The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

187 protocols using cd206

1

Immunohistochemical and Immunofluorescence Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin sections were dewaxed, rehydrated, and repaired with an antigen repair solution. IHC analysis was performed by following the kit instructions (Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology, Beijing, China). Primary antibodies for IHC included ki67 (Proteintech, 28074-1-AP), p65 (CST, 8242), CXCL2 (Bioss, bs-1162R), CD86 (Abcam, ab220188) and CD206 (Abcam, ab64693).
After antigen repair, the IF staining steps of tissue sections were similar to the cell IF above. The applied primary antibodies were p65 (CST, 8242), CD86 (Abcam, ab220188), and CD206 (Abcam, ab64693).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemistry Assay of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry experiments were performed according to our previous article [27 (link)]. The following antibodies were used to assay: E-cadherin (Abways, CY1155, 1:200), N-cadherin (Abways, CY5015, 1:200), Vimentin (Abways, CY1155, 1:200), IL-6 (Absin, abs135607, 1:200), CD206(Abcam, ab64693, 1:200).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Inflammatory Cytokine Regulation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lipopolysaccharide was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St Louis, Ca). Recombinant mouse IL-4, recombinant mouse IL-6, recombinant mouse IL-1β, recombinant mouse TNF-α, recombinant mouse IL-10, and recombinant mouse TGF-β were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Tocilizumab, LY2109761, R-7050, Stattic, Bay 11-7082, and SIS3HCl were purchased from Selleck (Huston, USA). IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL1Ra) was purchased from Make Research Easy (Nanjing, China). Monoclonal mouse anti-β-actin (TA-09) was purchased from Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology (Beijing, China). Antibodies against OT, OTR, β-tubulin, CD206, F4-80, phospho-STAT3, STAT3, phospho-SMAD2, SMAD2, phospho-SMAD3, SMAD3, p65, and phospho-p65 were purchased from Abcam (Cambridge, UK) and Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA). Secondary antibodies were purchased from Invitrogen Life Technology (Foster City, CA). Mouse ELISA kits were obtained from R&D Systems and CUSABIO (Wuhan, China). All reagents were analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Liver Macrophage Phenotyping by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liver single-cell suspensions were harvested and washed twice with precooled PBS. The cell precipitate was then resuspended in binding buffer, and the cells were stained with annexin V and PI (cat. no. A026; GeneCopoeia Inc.) or fluorochrome-labeled CD204 (cat. no. ab123946; 1 : 50; Abcam Inc.), CD206 (cat. no. ab125028; 1 :50; Abcam Inc.), F4/80 (cat. no. ab6640; 1 : 50; Abcam Inc.), CD68 (cat. no. ab201340; 1 : 50; Abcam Inc.), MHC-II (cat. no. ab23990; 1 : 50; Abcam Inc.), and CD11c (cat. no. ab11029; 1 : 50; Abcam Inc.) followed by lucifugal incubation in the dark for 15 min at 37°C. Flow cytometric data were acquired using FACSCalibur and analyzed using the CellQuest version 5.1 software (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Macrophage Phenotypes in Dental Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specimens were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde and decalcified (EDTA, Servicebio, China) for 5–6 weeks at room temperature, then dehydrated. Histological sections were cut buccolingually for HE (Servicebio, China), Masson trichrome (Servicebio, China) and immunohistochemistry staining. Antibodies against inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS, Servicebio, China), CD163 (Servicebio, China), CD206 (Abcam, USA), TNF-α (Servicebio, China), and IL-10 (Servicebio, China) were used in the present experiment.
Sections were scanned using Pannoramic MIDI (3DHISTECH Ltd., Budapest, Hungary) and were browsed with CaseViewer software (3DHISTECH Ltd., Budapest, Hungary). For sections of every sample, pictures of certain area were captured by CaseViewer and were used for analysis. The number of iNOS+, CD163+, and CD206+ cells were counted manually in the fixed size region whose location was selected randomly in the captured field (ImageJ). For IL-10 and TNF-α staining, the positively stained area in the field was identified and quantified using preset constant value of color threshold (ImageJ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Macrophage Polarization Post-Spinal Cord Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At 24 h (n = 4 gp91ds-tat, 4 scrambled ds-tat), 7 days (n = 6 gp91ds-tat, 5 scrambled ds-tat), and 28 days (n = 3 gp91ds-tat, 3 scrambled ds-tat) post-injury or after no intervention (naïve, n = 8), mice were euthanized and tissue was flushed with 100 ml of 0.9 % sodium chloride. A 5-mm spinal cord segment, 2.5 mm rostral and 2.5 mm caudal to the lesion epicenter, was collected and protein extracted with RIPA (1×) buffer (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL). Aliquots of 25 μg were used for western analysis using the following primary antibodies: CD86 (Abcam, 1:250), CD206 (Abcam, 1:500), iNOS (Cell Signaling Technology, 1:200), and phospho-p47PHOX (p-p47; Sigma, 1:250). Immune complexes were detected with appropriate secondary antibodies and chemiluminescence reagents (Pierce, Rockford, IL). GAPDH was used as a control for gel loading and protein transfer. ImageJ software was used to quantify bands.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Lung Immune Cell Profiling in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse lungs were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin. Sections (5 μm) were stained for H&E and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Antibodies against F4/80 (1: 250; Cell Signaling Technology) and CD206 (1:100; Abcam) were used for IHC analysis. For analysis of BALF, cells were stained for eosinophils, macrophages, neutrophils, and lymphocytes using flow cytometry. Eosinophils were defined as SSChigh SiglecF+ Mac-3 cells, alveolar macrophages were identified as SSChigh SiglecF+ Mac-3+ cells, granulocytes were recognized as SSChigh Gr-1+ cells, and lymphocytes were identified as FSClow/SSClow cells expressing CD3 or CD19.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Macrophage Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Alveolar macrophages were washed with PBS and lysed with 1X RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Scientific). Fifty micrograms of protein lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE. Membranes were incubated with antibodies against FIZZ1 (Abcam), Arg (BD Biosciences) and CD206 (Abcam) antibodies. Signals were developed with Pierce ECL Western blot detection kit (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Macrophage polarization assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw 264.7 macrophages cultured in either Pr111 complete media or control media for 24 h were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min, permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 in PBS for 10 min, 0.1% SDS in PBS for 1 min, and blocked in 10% goat serum for 1 h at room temperature. F4/80 antibody (1:200, Invitrogen) was used to label all macrophages. Both iNOS (1:250, Abcam) and CD38 (1:200, Novus Biologicals) were used to label M1 macrophages. Both Ym1 (1:200, Stemcell Technologies) and CD206 (1:1000, Abcam) were used to label M2 macrophages. After 3 washes with PBS containing 0.05% Tween-20, samples were incubated with appropriate Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies and DAPI. After 3 washes with PBST, images were captured using a Zeiss Axiovert 200 M inverted fluorescent microscope with a 10× or 20× objective lens.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Neuroinflammation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry was performed according to the protocol previously described 22 (link). Briefly, the brain tissue was removed from the anti-freezing solution, and the immunohistochemistry procedures were followed. The primary antibodies used were those targeting arginase (ARG; 1:50; Santa Cruz, CA), CD206 (1:200; Abcam, Cambridge, MA), Iba-1 (1:200 dilution, WAKO, Osaka, Japan), mitogen-activated protein 2 (MAP2; 1:200, 1:100; Millipore, Billerica, MA) and NeuN (1:200, Millipore). TdT-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) and NeuN double staining was performed following the manufacturer's instructions on double immunostaining (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). We performed statistical analysis of the immunohistochemistry data by counting the number of CD206 and IBA1, ARG and IBA1, CD16/32 and IBA1, TUNEL and DAPI double-positive cells and GFAP positive cells in 5 regions in the striatum of peri-infarct area of each brain slice, with 2 brain sections (600 μm apart) in each mouse, 4 mice per group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!