The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Stata ic version 15

Manufactured by StataCorp
Sourced in United States

Stata/IC version 15.1 is a statistical software package developed by StataCorp. It provides a comprehensive set of tools for data analysis, management, and visualization. Stata/IC version 15.1 offers a wide range of statistical methods and functionalities to assist users in their research and analytical endeavors.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

93 protocols using stata ic version 15

1

Bivariate Analysis of Farmer Generations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess differences between first- and multi-generation farmers, we conducted bivariate analysis in STATA IC (version 15) (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, USA). We selected the bivariate over the multivariate analysis approach because regression models using children safety measures as dependent variables and the farming background variable as the independent variable controlling for demographic and farm characteristics from Table 1 failed basic model quality checks including not having at least five observations per cell in the crosstabs, the model p value was above the 0.05 threshold, or Hosmer–Lemeshow test indicated a poor model fit. While multivariate analysis is preferable, bivariate analysis is appropriate for exploratory studies such as ours.
We used Chi-square and ANOVA tests to assess statistically significant differences and the p-value threshold of ≤0.05 as the statistical significance threshold.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Extubation Success Prediction Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive analysis was performed on the demographic data. Continuous data were presented as mean and standard deviation (mean ± SD), and categorical variables were presented as counts and percentages. For continuous variables, comparisons between the control and intervention groups were performed using unequal variances t test (Welch’s t test). Comparisons between categorical variables were performed using Chi-squared test for proportions.
Sensitivity and specificity were calculated using the Δtdi% in relation to the success of extubation within 24 h and 48 h. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed, and the area under the curve and the cutoff for the change in tdi were determined. The cutoff for the change in tdi was chosen based on a sensitivity and specificity of approximately 80%. A 2-tailed p value of < 0.05 was considered significant. All statistical analyses were performed using Stata/IC version 15 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Analyzing Opioid Use Recovery Patterns

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive statistics were calculated for the quantitative variables of interest. Bivariate associations were assessed using Pearson product-moment correlations for continuous-continuous associations, point-biserial correlations for binary-continuous associations, and phi coefficients for binary-binary associations. Independent samples t-tests were used to compare likelihood of resuming opioid use in the future. Significance was set at α = .05. All analyses were conducted with IBM SPSS version 24 and StataIC version 15 [12 ,45 ].We analyzed the focus group interviews using an inductive, thematic analysis. Focus group transcripts were read in their entirety and discussed by two researchers (JG, MD) to grasp overall themes in the data immediately following each focus group. We used these initial discussions to formulate a list of salient codes to apply across transcripts. After all of the focus groups were conducted and transcribed, we began line-by-line descriptive coding. During this process, codes were eliminated, added, and modified based on the content of the focus groups. Emergent themes were compared across individuals, within groups, and across focus groups. MAXQDA 12 software facilitated coding and data analysis procedures [29 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analyzing Adverse Drug Reactions in CRC Screening

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Comparative statistics were performed using Student’s t test and Pearson’s Chi-squared analysis. Separate analyses of ADRs by gender, indication and age were performed to control for different patient populations. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to control for patient-level confounders (gender, age, 1st degree relative with CRC, 1st colonoscopy, trainee involvement, caecal or TI intubation). Associations were quantified by odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A significant P-value was defined as < 0.05. All analyses were conducted using Stata IC Version 15.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Continuous and Categorical Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was conducted using STATA/IC version 15. Descriptive statistics were expressed as medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) for continuous variables and as percentages for categorical variables. Comparisons of categorical data were performed with chi-squared test and Fisher's exact test, while continuous data were analyzed with nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test. A p value ≤ 0.01 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Pediatric Asthma Risk Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analyses were conducted using STATA IC Version 15 (Stata, College Station, TX, USA). Chi-square tests were used to test for associations between categorical variables. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between potential risk factors and binary outcome variables (physician-diagnosed asthma or the presence of respiratory symptoms). We examined the associations in unadjusted models and stepwise adjustment for a priori selected covariates (minimally adjusted model: age and sex, language of survey response) and fully-adjusted final models (adjusted for age, sex, language of survey response, education level of the parent/caregiver survey respondent, school of enrollment). Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
Children were classified as asthmatic if the child’s parent answered affirmatively to the question “Has your child ever received an official doctor’s diagnosis for asthma?” A child was considered to have bronchitic symptoms if the child’s parent reported at least one of the following: 1) daily cough for three months in a row, 2) congestion or phlegm for at least three months in a row, or 3) bronchitis in the past year [20 (link)]. Health insurance was categorized into public, private, or none. Respiratory medications were categorized as rescue, control, or other [21 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Modeling Disease Progression in SC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Disease progression during SC was modeled using data from the natural history study of patient visits in which VA and VF were recorded. A parametric multistate survival model was estimated on the basis of observed health state transitions to derive the annual transition probability of disease progression for patients who received SC (eTable 4 in the Supplement provides details).20 (link) By construct, the multistate survival model allows progression from less to more severe health states but restricts patients from regressing to less visually impaired states, consistent with disease progression. Estimations were conducted using the msset and predictms commands in Stata, IC version 15 (StataCorp).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Questionnaire Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
STATA IC version 15 was used to perform all the statistical analyses. The level of significance was set at 5%. Correlation coefficients were considered to be strong if r ≥ 0.70, moderate for 0.50 ≤ r < 0.70 and weak if r < 0.50 (15) . Missing data were managed in accordance with the scoring descriptions for the respective questionnaires (18). We explored the extent of missing answers and floor and ceiling effect to determine whether particular items in the BRAF-MDQ indicated problems in understanding the content (31) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analyses for Scientific Exploration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses (mean, min, max, standard deviation) were performed with Stata IC version 15 (Stata Corporation, Texas, Usa) and Microsoft Office Excel 2007.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Examining Factors Influencing Debt and Quality of Life

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We calculated measures of central tendency for continuous variables and proportions for ordinal and nominal variables. We reported on the overall response rate to the survey and evaluated the distribution of the study variables. Total debt was not normally distributed and was log-transformed to meet the assumptions required to conduct linear regression. We conducted separate univariate linear regression analyses to determine variables associated with our outcomes: log-transformed total debt and quality of life. In the following step, we conducted multivariable linear regression to find variables independently associated with the outcomes. For all other questions, analyses were two-tailed, a p-value < 0.05 was considered significant, and analyses were conducted with Stata I/C version 15, Stata Corp LLC, College Station, TX, USA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!