The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

51 protocols using prizm 6

1

Cytotoxicity Evaluation and Maximum Tolerable Concentration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The IC50 values from the MTT assay were evaluated with a non-linear regression analysis (Curve fit, GraphPad Prizm 6.01 software, GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) using sigmoidal concentration–response curves. The cell viability is presented as a percentage of the untreated control. At least four wells were seeded for every concentration. Three independent assays were performed (n = 3). The maximum tolerated concentration (MTC) for the cell lines was determined from three independent assays according to ISO 10993-5 as the maximum concentration at which at least 70% of the cells were viable (nonlin fit, range, GraphPad Prizm 6.01 software) GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). To compare the MTC values of the solvents for each cell line, the ordinary One-way ANOVA statistical analysis based on Tukey’s multiple comparisons test with a single pooled variance (GraphPad Prizm 6.01 software) GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was utilized, and p ≤ 0.05 was set as a significance level. The respiratory activity of the bacterial cultures was calculated as a percentage against the untreated control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Mouse Model Experimental Design

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Power calculations and animal numbers were determined using the information provided by ‘http://statpages.org’ and the therein linked Russ Lenth’s power and sample-size calculator obtainable through ‘http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/~rlenth/Power/index.html#Download_to_run_locally’. To achieve a true difference between means of 0.5 and a power of 0.2 testing the difference between 2 means via an unpaired, two-tailed Student’s T test, 10 mice are required in each group and there are 10 experimental groups. Statistical significance for all experimental data was determined by Student’s T test (unpaired, two-tailed) performed in Microsoft Excel, SigmaPlot or GraphPad Prizm 6 with a significance threshold values of p<0.05. Except where indicated, all experiments were repeated at least 3 times. Data are presented as mean values with SD. Statistical significance for all experimental data was determined by Student’s T test (unpaired, two-tailed) performed in Microsoft Excel, SigmaPlot or GraphPad Prizm 6 with a significance threshold values of p<0.05. All experiments were repeated at least 3 times. Data are presented as mean values plotted with SD unless otherwise noted in legend.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Serum IL-1β in Canine Epilepsy and TBI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed using statistics program package SAS®, version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). IL-1β data did not follow a normal distribution. Therefore, nonparametric statistical tests were used and differences between all the groups were evaluated using Kruskal–Wallis test and Bonferroni’s post hoc correction. First, all groups of the animals were compared to healthy dogs and to each other. Afterwards all epileptic dogs together were compared to TBI and healthy group. Mean values with standard deviation were calculated for each evaluated group. The graphical presentation of the results was done using GraphPad Prizm 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, USA).
To associate the IL-1β concentrations in serum to the important parameters in epilepsy, linear regression analysis was performed for the following variables: duration of the disease, seizure frequency, time point between sample collection and the last seizure event. The relationship was described with the coefficient of determination, R-squared (R2). The levels of IL-1β were compared between groups with different seizure types respectively seizure severity (single, cluster seizures or status epilepticus) applying one-way ANOVA test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using a Graph Pad-Prizm 6 (GraphPad Software La Jolla, CA) software. The statistical significance was evaluated using Student’s t-test or a Two-Way ANOVA followed by a Bonferroni’s post- hoc test. The data were considered to be statistically significant when the p-value was less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating Factors in Scientific Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data are presented as medians and interquartile ranges. Differences between individual groups were tested using the Kruskal–Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple comparison tests (GraphPad Prizm 6; GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). The relationships between factors were evaluated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients. Values of P < 0.05 were considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Analyzing Myosin 1C and CD Markers in Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed in GraphPad Prizm 6 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA) and R (R Core Team, 2019) with basic package “stats” ver. 3.6.0 (R Core Team, 2019), additional package “PMCMR” ver. 4.3 and graphic package “ggplot2” ver. 3.3.1. To analyze the results, Kruskal—Wallis analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the differences in the level of myosin 1C isoform A or CD-positive cell percentages at different cancer stages. For pairwise comparisons, we performed the Conover-Iman test from the “PMCMR” package with a 0.95 confidence level. To measure the relationship between the isoform A level and CD-positive percentage, we calculated Spearman correlation coefficients for each cancer stage. Images were finalized in AdobePhotoshop Software (Adobe Inc., San Jose, CA, USA)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Analysis of Cell Viability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using a Graph Pad-Prizm 6 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA) software. The normality of data was tested using either a D'Agostino & Pearson normality test or Shapiro-Wilk normality test prior to undertaking parametric testing of statistical analysis. The statistical significance was evaluated using Student’s t-test or a One-Way ANOVA followed by a Tukey’s post- hoc test, unless and otherwise specified. Each experiment was repeated at least n = 3 times unless and otherwise specified. The data were considered statistically significant when the p-value was less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparative Analysis of Therapeutic Interventions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data are presented as mean and standard deviation. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prizm 6 software (Graph Pad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Differences between the two groups were compared using the Student’s t-test. When more than two groups were compared, we used one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by multiple pair-wise comparisons using the Student-Newman-Keuls test. Survival curves were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier survival analysis. p values < 0.05 were considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Oxaliplatin Effects on Macaque Physiology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Changes over time in the oxaliplatin-treated macaques were analyzed using a one-way repeated measures analysis of variance followed by Bonferoni’s test for post hoc comparisons (Graphpad Prizm 6, Graph Pad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). For statistical analysis, differences were considered significant at P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Analysis of Biological Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results were expressed as group mean ± standard error of mean. All results were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance, followed by Tukey's multiple comparison tests. P <0.05 were considered significant. The software programs used for data analyzing and making graphs were Excel 2010 and the GraphPad Prizm 6 (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, California, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!