The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using software

1

APOL1 Genotyping Protocol for Risk Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PCR products were generated from primers [AAAACTGGCACGATAAAGGC and CATATCTCTCCTGGTGGCTG] designed using MacVector software (MacVector, Inc.).24 (link) Sanger sequencing of exon 6 of APOL1 gene was performed by the Quintara Biosciences. Sequencing chromatograms were analyzed using MacVector software (MacVector, Inc.) and APOL1 genotypes determined separately by two persons. Participants’ APOL1 genotypes were scored as G0/G0, G1/G0, G2/G0, G1/G1, G2/G2, or G1/G2. Based on scoring, participants were divided in two groups, APOL1 risk genotype group and APOL1 reference group. Participants were assigned to APOL1 risk genotype group if having 2 risk alleles (G1/G1, G2/G2, G1/G2) or 1 risk allele (G1/G0, G2/G0, G0/G0), and to APOL1 reference group if having 0 risk variants (G0/G0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

APOL1 Genotyping Protocol for Risk Stratification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polymerase chain reaction products were generated from primers (AAAACTGGCACGATAAAGGC and CATATCTCTCCTGGTGGCTG) designed using MacVector software (MacVector, Inc.).
29 (link) Sanger sequencing of exon 6 of APOL1 gene was performed by the Quintara Biosciences. Sequencing chromatograms were analyzed using MacVector software (MacVector, Inc.) and APOL1 genotypes determined separately by 2 people. Participants' APOL1 genotypes were scored as G0/G0, G1/G0, G2/G0, G1/G1, G2/G2, or G1/G2. Based on scoring, participants were divided in 2 groups, APOL1 risk genotype group and APOL1 reference group. Participants were assigned to APOL1 risk genotype group if having 2 risk alleles (G1/G1, G2/G2, G1/G2) or 1 risk allele (G1/G0, G2/G0, G0/G0) and to APOL1 reference group if having 0 risk variants (G0/G0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Sanger Sequencing of TERT Promoter Hotspots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sanger sequencing for the −124C>T and
−146C>T hotspot sites of the TERT promoter was
performed as previously described.28 (link) Sequences of the forward and reverse strands were analyzed
using MacVector software (MacVector, Inc).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Amplifying PRKD Kinase Domains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We employed primer sets that amplify the entire kinase domains of PRKD1, PRKD2 and PRKD3. The primers pairs were designed as previously described10 (link) (Supplementary Figure 1 and Supplementary Table 1) and the specificity was also tested using in a previously described in silico method19 (link) (https://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgPcr). PCR amplification of 10ng of genomic DNA was performed using the AmpliTaq 360 Master Mix Kit (Life Technologies, Norwalk, CT) on a Veriti Thermal Cycler (Life Technologies). The thermocycling protocol consisted of an initial incubation step of 95°C for 5 min and then 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, 56°C for 30 sec, 72°C for 30 sec, and one final extension step of 72°C for 10 min. PCR fragments were purified with ExoSAP-IT (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA), and the sequencing reactions were performed on an ABI 3730 capillary sequencer using ABI BigDye Terminator chemistry (v3.1, Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequences of the forward and reverse strands were analyzed using MacVector software (MacVector, Inc, Cary, NC).10 (link) All analyses were performed in duplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Sanger Sequencing of TERT Promoter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Recurrent hotspot mutations in the promoter of
TERT, leading to upregulated telomerase expression and
decreased cell death, have been documented in many cancer types [28 (link)]. Since the TERTpromoter is typically not covered by whole exome sequencing analysis, Sanger
sequencing of the TERT promoter region was performed in
five cases. Primer sets that amplify the −124C>T and
−146C>T hotspot sites of the TERT promoter
were employed for Sanger sequencing as previously described [31 (link)]. Sequences of the forward and reverse strands
were analyzed using MacVector software (MacVector, Inc). All analyses were
performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Sequencing and Alignment of Bacterial Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nucleotide sequences were determined by sequencing the purified amplicons generated from the second rounds of PCR. DNA sequencing was performed at the Virginia Biocomplexity Institute (Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA). To sequence the 16S region, primers P1A, 16S-SR, P5, F5, R5, and R3 were used. SecY region was sequenced using primers SecYG-SF1, SecYG-SR1, SecYF1(III), and SecYR1(III). Primers M13F (5′-GTA AAA CGA CGG CCA GT-3′) and T7 (5′-TAA TAC GAC TCA CTA TAG GG-3′) were used for sequencing tuf gene. Sequences were aligned using the T-coffee method (Notredame et al. 2000 (link)) from the MacVector software (MacVector Inc., NC).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Poly(cis-1,4-isoprene) Utilization Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA manipulations, including total DNA isolation and nucleotide sequencing, were performed as previously described [25 (link)]. Nucleotide sequence analysis was performed using MacVector software (MacVector, Inc., Cary, NC), as previously described [26 (link)]. The genome sequence of NBRC 15,532 was used to identify poly(cis-1,4-isoprene) utilization genes in the NBRC 15,532 genome database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_BDBJ00000000.1, accessed on 15 March 2021). Signal sequences were predicted using SignalP 6.0 software (https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/service.php?SignalP, accessed on 14 November 2022) [27 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Single-cell sequencing of antigen-specific B cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Six days after adoptive transfer, individual transduced SWHEL B cells were recovered from the spleens of host mice into 96-well PCR plates (Bio-Rad) as GFP+ve cells that bound HEL conjugated to Alexa Fluor 647 (30 (link)). Following cell lysis and protein digestion, the VDJH-region of the single SWHEL allele present in each well was amplified by nested PCR, as described (30 (link)). PCR products from ≤60 wells per host in which amplification was successful were Sanger sequenced by Macrogen (South Korea). Mutations where secondary peaks formed <30% of the signal were confirmed using Sequencher software (version 5.1, Gene Codes Corporation). Processed sequences were sorted into phylogenetic trees (using neighbor joining and uncorrected ‘p’) with MacVector software (version 12.7.5 MacVector Inc) to check for clonal dynasties, then collated for a window spanning nucleotides 17–539 (counting from the translation start ATG codon as bases 1–3) using custom Microsoft Excel spreadsheets (version 15.23 for Mac, Microsoft Corporation). Statistical analyses of mutation data exported from Excel were performed using Prism software (version 7.0a for Mac, GraphPad Software).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Phylogenetic Analysis of LASV and LCMV Z Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The full-length amino acid sequences of Z proteins from diverse LASV isolates and LCMV strains were obtained from the GenBank database and were analyzed via multiple protein alignment and phylogenetic tree using the MacVector Software (MacVector, Inc., Apex, NC, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Targeted Sequencing of TP53 and PIK3CA in TNBC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We employed primer sets that amplify the entire coding region of TP53 and the hotspot mutation sites in exons 9 and 20 of the PIK3CA gene. The selection of these two genes was based on the observation that in large whole exome sequencing studies of TNBCs, TP53 and PIK3CA were found to be the most frequently mutated genes in these tumours.33 (link),35 (link) We designed the primer pairs as described previously45 (link) (for the primer sets used, please see Table S1). PCR amplification of 10 ng of genomic DNA was performed using the AmpliTaq 360 Master Mix Kit (Life Technologies) on a Veriti Thermal Cycler (Life Technologies). The thermocycling protocol consisted of an initial incubation step of 95°C for 5 min and then 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 56°C for 30 s, 72°C for 30 s and one final extension step of 72°C for 10 min. PCR fragments were purified with ExoSAP-IT (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and the sequencing reactions were performed on an ABI 3730 capillary sequencer using ABI BigDye Terminator chemistry (version 3.1; Life Technologies), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequences of the forward and reverse strands were analysed using MacVector software (MacVector, Inc., Cary, NC, USA).45 (link) All analyses were performed in duplicate. Insertions and deletion were annotated manually.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!