The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

29 protocols using micafungin

1

Micafungin Dosing and Activity Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Micafungin (Astellas Pharma US, Inc., Deerfield, IL, USA) was provided as a sterile powder and was reconstituted and diluted further in sterile 0.9% normal saline to achieve the required concentrations of 1 mg/mL or 10 mg/mL.
The dosage of systemically administered Micafungin was based upon prior laboratory investigations and preliminary data for these experiments [29 (link),30 (link),31 (link),32 (link)]. The concentrations for lock therapy were derived from previous in vitro studies conducted in our laboratory [17 (link),18 (link)].
The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of Micafungin were determined by standard methods of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) using broth microdilution [37 ] and were defined as the lowest concentration that caused an optically clear well. The MICs of Micafungin against C. albicans and C. parapsilosis were 0.125 μg/mL and 0.125 μg/mL, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Preparation and Evaluation of Antifungal Agents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nagilactone E was from laboratory stock [13] . AmB was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Polyethylene glycol tert-octylphenyl ether (Triton X-100) was obtained from Alfa Aesar (Lancashire, UK). Micafungin (MCFG) was a gift from Astellas Pharma Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). The drugs were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) prior to the following experiments. All other chemicals used were of analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Echinocandin Antifungal Activity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The echinocandins used in this study were generous gifts from Pfizer, New York, NY, USA (anidulafungin), Merck Sharp and Dohme, Kenilworth, NJ, USA (caspofungin), and Astellas Pharma, Chūō, Tokyo, Japan (micafungin). The echinocandins were kept at −20 °C in stock solution (10 mg/mL in DMSO) and assayed at the final concentrations specified in the text, tables, and figures. For micro-culture assays of a large number of samples, log-phase cultures grown in YES medium were diluted to a cell density of 5 × 105 cells/mL (lower cell density) or 5 × 106 cells/mL (higher cell density) in YES medium containing increasing concentrations of echinocandins (1, 2, 4, 10, 20, 40, and 80 µg/mL) or an equal volume of solvent (0.8% DMSO), which was the control cell culture. The cell cultures were grown in an orbital roller at 28 °C, and turbidity was examined after 24 h of growth. The MIC was the minimal concentration of echinocandin that induced a complete inhibition of the cell growth after 24 h of growth. The values were calculated from at least three independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of C. glabrata

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) followed the CLSI-M60 (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2017 ) protocol and included fluconazole (Pfizer, New York, NY, USA), amphotericin B (AMB) (Sigma-Aldrich, Milwaukee, WI, USA), micafungin (Astellas Pharma, Tokyo, Japan), and anidulafungin (Pfizer). Plates containing antifungal drug-C. glabrata cell suspensions were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h and minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were visually recorded. Type strains of C. krusei (ATCC 6258) and C. parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) were used in each individual AFST experiment for quality control purposes. Susceptibility profiles were denoted based on the availability of the clinical breakpoints and epidemiological cut-off values (ECVs) as suggested (Pfaller & Diekema 2012 (link)). Briefly, isolates showing MIC ≥ 64 μg/ml, ≥ 0.5 μg/ml, and ≥ 0.25 μg/ml were regarded as fluconazole-resistant, anidulafungin-resistant, and micafungin-resistant, respectively (Pfaller & Diekema 2012 (link)). The MIC data of AMB was interpreted based on ECVs and isolates showing a MIC > 2μg/ml were regarded as non-wild-type (Pfaller & Diekema 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Candida

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antifungal susceptibility tests were performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) protocol M27ED4(18 ) using the broth microdilution technique against the antifungal agents fluconazole, amphotericin B (SIGMA Pharma, USA), and micafungin (Astellas Pharma). Antifungal dilutions were performed with RPMI 1640 medium to obtain final concentrations ranging from 0.03-16μg/mL for amphotericin B and micafungin and from 0.125-64μg/mL for fluconazole.
The reading criteria included the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), which is the lowest concentration capable of visually inhibiting 50% of the growth of Candida spp. after treatment with fluconazole and micafungin and 100% after treatment with amphotericin B. Susceptibility test readings were performed 24 hours after incubation and interpreted following the CLSI document M6028(19 ) to determine the clinical breakpoints. According to this document, there is no defined breakpoint for amphotericin B. Therefore, the clinical breakpoint used in this study was described by Nguyen et al.(20 (link))
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of N. glabrata

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Broth microdilution was used to perform in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing in accordance with the protocols outlined in Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M27‐A4 and M60 guidelines [27 , 28 ]. The in vitro activity of nine antifungal drugs, including itraconazole (Janssen Pharmaceutical, Beers, Belgium), anidulafungin, fluconazole, isavuconazole, posaconazole, voriconazole (Pfizer), amphotericin B (Bristol‐Myers‐Squib, Quebec, Canada), caspofungin (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), and micafungin (Astellas Pharma Inc., Tokyo, Japan), against N. glabrata isolates was assessed.
The wells contained antifungal drugs at final concentrations ranging from 0.016 to 16 μg/mL for voriconazole, itraconazole, amphotericin B, isavuconazole, and posaconazole, 0.064–64 μg/mL for fluconazole, and 0.008–8 μg/mL for anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin.
To ensure quality control and reproducibility of the testing methods, American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) control strains (C. krusei ATCC 6258 and C. parapsilosis ATCC 22019) were included. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were interpreted on the basis of the proposed CLSI M27‐A4 and CLSI M60 breakpoints [27 , 28 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antifungal Susceptibility Testing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antifungal susceptibility testing was performed according the EUCAST method [14 (link)]. The following ranges of antifungals were tested: Amphotericin B (0.03–16 mg/L) (Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain), 5-flucytosine (0.25–64 mg/L) (Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain), fluconazole (0.25–64 mg/L) (Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA), isavuconazole (0.015–8 mg/L) (Basilea Pharmaceutica, Basel, Switzerland), itraconazole (0.015–8 mg/L) (Janssen Pharmaceutical, Madrid, Spain), posaconazole (0.015–8 mg/L) (Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA), voriconazole (0.015–8 mg/L) (Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA), anidulafungin (0.008–4 mg/L) (Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA), caspofungin (0.03–16 mg/L) (Merck &Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA), and micafungin (0.004–2 mg/L) (Astellas Pharma, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Candida krusei ATCC 6258 and Candida parapsilosis ATCC 22019 were used as quality control strains in all tests performed. The optical densities were read after 24 h. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MIC) were defined as the lowest concentration that inhibited 90% (Amphotericin B) and 50% (other antifungals) of growth. MIC values were interpreted according to EUCAST breakpoints(https://eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Aspergillus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metabolic analysis -The susceptibility test was conducted by microdilution method. Aspergillus (2 × 10 4 conidia/ml)was incubated at 37℃ in an antifungal dilution series for 24h with micafungin (Astellas Pharma Inc., Osaka, Japan)or for 48h with amphotericin B(Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC., St. Louis, USA)or voriconazole(Sigma-Aldrich Co. LLC.) . CellTiter-Blue(Promega Co., Madison, USA) was then added according to the manufacturerʼs protocol, and Abs600 was measured in the supernatant.
Microscopy -The morphological changes caused by antifungals were observed in each well using a microscope(20 × magnification) .
Inhibition ratio -The inhibition ratio was calculated using the following formula:
Inhibition ratio =(Abs600, sample / Abs600, control)× 100 Each experiment was performed in duplicate and repeated at least three times.
IC50 -The antifungal concentration causing 50% inhibition of growth was determined as the IC50 from the inhibition ratio graph.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Antifungal Susceptibility of C. africana Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All C. africana isolates obtained herein were tested for in vitro susceptibility to amphotericin B, flucytosine, fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and posaconazole (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), caspofungin (Merck & Co., Inc.), and micafungin (Astellas Pharma) by using broth microdilution method as described in CLSI document M27-A3 and M27-S4. The MIC values were read following 24 h of incubation and determined visually as the lowest concentration in which prominent decrease in turbidity was observed excepting for amphotericin B which is defined as the lowest concentration in which the absence of turbidity is observed. The recently revised CLSI clinical breakpoints (CBPs) values for C. albicans were used as reference [28 (link)]. Quality control was performed as recommended in CLSI documents using C. parapsilosis ATCC22019 and C. krusei ATCC 6258.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Broth Microdilution for Antifungal AFST

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The broth microdilution protocol of the CLSI M27-A3 was followed. AFST included the following antifungal drugs, fluconazole (Pfizer), amphotericin B (Sigma-Aldrich), micafungin (Astellas Pharma), and anidulafungin (Pfizer). Plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and the MIC50 data (50% growth reduction compared to controls without drug) were determined visually. Each experiment included at least three biological replicates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!