The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

28 protocols using may gr nwald

1

Capturing Cancer Cell Morphology Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ScreenCell® filter morphology was assessed using May–Grünwald Giemsa staining. Filters were placed into a bath containing May–Grünwald (Sigma Aldrich Ltd., Dublin, Ireland) and incubated for 2 min 30 s with constant agitation, followed by a second incubation in a 1:1 dilution of May-Grünwald:dH2O (pH 7) for a further 2 min with agitation. Filters were subsequently incubated in a stain consisting of a 1:10 dilution of Giemsa:dH2O (pH 7) for 10 min. Excess stain was removed by washing in dH2O (pH 7) for 1 min, and filters were allowed to air dry at room temperature for 20 min. Morphological assessment of stained filters was carried out using an Olympus BX41 light microscope (Olympus Life Science, Waltham, MA, USA). CTCs that were identified, based on morphology, were enumerated and recorded by an independent expert cytopathologist (B.H.). CTCs were defined as cells in the same plane of focus as filter pores whose nucleus was at least twice the diameter of a filter pore, dark blue/purple in colour and with an outline that was well-defined around its entire circumference. These criteria have been used for the morphological identification of CTCs in recently published studies of prostate cancer patients [27 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microscopic Analysis of Leukemia Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
sgRNA-expressing leukemia cells were harvested from the bone marrow of recipient mice 13 days post transplantation. GFP+ cells (coexpressed with sgRNA) were sorted by FACS and were subjected to cytospin preparation onto glass slides. The samples were stained with May-Grünwald (Merck) and Giemsa (Merck) for microscopic imaging using Nikon Eclipse 50i microscope at 100x magnification with oil immersion. The images were acquired using Leica DFC320 camera and Leica IM500 acquisition software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Bronchoalveolar Lavage Cell Counting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the other set of mice, bronchoalveolar lavage was performed as previously described by our group [16 (link)]. Briefly, lungs were washed three times with 0.7 mL of sterile saline. Total cells were counted using an automated cell counter (LUNA-II, Logos Biosystems, France) and the BAL fluid was centrifuged at 1000× g for 10 min. The supernatant was stored at −80 °C until further analyses and the pellet was resuspended in PBS for differential cell counts. A volume of 100 µL of resuspended cells adjusted to 0.75 × 106 cells/mL were spun at 450 rpm for 6 min (Cytospin™4 cytocentrifuge, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) onto microscope slides. Slides were air-dried, fixed in methanol for 10 min and stained with May–Grünwald (Química Clínica Aplicada S.A, Tarragona, Spain) for 5 min and 30% Giemsa (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 15 min. Counts of macrophages, neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils and lymphocytes were carried out in a total of 400 cells from each sample in a blinded manner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Bronchoalveolar Lavage Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were deeply anaesthetized via i.p. injection of 120 mg/kg ketamine (Bremer Pharma GmbH, Warburg, Germany) and 16 mg/kg xylazine (cp-pharma, Burgdorf, Germany), tracheostomized and euthanized by exsanguination. Lung lavage was performed by careful injection and aspiration of 0.0175 mL/g body weight PBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) three times using a 1 mL syringe. BAL samples were centrifuged and the cell-free supernatant was used for zymography and cytokine measurements. BAL total cell counts were determined and 3 × 104 cells were adhered on a glass slide using a cytospin. Slides were stained with May-Grünwald (1:1) and Giemsa (1:10) solutions (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for differential cell counts. At least 400 cells were counted to obtain cell type percentages to calculate total numbers per BAL volume (cells/mL) for each cell type.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Microscopic Analysis of Leukemia Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
sgRNA-expressing leukemia cells were harvested from the bone marrow of recipient mice 13 days post transplantation. GFP+ cells (coexpressed with sgRNA) were sorted by FACS and were subjected to cytospin preparation onto glass slides. The samples were stained with May-Grünwald (Merck) and Giemsa (Merck) for microscopic imaging using Nikon Eclipse 50i microscope at 100x magnification with oil immersion. The images were acquired using Leica DFC320 camera and Leica IM500 acquisition software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Lung Inflammation Histological Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the end of the model mice were sacrificed for further analysis at the indicated time points. To collect the BALF, lungs were flushed three times with 0.8 ml PBS, supplemented with 0.5M ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Supernatants were stored until further analysis and the lavage pellets were prepared for differential counts on Cytospins. Cytospin preparations were stained according to Pappenheim, with Giemsa (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe) and May-Grünwald (Merck) stains. Differential counts of eosinophils, neutrophils, macrophages, and lymphocytes were performed on a total of 400 cells per sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Morphological Analysis of Myeloid Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For morphological analysis of myeloid cell differentiation, cytospins were prepared by centrifugation (1.200 rpm, 10 min) of 5 × 104 primary AML cells on microscope slides (Paul Marienfeld GmbH, Lauda-Königshofen, Germany) using a Shandon Cytospin 3 Cytocentrifuge (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) and air drying for 5 min. Subsequently, cytospin slides were stained for 3 min with May-Grünwald (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and afterward for 13 min with 25% Giemsa solution (Merck). For each condition, 200 cells were analyzed for cellular morphology and counted by two individuals independently using a Leica DMLB light microscope type 020-519.511 (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany) and Color Video Camera model MC-3289 (Horn Imaging GmbH, Aalen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Hematological Analysis of Fish Blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hematocrit (Hct) was determined immediately from sampled blood of five fish per tank (n = 3 tanks/group) using Vitex Pari microhematocrit capillary tubes (Vitrex Medical A/S, Denmark) and a microhematocrit centrifuge (Haematofuge, Heraeus-Christ GmbH, Germany). The number of red blood cells (RBC) and amount of hemoglobin (Hb) in full blood were measured in a Cell Dyn 400 Hematological Analyzer (Sequoia- Turner) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, using Para 12 Extend control blood (Streck, MedMark Ref:218777) for calibration. Mean corpuscular volume (MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) were calculated from Hct, RBC and Hb as described in Sandnes et al. [25 ]. For a differential white blood cell count, blood smears were prepared on glass slides from a drop of heparinized blood. The smears were air dried, fixed in methanol for 5 min at room temperature, and stained with 50% May-Grünwald (Merck, Germany) and 10% Giemsa (Merck, Germany). The slides were examined in a light microscope using 60x and 100x magnifications, and a total of 100 leucocytes were counted and classified as neutrophils, lymphocytes or monocytes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Trypomastigote Infection of IFNγ-Treated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confluent HFF or U3A cells were either left untreated or treated with IFNγ (5 ng/ml) for 6, 12 or 24 h, as indicated, before the cells were infected with trypomastigotes with a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 2 or 10. After 24 h of infection, remaining parasites in the culture medium that had not infected cells were removed by washing, and infected cells were replaced in fresh DMEM for an additional 48 h. The cells were then fixed with ice-cold methanol and stained with crystal violet and May-Grünwald (both from Merck). The mean numbers of infected cells and intracellular amastigotes per cell were blindly counted in 10 non-overlapping high power microscopic fields in three independent experiments performed in duplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Bronchoalveolar Lavage Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For BALF collection, the tracheas were cannulated with a 20-gauge catheter, after which the lungs were lavaged three times with 0.8 ml of PBS. Supernatants were stored and the pellets prepared for Cytospin. Differential cell counts were performed on Cytospin preparations stained according to Pappenheim, with Giemsa (Merck) and May-Grünwald (Merck) stains. A total of 400 cells were counted under a light microscope to classify eosinophils.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!