The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using t4 dna ligase and buffer

1

Arrayed CRISPR gRNA Cloning Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Individual gRNAs were cloned in an arrayed format using a Golden Gate-based approach. We designed primers encoding a gRNA with BbsI overhangs and an additional G for hU6 RNApolIII transcription (Forward: 5′-CACCGNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN-3′ and Reverse: 5′-AAACNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNC-3′), annealed by boiling and slowly cooling to room temperature, and then ligated duplexes with a BbsI entry vector, BbsI-HF (NEB), T4 DNA ligase and buffer (NEB), 1X BSA (NEB) for 30X cutting (37°C) and ligating (16°C) cycles, before heat-shock transformation of DH5-α E. coli (NEB). All gRNA sequences used can be found online through the BE-view app.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Inducible CRISPR-dCas9 Epigenome Editing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) targeting each peak were designed using the online tool http://crispr.org (Supplementary Table 2). Two sgRNAs were designed for the CCND2 promoter as a positive control and the non-targeting sgRNA for Gal4 of the yeast S.cerevisiae as a negative control.
The vector used was the inducible Lenti-CRISPR-dCas9-KRABv2. The original LentiCRISPRv2 vector (Addgene 52961, USA) was modified and kindly supplied by Dr Niklas Feldhahn (Imperial College London). The plasmid was digested with Esp31 (New England Biolabs), removing a 2 kb stuffer.
The sgRNA oligos were phosphorylated and annealed using the T4 Ligation Buffer (New England Biolabs) and T4 PNK (New England Biolabs). The sgRNAs were then ligated with the digested plasmid using the T4 DNA ligase and buffer (New England Biolabs). Reactions were carried out following the Zhang Lab General Cloning Protocol (Addgene).
Sanger sequencing was used to confirm the exact sequence of the cloned sgRNA (GeneWiz Ltd UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

CRISPR Pooled Library Generation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single pGG vectors were generated using the same oligonucleotide ligation approach described above. Primer sequences can be found in S1 Table. Arrays were then generated using golden gate assembly. Briefly, 150 ng of each pGG-gRNA plasmid was combined with 150 ng of the appropriate pACPT vector, followed by addition of 1 uL of BsaI (New England BioLabs), 1 uL of T4 DNA Ligase and Buffer (New England BioLabs) and water to a total of 20 uL. Golden gate assembly was then carried out using the following thermocycling protocol: (37°C 5 minutes, 16°C 10 minutes) x10, 50°C 5 minutes, 80°C for 5 minutes and then cooled to 4°C. One uL of 25 mM ATP and 1 uL of Plasmid Safe (Epicentre) were then added to the reaction and incubated for 1 hour at 37°C. Assembled plasmids were then transformed into TOP10 bacteria (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and plated on spectinomycin selection plates with X-gal and mini-preps performed on white colonies using the GeneJET Plasmid Miniprep Kit (Life Technologies). The plasmids were then analyzed by Sanger sequencing to confirm proper gRNA array assembly.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Optimized Workflow for Bacterial Genome Annotation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The bacterial strains and oligonucleotides used in this study are listed in Supplementary Tables S1, S2, respectively. oligonucleotides for cloning were ordered from Life Technologies 1 and oligonucleotides for next-generation sequencing libraries preparation were ordered from Integrated DNA Technologies.2 We used the GoTaq® Green Master Mix (Promega) for colony PCRs; and Q5 hot start DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) for all other PCR reactions. DNA fragments were purified with the QIAquick PCR purification or Gel extraction kit (Qiagen). T4 DNA ligase and buffer were purchased from NEB. Plasmid and genomic DNA isolations were carried out with the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit and the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen), respectively.
The DvH genome annotation used in this study includes protein-coding genes that are not in the current version in GenBank (GCF_000195755.1). These additional genes were identified by transcriptomics and proteomics evidence (Price et al., 2011 (link)), and each starts with the systematic name “DORF.” These annotations are included in the DvH information at MicrobesOnline (Dehal et al., 2010 (link)).
The genes neighborhood comparison shown in this study was achieved using the BioCyc Database collection and the Ensembl Bacteria browser (Karp et al., 2019 (link); Howe et al., 2020 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Culturing and Molecular Techniques for P. gingivalis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Porphyromonas gingivalis ATCC 33277 was cultured in Gifu anaerobe medium (GAM Nissui Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan), and on GAM blood agar. E. coli DH5α and pSAM_Bt were cultured in LB broth and agar from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). Sheep blood was from Lampire Biological Laboratories (Pipersville, PA). Gentamicin, erythromycin, ampicillin, dichloromethane, sodium sulfate and analytical nicotine standards were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). GeneReleaser® came from Bio Ventures, Inc. (Murfreesboro, TN). All primers were from Biosynthesis Inc. (Lewiston, TX). Lonza flash gels came from Lonza (Rockland, ME). Wizard SV and PCR cleanup kit were from Promega (Madison, WI). T4 DNA Ligase and buffer; MmeI; and TAE buffer came from New England Biolabs (Ipswich, MA), while HiFi Hotstart Readymix was from KAPA Biosystems (Wilmington, MA) and PCR SuperMix came from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Bacterial Strain and Molecular Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The bacterial strains and oligonucleotides used in this study are listed in Supplementary Tables 4 and5, respectively. oligonucleotides for cloning were ordered from Life Technologies (www.thermofisher.com) and oligonucleotides for next-generation sequencing libraries preparation were ordered from Integrated DNA Technologies (www.IDT.com). We used the GoTaq® Green Master Mix (Promega) for colony PCRs; and Q5 hot start DNA polymerase (New England Biolabs) for all other PCR reactions. DNA fragments were purified with the QIAquick PCR purification or Gel extraction kit (Qiagen). T4 DNA ligase and buffer were purchased from NEB. Plasmid and genomic DNA isolations were carried out with the QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit and the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen), respectively.
The DvH genome annotation used in this study includes protein-coding genes that are not in the current version in GenBank (GCF_000195755.1). These additional genes were identified by transcriptomics and proteomics evidence (Price et al., 2011) , and each starts with the systematic name "DORF". These annotations are included in the DvH information at MicrobesOnline (Dehal et al., 2010) .
The genes neighborhood comparison shown in this study was achieved using the BioCyc Database collection and the Ensembl Bacteria browser (Howe et al., 2020; Karp et al., 2019) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!