The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

β actin monoclonal antibody

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Germany

The β-actin monoclonal antibody is a laboratory reagent used in various research applications. It specifically binds to the beta-actin protein, a ubiquitous cytoskeletal protein found in eukaryotic cells. This antibody can be utilized in techniques such as Western blotting, immunocytochemistry, and immunohistochemistry to detect and quantify the expression of beta-actin.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

62 protocols using β actin monoclonal antibody

1

Antibody Panel for Parkinson's Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following antibodies were used in this study: α-synuclein monoclonal antibody (BD Biosciences; #610787, San Diego, CA), α-synuclein monoclonal antibody #274, phosphorylated α-synuclein polyclonal antibody (Abcam, ab59264; Cambridge, MA), GFP (c-terminus) polyclonal antibody (IMGENEX, #5127A; San Diego, CA), GFP (N-terminus) polyclonal antibody (Cell signaling Technology, #2555; Beverly, MA), GFP (N-terminus) monoclonal antibody (Abcam, ab127417), GCase monoclonal antibody 8E4 (from J. Barranger, University of Pittsburgh), GCase polyclonal antibody (Sigma, G4171; St. Louis, MO), p62 monoclonal antibody (BD Transduction laboratories, #c2384-0B; Swampscott, MA), ubiquitin polyclonal antibodies (Dako; Glostrup, Denmark and Chemicon; Temecula, CA), and β-actin monoclonal antibody (Sigma). Fluorescence dye-conjugated goat anti-rabbit IgG was purchased from Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA). The Q tracker 858 cell labeling kit was purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of WT1 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein collection was performed using reagent TRIzol according to the manufacturer's instructions. Protein samples (50 μg) were electrophoresed on 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Immunodetection of WT1 protein isoform was performed using a WT1C19 polyclonal antibody (COOH-terminal binding, Santa Cruz Biotechnology); the β-actin monoclonal antibody was obtained from Sigma Chemical (St Louis, MO), and anti-mouse and anti-rabbit antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase were purchased from Bio-Rad. Protein bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence using Roche Lumi-Light Western blotting substrate. Subsequently, the bands obtained were analyzed by densitometry using the ImageJ program (https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/download.html). The density of each band was normalized with its respective value of β-actin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Signaling Pathways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell pellets were lysed with ice-cold lysis buffer (1% Triton X, 150 mmol/L NaCl, 25 mmol/L Tris HCl, 0.4 mmol/L NaVO4, 0.4 mmol/L NaF, and protease inhibitor cocktail from Sigma) and total protein concentration was determined using Bio-Rad DC Protein Assay reagents (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Protein samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and blotted onto nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked in either 5% non-fat dry milk (Bio-Rad) or 5% BSA (HyClone) and probed with phospho-ILK (Ser 246; Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), ILK (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), phospho-AKT (Ser 473; Cell Signaling), AKT (Cell Signaling), full caspase-3 (Cell Signaling), or cleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling) primary antibodies. Membranes were then incubated with mouse or rabbit IgG horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-linked secondary antibodies (Cell Signaling) followed by enhanced chemiluminescence and autoradiography. Bands were imaged with a FluorChem system (Alpha Innotech Corporation, San Leandro, CA, USA) and the signal intensity of each band was quantified using AlphaEaseFC software. All membranes were reprobed with β-actin monoclonal antibody (Sigma) as a normalizing control. Western blot images with molecular weight markers are shown in Figure S15.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Expression Analysis by Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extraction, quantification, and western blot was performed as previously described (19 (link)). The membranes were probed with SLC12A6 (Boster Bio, Pleasanton, CA), MMP-3 (Boster Bio), SSX2IP (Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO), TRAIL-R4 (Boster Bio), GBP1 (Novus), GUCY1A3 (Novus) or TRPC4 (Boster Bio) primary antibodies. Membrane developing was conducted by enhanced chemiluminescence and autoradiography in an SRX-101A film processor (Konika Minolta, Japan). The ImageLab software was used to quantify the density of bands. All membranes were reprobed with a β-actin monoclonal antibody (Sigma) as a loading control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of AKR1B10 and Acrolein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Culture cells were lysed in lysis buffer (Roche, IN) and centrifuged at 12,000g for 10 min to collect soluble proteins. Tissues were homogenized on ice in 300µl of 50mM Tris.Cl buffer (pH 7.0), followed by centrifugation at 12,000g for 10 min to collect supernatants. For Western blot, proteins (30 ~ 50 µg) were separated on 12% SDS-PAGE and blotted onto a pure nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad, CA) at 180 mA for 2 hours. After being blocked with 5% skim milk in PBS at room temperature for 45 min, membranes were incubated with AKR1B10 (1:500) or acrolein (1: 500, Advanced Targeting System, CA) antibodies at 4oC overnight, followed by incubation with goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG (1:2000; Sigma, MO) for 1 hour. Antibody binding signals were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence system (Pierce, IL). Protein loading amount was normalized by re-probing the membrane with β-actin monoclonal antibody (1:40,000; Sigma, MO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive List of Reagents Used

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The reagents used in this study were purchased from the following suppliers: Prestained protein markers and Bio-Rad assay reagents and standards (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA); Protran BA83 Nitrocellulose membrane (Whatman Inc, Sanford, ME); Pierce ECL (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL); protease inhibitor cocktail tablets complete EDTA-free and PhosStop (Roche Applied Biosciences, Indianapolis, IN); antibiotic-antimycotic, and trypsin–EDTA (Invitrogen Life Technologies Inc, Carlsbad, CA); Blue X-Ray film (Phenix Research Products, Hayward, CA); fetal bovine serum (HyClone, Logan, UT); and tissue culture dishes and plates (Corning Inc, Corning, NY). Antagonists/inhibitors for EP2 (AH6809), EP4 (AH23848) were purchased from Sigma (Sigma-Aldrich, St-Louis, MO). All other antibodies used in this study were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA), Chemicon International (Billerica, MA), or Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA) except β-actin monoclonal antibody (Sigma-Aldrich), goat anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Kirkegaard & Perry Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MA). The chemicals used were molecular biological grade from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA) or Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunoblot Analysis of AHR38, EcR, and USP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein levels of AHR38, EcR and USP were identified by means of immunoblot. After treatment in a passive lysis buffer, 10 μg protein was separated on 4–12% Tris-glycine gels (Invitrogen) and then transferred to PVDF membranes (Invitrogen). The following antibodies were used: anti-His antiserum (Abcam, ab18184) for AHR38-His; anti-Flag antiserum (Abcam, ab18230) for EcR-Flag and USP-Flag; β-actin monoclonal antibody (Sigma, A5441) for actin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was extracted with RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) and the concentration was assessed by Coomassie Brilliant Blue R250 staining. After electrophoresis in Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels (SDS-PAGE), the protein was transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes and then incubated with anti-calponin 2 monoclonal antibody 1D2, produced at Wayne State University, USA), PCNA polyclonal antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, USA), p-Erk1/2/Erk1/2 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, USA), p-JNK/JNK antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, USA; Abcam, England), p-p38/p38 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, USA), p-STAT/STAT antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, USA), p-AKT/AKT antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, USA; Abcam, England), p-p65/p65 NF-κB antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, USA), E-cadherin antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, USA) and β-actin monoclonal antibody (Sigma, USA) as internal control at 4°C overnight. After washes, secondary antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Zhong Shan Goldenbridge Biotech, China) was used for chemiluminescence (Bio-rad, CA, USA) detection of the specific proteins. Densitometry quantification of the bands was performed with Quantity One software (Bio-rad, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein expression analysis by Western blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell protein was extracted using RIPA lysis buffer (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA) and complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Diagnostics) at 4°C. Protein was separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and then transferred to 0.45-μm PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad, CA, USA). After blocking using 5% non-fat milk, membranes were incubated with AKT, p-AKT (ser473), STAT3, p-STAT3 (ser727), Survivin, Cyclind1, and Bcl-2 (all from Cell Signaling Technology) antibodies overnight at 4°C followed by incubation with the appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature. Blotted membranes were stripped and re-blotted with a β-actin monoclonal antibody (Sigma) as a loading control. Blots were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) detection systems (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Bands densitometry were analyzed by Image J software (National Institutes of Health, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Cell-Surface Biotinylation of ClC-1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell-surface biotinylation was carried out with the Pierce Cell Surface Protein Isolation Kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). tsA201 cells were transfected with pRcCMV-hClC-1, T335N, or both constructs (10 μg each). One day after transfection, cell-surface proteins were labeled with sulfosuccinimidyl-2-(biotinamido)ethyl-1,3-dithiopropionate (Sulfo-NHS-SS-biotin). In brief, cells were washed with ice-cold PBS twice, and Sulfo-NHS-SS-biotin was added and incubated at 4°C, with constant rotation for 30 min. Excess biotin was quenched with quenching solution. Cells were treated with lysis buffer and centrifuged at 10,000 g for 2 min at 4°C. Clear supernatant was reacted with immobilized NeutrAvidin gel slurry in columns to isolate surface proteins. Columns were washed and protein eluted in sample buffer that contained DTT. Surface proteins were separated on a SDS-PAGE gel, and samples (1 μg) were analyzed by Western blotting using a monoclonal anti–ClC-1 antibody (MyBiosource). Filters were also immunoblotted with β-actin monoclonal antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) as control. Total protein density was standardized as the ratio of input signal to β-actin signal, normalized to WT control. Surface protein density was measured as the ratio of surface signal to cognate total β-actin signal, followed by normalization to WT control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!