The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Fraction collector

Manufactured by Bio-Rad
Sourced in United States

The Fraction Collector is a laboratory device designed to automatically collect and store fractions of a sample as it elutes from a chromatography column or other separation system. It enables the systematic and accurate collection of individual sample components for further analysis or purification.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using fraction collector

1

Ribosome Profiling of CTIF-Expressing Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEF-eIF2α (A/A) cells were cultured in three 150-mm culture dishes. When indicated, the cells were transiently transfected with plasmid expressing either GST-CTIF-WT or GST-CTIF(54–598). Two days after transfection, cells were washed with 10 ml of ice-cold PBS containing 100 μg ml−1 cycloheximide. After washing, cell extraction was resuspended with 1 ml of lysis buffer (50 mM MOPS, 15 mM MgCl2, 150 mM NaCl, 100 μg ml−1 cycloheximide, 0.5% Triton X-100, 1 mg ml−1 Heparin, 0.2 U μl−1 RNase inhibitor, 2 mM PMSF and 1 mM benzamidine) and centrifuged. After harvesting, soluble fraction was loaded onto the top of the pre-established sucrose gradient (10 ml of 10∼50%), and centrifuged at 36,000 r.p.m. in a Beckman SW-41 Ti rotor for 2 h at 4 °C. After ultracentrifugation, gradients were fractionated and collected using the ISCO tube piercer (Brandel) and fraction collector (Bio-Rad). Fractions were analysed by western blotting, where the signal intensities of each fraction were quantitated and analysed using the Multi Gauge software (version 3.0, Fujifilm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Heparin-Based Serum Fractionation and Endotoxin Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
25 mL human serum from freshly drawn blood was pumped (0.5 mL/min) through a column filled with 5 mL heparin immobilized adsorbent (Heparin Sepharose 6 fast flow, GE Healthcare, Chicago, USA). To remove all non-heparin-binding substances from the adsorbent surface, the column was rinsed with 10 mL physiological saline solution. The heparin-bound plasma components were eluted from the column in two steps. Using 10 mL of 0.5 M NaCl solution, first those substances with a low to medium binding constant to heparin were eluted from the column. Substances strongly bound to heparin were finally eluted with 10 mL 2.2 M NaCl solution. The eluates were separated into 1 mL fractions using a fraction collector from (Bio-Rad, California, USA). Protein concentration of each fractions was analyzed with a Cobas c311 analyzer from Roche (Basel, Switzerland) with according test reagents. Fractions of each salt concentration were pooled and desalinated and concentrated with VIVASPIN 20 with a molecular cut off of 3 kDa (Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany). The concentrate of each fraction was washed once and finally diluted to a volume of 1.5 mL with ringer solution. Finally, 1:10 with ringer solution diluted serum and the two heparin-binding serum fractions (0.5, 2.2 M NaCl) were spiked with 5 ng/mL LPS (E. coli) and their endotoxin activity was determined by the LAL test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Polysome Profiling of Protein Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were washed with cold (4°C) PBS and incubated in PBS containing 10 μg/mL cycloheximide for 5 min, then harvested and centrifuged at 500xg. Cell pellets were lysed in 1 mL of ice-cold lysis buffer (140 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT, 20 mM Tris, pH 8.5, 20 mM MgCl2, 0.5% NP-40, 0.5 U/mL RNasin) and mechanically disrupted using a 10-gauge needle. The lysates were centrifuged at 14000 g for 20 min. The final supernatant was layered onto 10 mL of 10-50% linear sucrose gradient. Centrifugation was performed at 35 000 rpm for 3 h using a Beckman Coulter SW40Ti rotor. Fractions were eluted from the top of the gradient using a BioRad fraction collector. About 200 μL fractions were collected and OD was measured at A 260 nm to obtain the polysome profile.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Polysome Profiling of WT and TAZ KO MEFs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wild-type (WT) and TAZ KO mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) were seeded onto three 150-mm culture dishes at a density of 1.5 × 106 cells and 3.75 × 106 cells per dish, respectively. Two days after seeding, the MEF were washed with 10 mL of PBS and incubated in 100 μg/mL cycloheximide diluted in PBS at 37 °C for 20 min. After incubation, the cells were scraped, transferred to a conical tube, and centrifuged at 750 × g for 3 min. The supernatant was discarded and the pellets resuspended in 1 mL of lysis buffer (50 mM MOPS, 15 mM MgCl2, 150 mM NaCl, 100 μg/mL cycloheximide, 0.5% Triton X-100, 1 mg/mL heparin, 0.2 U/μL RNase inhibitor, 2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), and 1 mM benzamidine) and centrifuged. For fractionation, a sucrose gradient (10 mL of 10–50%) was established and the soluble fraction of the lysed sample was loaded onto the sucrose gradient and centrifuged at 160,000 × g at 4 °C for 2 h (SW-41 Ti rotor, Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA). After centrifugation, the gradients were fractionated using an ISCO tube piercer (Brandel, Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and collected using a fraction collector (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). cDNA was synthesized from total RNA isolated from each fraction using M-MLV reverse transcriptase and the mRNA of target genes was amplified by PCR. Amplicons were visualised and assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Polysome Profiling by Sucrose Gradient Centrifugation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polysome profiles were obtained byt reating cells with 0.1 mg/mL cycloheximide (CHX) for 10 min at 37°C, washed twice with ice-cold PBS-CHX (phosphate buffered saline containing 0.1 mg/mL CHX), and harvested using polysome lysis buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.4% IGEPAL, 50 μg/mL CHX, protease inhibitors, and RNaseIn). Lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 13,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Equal amounts of clarified lysates based on the absorption at 260 nm were layered onto 10%–50% sucrose gradient (prepared in 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgCl2, 50 μg/mL CHX) and centrifuged in an SW41-Ti rotor at 40,000 rpm for 2 h at 4°C. Fractions were collected using a Bio-Rad fraction collector, and the amount of total RNA in each fraction was measured using a NanoDrop spectrophotometer [66 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Polysaccharide Purification via DEAE Chromatography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crude polysaccharide was subjected to anion-exchange chromatography using a DEAE Sephacel resin (# 17-0500-01, Cytiva) column (2.5 × 20 cm, # Bio-Rad Laboratories) equilibrated with 50 mM sodium acetate. Fifty millimolar sodium acetate with 3 M NaCl was used as second mobile phase to generate a salt gradient. The gradient produced by a gradient mixer (# GM-1, Pharmacia Fine Chemicals) was applied over 24 h and ranged from 0 to 3 M NaCl in 50 mM sodium acetate. The flow rate was set to 3.5 ml/10 min/fraction collected in the fraction collector (# 2110, Bio-Rad Laboratories). Fractions of different anionic content were monitored by DMB (# Sigma-Aldrich) (Fig. S1A).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Purification of Fn3 Protein from BL21(DE3)

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The biomass of BL21 (DE3) strain containing the pET16b:fn3 plasmid was resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 5 mM Tris-HCl, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 1 mM PMSF, 5 mM DTT, pH 8.0) containing lysozyme (1 mg/ml), 0.5% Triton X-100 and 20 mM 2-mercaptoethanol and was sonicated. Insoluble particles were removed by centrifugation (7500 g, 30 min, 4 °C). The resulting lysate was filtered using a 0.22 μm pore size Millex-GP.
Protein isolation and purification were performed using a BioLogic LP chromatography system equipped with a fraction collector (Bio-Rad, USA). The clarified lysate was loaded onto a Bio-Scale™ Mini Profinity™ IMAC Cartridge (5 ml, Bio-Rad, USA), then equilibrated and washed with the lysis buffer, followed by another washing with the buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 5 mM Tris-HCl, 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM imidazole, 1 mM PMSF, 5 mM DTT, pH 8.0). The bound protein was eluted from the columns with buffer containing 300 mM imidazole. For further purification of the protein, dialysis was performed in PBS buffer containing 10% glycerol and 1 mM PMSF. The concentration of the isolated protein was measured by Qubit fluorimeter (Invitrogen, USA). The average yield of purified protein was approximately 20 mg per liter of E. coli culture. The purified protein was stored at −80 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Purification of Polysaccharides from I. badionotus and H. floridana

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The purification was performed using the method previously reported (Dwivedi et al., 2021 (link)). The crude polysaccharides of I. badionotus and H. floridana were subjected to anion-exchange chromatography using a DEAE Sephacel (# 17-0500-01, Cytiva, Marlborough, MA, USA) column (2.5 x 20 cm, # Bio-Rad Laboratories) equilibrated with 0.1 mol/dm3 sodium acetate buffer (pH 6.0) with 3 mol/dm3 NaCl as the second mobile phase to generate a salt gradient. The gradient produced by a gradient mixer (# GM-1, Pharmacia Fine Chemicals, Uppsala, Sweden) was applied over 24 h and ranged from 0 to 3 mol/dm3 NaCl in 0.1 mol/dm3 sodium acetate. The flow rate was set to 18 cm3/10 min/fraction for IbSF and 9 cm3/10 min/fraction for HfSF and the fractions were collected in a fraction collector (# 2110, Bio-Rad Laboratories). Fractions of different anionic content were monitored by DMB (Farndale et al., 1982 (link)). The IbSF and HfSF fractions were also monitored for the presence of hexoses using phenol-H2SO4 reactions (DuBois et al., 1956 ), uronic acids using the Carbazole reaction (Cesaretti et al., 2003 ) and sialic acids using the Ehrlich assay (Warren, 1959 (link)) (data not shown).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Molecular Weight Distribution Analysis of PPH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the molecular weight distribution of PPH, the size exclusion chromatography (SEC) was performed according to Sae-Leaw et al. [27 ] using mixed standards with the molecular weight of 12.4 kDa (cytochrome c from horse heart), 29 kDa (carbonic anhydrase from bovine erythrocytes), 66 kDa (albumin, bovine serum), 150 kDa (alcohol dehydrogenase from yeast), and 200 kDa (β-amylase from sweet potato). Void volume was measured using blue dextran (2,000,000 Da). All samples (8.0 mg/mL) was diluted using a phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH 7.4). Chromatographic separations of standards and samples (1,000 μL) were performed with a Sigma Andrich Superdex® column (200 Increase 10/300 GL Cytiva, 28-9909-44, column L × I.D. 30 cm × 10 mm, 8.6 μm particle size). A low-pressure chromatography system (<1.3 mPa) and a fraction collector (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) were used. For elution, PBS was used at a flow rate of 0.4 mL/min. Fractions (3 mL) were taken for absorbance measurement at 220 and 280 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Protein Fractionation by Size Exclusion Chromatography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein fractionation by GFC was employed according to 21 . Acetate buffer (0.02 M) at pH 5 as the mobile phase or elution buffer was applied to the 1.5 × 32 cm Sephadex G-25 column. Flow rate of the elution buffer was set to 1 mL/1 min and 2 mL of PMFPAE at 250 mg/mL was applied on the top of the column. The eluant (2 mL each) was collected using the fraction collector (BioRad, USA). Thirty fractions were collected and optical density (OD) at 280 nm were measured using a spectrophotometer (UV mini-1240, Shimadzu-Germany). The fractionation process was repeated and fractions with similar OD reading were pooled. Pooled samples (P 1 to P 6 ) were freeze-dried, weighed and stored at -20 °C until use.
Pharmacognosy Journal, Vol 14, Issue 1, Jan-Feb, 2022
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!