4644, 1:200) and rabbit anti-pH3 (Cell Signaling Technology #9701, 1:200). Secondary antibodies used were: Alexa Fluor® 488-AffiniPure Donkey Anti-Mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc. [JIR] #715-545-150, 1:300), Alexa Fluor® 594-AffiniPure Goat Anti-Rat IgG (JIR #112-585-003, 1:300) and Goat anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor® 488 (ThermoFisher Scientific [TFS] #R37116, 1:200).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibody Detection and Nuclear Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following primary antibodies were used: rabbit anti-active human caspase 3 (Cell Signaling Technology), mouse anti-β-Gal (Sigma), rabbit anti-β-Gal (Promega), rabbit anti-human histone 3 (pSer10) (Lifespan Biosciences), anti-bromodeoxyuridine (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-Wingless (a gift from Morata G), anti-Engrailed (a gift from Sánchez-Herrero E), and anti-Brinker (a gift from Martín F). We used fluorescent secondary antibodies from Invitrogen. The TUNEL reaction was performed using an in situ apoptosis detection kit from Roche. Nuclei were detected by including propidium iodine (PI) or DAPI in the mounting media (Vectashield PI-Vector Labs). For the detection of nuclei with PI, the dissected/fixed samples were treated with RNAase (30 μg/ml) for 30 minutes at 37°C prior to immunostaining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunostaining of Wing Imaginal Discs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wing imaginal discs were dissected, fixed, and stained as previously described (Chabu and Xu, 2014; Pagliarini and Xu, 2003) . The primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-PH3 (1:1000, Sigma); rabbit anti-Diap1 (1:1000, Hermann Steller); rabbit anti-pWts (1:200, D. Pan), mouse anti-b-gal (1:1000, Sigma). Secondary antibodies were from Invitrogen. Specimens were imaged on a Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope. Images were analyzed and processed with IMARIS (Bitplane, Switzerland) and illustrator software (Adobe).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunostaining of Wing Imaginal Discs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wing imaginal discs were dissected, fixed, and stained as previously described (Chabu and Xu, 2014; Pagliarini and Xu, 2003) . The primary antibodies used were rabbit anti-PH3 (1:1000, Sigma); rabbit anti-Diap1 (1:1000, Hermann Steller); rabbit anti-pWts (1:200, D. Pan), mouse anti-b-gal (1:1000, Sigma). Secondary antibodies were from Invitrogen. Specimens were imaged on a Leica TCS SP8 confocal microscope. Images were analyzed and processed with IMARIS (Bitplane, Switzerland) and illustrator software (Adobe).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!