The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

17 protocols using uplsapo60x

1

Confinement-based Live Imaging of ICM Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
E3.75 PdgfraH2B-GFP/+ positive embryos obtained from intercrossing of PdgfraH2B-GFP/+ and CD-1 or F1 hybrid were used. Isolated single ICM cells in Blast medium containing 1:10000 CellMask Orange (Life Technologies) were loaded into the BSA coated polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) confinement devices with a fixed roof height of 8 μm, 9 μm or 10 μm. Confinement devices were designed to restrict cells between two glass plates, trapping the cells in the z-direction but allowing free movement in x- and y-direction, as first demonstrated in (Le Berre et al., 2014 (link)). To adapt the device for the use with very small cell numbers, we modified confinement channels as described in Heuzé et al. (2011) (link) by replacing the channels with pillars to create a constant, well-defined roof height. Live imaging of the cells was performed with a 6x silicon objective (UPLSAPO60XS, Olympus) on an inverted microscope (Olympus FV1200) equipped with a humidified chamber at 37°C and 5% CO2. The bright field, GFP, and CellMask images of the cells were taken every one, two or three minutes for up to ten hours.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Dual-Color Imaging of C. elegans Embryos

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryos were dissected from gravid hermaphrodites in M9 buffer. Embryos were mounted in a 1–2 μL droplet of M9 containing a total of 50–100 20 μm diameter polystyrene beads (Polysciences Inc.) on a coverslip. A smaller coverslip was laid on top and sealed with melted Vaseline to prevent evaporation. For dual-color imaging, both channels were simultaneously acquired on a pair of aligned EM-CCD cameras (C9100-13) on a Zeiss AxioObserver Z1 inverted microscope frame with Yokogawa CSU-X1 spinning disk. Image acquisition was performed using MetaMorph software (Molecular Devices). An Olympus UPLSAPO 60xs silicone oil immersion objective was used for all embryonic imaging with an adapter to enable mounting on a Zeiss body (Thorlabs). Errors in alignment between the two cameras were corrected for by periodically imaging a field of multi-color beads, computing an affine alignment (Preibisch et al., 2014 (link)) and applying the transformation to the acquired images using Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012 (link)). To enable higher contrast imaging for protein localization without photobleaching, thinner sections were imaged; typically 11–15 slices in total with 0.75 μm between slices.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Matrix Degradation by Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gelatin was fluorescently labeled with Alexa-405-NHS ester and 35 mm glass bottom dishes (MatTek Corporation) were coated with Alexa-405-gelatin as previously described31 (link). 400,000 (4T1/67NR) or 300,000 (MDA-MB-231) cells were plated per dish and cells were fixed 18 h later with 4% paraformaldehyde (Alfa Aesar) for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 (Calbiochem) for 5 min, blocked with 1% FBS/1% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich) in PBS (Gibco) for 3 h, incubated with anti Tks5 antibody (Millipore, MABT336) for 2 h, then with secondary antibody and Alexa Fluor 633 Phalloidin (Invitrogen) for 1 h.
Samples were imaged on a laser scanning confocal microscope (FV1200, Olympus) using a 60X objective (UPLSAPO60XS, 1.35 NA, Olympus). Stacks were collected at 1 µm z-step. To quantify matrix degradation, images were processed using a custom macro in Fiji. Briefly, slices from the stack were z-projected using the Max Intensity method, followed by thresholding of the signal in the gelatin channel, using the Automatic Threshold algorithm, and measuring the area of degradation spots using the Particle Analysis tool. To account for the differences in the cell density across fields of view, the total area of degradation in a field of view was divided by the total number of cell present in this field of view. Cells were counted using the F-actin staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Live-cell Imaging of Semi-in vivo Fertilization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unless otherwise indicated, all images were generated using an AxioCam HRc mounted on a Zeiss Axioplan 2 imaging microscope with the software AxioVision version 4.8; with an Axio Imager.Z1 equipped with an AxioCamMR3; or with a confocal microscope OLYMPUS BX61Wi with the software OLYMPUS FLUOVIEW version 3.1. Microscopic images were processed using Adobe Photoshop and Illustrator software.
For live-cell imaging of semi-in vivo fertilization, the following microscopy settings were used as described previously (Hamamura et al., 2014 (link); Gooh et al., 2015 (link)). Confocal images were acquired using an inverted microscope IX-83 (Olympus) equipped with a disk-scan confocal system (CSU-W1; Yokogawa Electric). A silicone oil immersion objective lens, UPLSAPO60XS (Olympus), mounted on a Piezo z-drive (P-721; Physik Instrumente) was used. Time-lapse and z-stack images were acquired every 5-10 min in seven planes (3 μm intervals). The exposure time of 488 nm laser was 250-300 ms for eGFP, and of 561 nm laser was 50-200 ms for mRFP and tdTomato. Images were processed by Metamorph version 7.8.4.0 (Universal Imaging) to display maximum-intensity projection images and to add pseudo-colors. The images and movies were edited by MacBiophotonics ImageJ software (http://www.macbiophotonics.ca/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

High-Resolution 3D Imaging of Neuronal Structures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serial optical sections of brains were obtained with a resolution of 512 × 512 pixels using an FV-1000D or FV3000 laser-scanning confocal microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with a silicone-oil immersion lens (30x objective, NA = 1.05, UPLSAPO30XS, 0.83 μm/pixel, 0.93-μm intervals; 60x objective, NA = 1.30, UPLSAPO60XS, 0.26 μm/pixel, 0.55-μm intervals; Olympus, Japan). Confocal datasets were reconstructed using the three-dimensional (3D)-reconstruction software FluoRender (Wan et al., 2009 (link)). For the projection analysis of En+ JO neurons (Figure 8b), signals of cells that were not relevant to the traced neurons were erased manually from the original images utilizing FluoRender for clarity. To overlay the trans-Tango signals from different brain samples (Figure 14b), brain images were digitally aligned to a template brain with non-rigid registration using the Computational Morphometry Toolkit (CMTK; RRID: SCR_002234) (Jefferis et al., 2007). We used the signal of the nc82 antibody, which labels synaptic sites of all the neurons, as a reference. The size and color of the images were adjusted using Photoshop CS5 (Adobe Systems, San Jose, CA; RRID: SCR_014198), FluoRender, and ImageJ (National Institutes of Health; RRID: SCR_003070).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Measuring Cell-ECM Contact Angle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Measurement of the contact angle was performed as previously described36 (link). Briefly, 35 mm glass bottom dishes (MatTek Corporation) were coated with fluorescently labeled gelatin as previously described31 (link) or with 50 µg/ml poly-L-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich) for 20 min and let to air dry. Cells were left to adhere for 5 h before imaging. Solitary cells, which had no physical interaction with nearby cells, were imaged on a laser scanning confocal microscope (FV1200, Olympus) using a 60X objective (UPLSAPO60XS, 1.35 NA, Olympus) equipped with an environmental chamber (In Vivo Scientific), with a 1 µm z-step. Orthogonal Views was used to measure the angle between the ECM and the main body of the cell: the contact angle.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

4D Imaging of C. elegans Embryogenesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryos were collected from gravid hermaphrodites and mounted with polystyrene beads (Polysciences Inc) as described (Du et al., 2015 (link)). Embryos were imaged on a Zeiss AxioObserver Z1 inverted microscope frame with Yokogawa CSU-X1 spinning disk and an Olympus UPLSAPO 60xs silicone oil immersion objective. GFP and mCherry channels were acquired simultaneously on a pair of aligned EMCCD cameras (C9100-13). Image acquisition was performed using MetaMorph software (Molecular Devices). Embryos were imaged every 75 s, with 30 z slices at 1 μm apart. Lineage tracing and quantification of marker expression were done with the StarryNite and AceTree software as described (Du et al., 2015 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Contact Angle Measurement of Cell-ECM Interaction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Measurement of the contact angle was performed as previously described (36) . Brie y, 35 mm glass bottom dishes (MatTek Corporation) were coated with uorescently labeled gelatin as previously described (31) or with 50 µg/ml poly-L-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich) for 20 min and let to air dry. Cells were left to adhere for 5 h before imaging. Solitary cells, which had no physical interaction with nearby cells, were imaged on a laser scanning confocal microscope (FV1200, Olympus) using a 60X objective (UPLSAPO60XS, 1.35 NA, Olympus) equipped with an environmental chamber (In Vivo Scienti c), with a 1 µm z-step. Orthogonal Views was used to measure the angle between the ECM and the main body of the cell: the contact angle.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Fingerprint hsSRS Imaging Setup

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experimental setup we used for fingerprint hsSRS imaging was published previously24 (link) (supplementary Fig. S1). In brief, two synchronized femtosecond lasers were chirped to about 2 ps using SF57 glass rods. One laser was fixed at 1040 nm wavelength and the other was tunable from 750 nm to 970 nm. We chose the center wavelength of the tunable laser to be at 914 nm and 890 nm for hsSRS imaging in the 1300 cm−1 region and 1600 cm−1 region, respectively. The wavenumbers were calibrated with oleic acid spectral peaks using linear fitting. Spectral resolution is about 20–30 cm−1. The temporal delay between the two pulsed lasers was controlled by a motorized stage (Newport MFA-PP). A 60X water immersion objective (Olympus UPLSAPO60X, NA = 1.2) was used to focus the lasers onto the sample, with typical optical power at the sample of 40 mW for the pump beam and 40 mW for the Stokes beam. Each SRS image has 512 × 512 pixels and takes 1.65 sec to acquire.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fingerprint hsSRS Imaging Setup

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experimental setup we used for fingerprint hsSRS imaging was published previously24 (link) (supplementary Fig. S1). In brief, two synchronized femtosecond lasers were chirped to about 2 ps using SF57 glass rods. One laser was fixed at 1040 nm wavelength and the other was tunable from 750 nm to 970 nm. We chose the center wavelength of the tunable laser to be at 914 nm and 890 nm for hsSRS imaging in the 1300 cm−1 region and 1600 cm−1 region, respectively. The wavenumbers were calibrated with oleic acid spectral peaks using linear fitting. Spectral resolution is about 20–30 cm−1. The temporal delay between the two pulsed lasers was controlled by a motorized stage (Newport MFA-PP). A 60X water immersion objective (Olympus UPLSAPO60X, NA = 1.2) was used to focus the lasers onto the sample, with typical optical power at the sample of 40 mW for the pump beam and 40 mW for the Stokes beam. Each SRS image has 512 × 512 pixels and takes 1.65 sec to acquire.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!