The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Qubit fluorometric quantitation

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Canada, Germany, United Kingdom

The Qubit Fluorometric Quantitation is a lab equipment product that provides precise and accurate quantitation of DNA, RNA, and protein samples. It utilizes fluorescent dyes that specifically bind to the target molecules, allowing for sensitive and selective measurement of sample concentrations.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

176 protocols using qubit fluorometric quantitation

1

Streptophenazine Production and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
S. coelicolor M1146-pKDB01 and -pKDB03 were grown following the methods for production of streptophenazines. After 24 h growth in production media, 1 mL of culture was sampled, pelleted and washed with RNase free water. RNA was extracted using Ambion’s PureLink RNA extraction kit following methods for bacterial cells. Briefly, cells were lysed and homogenized using a 20G needle attached to an RNase-free syringe. RNA was bound to a spin column, washed, and eluted with RNase-free water. Concentrations were analyzed using Invitrogen Qubit Fluorometric Quantitation. For primers see Table S6.
RT-PCR was performed using Qiagen’s OneStep RT-PCR kit as follows:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

DRG RNA Extraction for Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bilateral L4 DRG from SNL and sham groups were harvested six days after surgery, immediately treated in RNAlater (Ambion, Austin, TX) and subjected to total RNA extraction. To obtain enough RNA for sequencing, eight L4 DRGs from four mice were pooled together and each group required three biological replicates (n = 12 mice/group). For quantitative real-time PCR assay, four L4 DRGs from the ipsilateral sides of four SNL or sham mice were pooled together and the experiment was repeated three times (n = 12 mice/group). Briefly, total RNA was extracted using the miRNeasy kit with on-column digestion of genomic DNA (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentration was measured using the NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE) and Qubit Fluorometric Quantitation (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Ratios of A260/280 nm were between 1.97 and 2.08. RNA integrity was assessed using RNA Nano chips in an Agilent 2100 Bionalyzer (Agilent technologies, Santa Clara, CA). RNA integrity numbers (RIN) were between 7.5 and 8.4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiplexed Barcode Sequencing for Lineage Tracing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The BFG‐GI technology relies on the Cre/Lox system to recombine the complementary donor and recipient loxP/lox2272 sites that serve to introduce the donor barcode adjacent to the recipient barcode (Fig 1). We multiplex‐sequenced the fused barcodes from pools of cells using the following steps: (i) genomic DNA extraction using glass beads and phenol/chloroform; (ii) PCR amplification of the 325‐bp barcode fusion product including the two 20‐bp barcodes and the multiplexing sequencing adapters (one index for each condition, for each technical replicate); (iii) concentration and gel purification of amplicons using 2% E‐Gel EX agarose 2% (Invitrogen), DNA Clean & Concentrator Kit (Zymo Research), and MinElute Gel Extraction Kit 50 (Qiagen); (iv) normalization of DNA libraries using Qubit Fluorometric Quantitation (Invitrogen); (v) mix of libraries at equal concentrations; (vi) quantification of the pooled DNA library mix by qPCR; and (vii) sequencing by Illumina 75‐cycle NextSeq paired‐end technology, including 25 cycles for each barcode and 6 cycles for the multiplex index. We mapped sequencing *.fastq files against the library of expected barcode sequences using the program Segemehl (v0.1.7, ‐A 85) and custom scripts; 97% of all sequencing reads mapped to expected barcodes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNA Extraction from Cultured DRG Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cultured DRG neurons were harvested, immediately treated in RNAlater (Ambion, Austin, TX) and stored in the freezer. Total RNA was extracted using the miRNeasy kit with on-column digestion of genomic DNA (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentration was measured using the NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE) and Qubit Fluorometric Quantitation (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Ratios of A260/280 nm were between 1.97 and 2.08.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Stool DNA Extraction Kit Comparison

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to DNA extraction, the aliquots were homogenised a second time, to avoid variability caused by changes in the microenvironments after 48 hours of storage. For the first five samples, three different commercially available stool DNA extraction kits were compared: PSP® Spin Stool DNA Kit (Stratec Biomedical, Germany), ZymoBIOMICS DNA Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research, USA) and QIAamp PowerFecal DNA Isolation Kit (Qiagen, formerly moBio, Germany). The workflow is shown in Fig 1. Briefly, for each kit, DNA was extracted from 200 mg aliquots of stool from each of the four storage conditions, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Aliquots frozen at -80°C were not thawed prior to extraction. DNA purity (A260/A280 and A260/A230), and yield (ng/μL) were determined using the BioDrop μLite spectrophotometer (BioDrop, UK) and by Qubit Fluorometric Quantitation (Invitrogen, USA) at the Central Analytical Facility (CAF) of Stellenbosch University. We used the Kruskal-Wallis test [13 ] for non-normally distributed data to determine whether the different extraction kits or storage methods influenced the DNA yield significantly (p < 0.05). DNA degradation was assessed by gel electrophoresis. The remaining five samples were subjected to the same storage condition comparisons as described above and DNA was extracted with the kit that showed the best performance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DNA Sequencing Library Preparation Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was quantified (Qubit Fluorometric Quantitation, Invitrogen, Life Technologies) and sheared into fragments of 400–600 bp. Illumina libraries were generated using a) the PCR free protocol (NoPCR) [15 (link)] or b) the standard library preparation using the KAPA enzyme [16 (link)] with eight PCR cycles. NoPCR libraries were sequenced on the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform for 100 paired-end cycles and standard PCR libraries were sequenced on Illumina MiSeq for 150 paired ends cycles using V4 or V5 SBS sequencing kits and proprietary reagents according to manufacturer's recommended protocol (https://icom.illumina.com/). Data were analysed from the Illumina sequencing machines using RTA1.6, RTA1.8 or GA v0.3 analysis pipelines.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Endophytic and Rhizosphere DNA Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total endophytic community DNA was extracted from surface disinfected root samples using the PowerPlant®Pro DNA Isolation Kit (MoBio Laboratories Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) and the rhizosphere soil community DNA was extracted using the MoBio PowerSoil® extraction kit (MoBio Laboratories Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA). DNA exactions were conducted following the manufacture’s protocols. The DNA yield was quantified using Qubit®Fluorometric Quantitation (Invitrogen) and in a SYBR Safe (Invitrogen) 1% agarose gel by comparison with a high DNA mass ladder (Invitrogen) using a Bio-Rad Gel Doc XR System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Mississauga, ON, Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

DNA Extraction and PCR Amplification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was extracted from the fin clips with the DNeasy 96 Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. PCR was carried out using Colorless GoTaq Flexi Reaction Buffer (Promega) with PCR dnd primers19 (link). The PCR product was purified with QIAquick PCR purification Kit (Qiagen) and measured via Qubit Fluorometric Quantitation (Invitrogen). Purified and quantified PCR products were cloned into PCR4-TOPO using the TOPO TA cloning kit for sequencing (Invitrogen). Cloned fragments were sequenced with M13 forward and reversed primers using BigDye 3.1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genomic DNA Extraction and Sequencing of Drosophila mauritiana

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We sequenced wMau-infected R9,
R29, and R60 D. mauritiana genotypes.
Tissue samples for genomic DNA were extracted using a modified CTAB Genomic DNA
Extraction protocol. DNA quantity was tested on an Implen Nanodrop (Implen,
München, Germany) and total DNA was quantified by Qubit Fluorometric
Quantitation (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA). DNA was cleaned using
Agencourt AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Brea, CA, U.S.A), following
manufacturers’ instructions, and eluted in 50 μl 1× TE
Buffer for shearing. DNA was sheared using a Covaris E220 Focused Ultrasonicator
(Covaris Inc., Woburn, MA) to a target size of 400 bp. We prepared libraries
using NEBNext® Ultra™ II DNA Library Prep with Sample Purification
Beads (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, Massachusetts). Final fragment sizes and
concentrations were confirmed using a TapeStation 2200 system (Agilent, Santa
Clara, California). We indexed samples using NEBNext® Multiplex Oligos
for Illumina® (Index Primers Set 3 & Index Primers Set 4), and 10
μl of each sample was shipped to Novogene (Sacramento, CA) for sequencing
using Illumina HiSeq 4000 (San Diego, CA), generating paired-end, 150 bp
reads.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

16S Amplicon Sequencing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
16S Metagenomic Sequencing kit (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for library preparation. V3–V4 hypervariable regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene were amplified using the primers (5′-CCTACGGGNGGCWGCAG-3′ and 5′ GACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′) provided by the manufacturer and following the recommended protocol as described before (29 (link)). Library concentration was assessed by Qubit Fluorometric Quantitation (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA). Short-read paired-end amplicon sequencing was performed using Illumina® MiSeq Instrument for 600 cycles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!