The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spss statistics for macos version 26

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS Statistics for MacOS, version 26.0 is a statistical software package developed by IBM. It provides data management, analysis, and reporting capabilities for a variety of research and business applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using spss statistics for macos version 26

1

Diagnostic Accuracy of Glycemic Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Categorical outcomes were described using frequencies and proportions, while continuous variables were described using means ± standard deviations (SDs) or medians and interquartile ranges (IQR) when appropriate. Group differences were evaluated using 95% confidence intervals, and p‐values were reported according to two‐tailed analysis and considered statistically significant when <.05. Linear correlations among FPG, HbA1c, and 2hPG were reported using Pearson's r. Classifier performance was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) obtained by ROC curve analysis, and exploratory cut‐off points were identified for clinical application. For the diagnosis of IGT and IGT and/or IFG, the ordinal variables were dichotomized by excluding patients with diabetes. Area‐proportional Venn diagrams were drawn using eulerAPE_3.0.0.31 Calculations were performed using Microsoft Excel 2020 for macOS (Microsoft Corporation), IBM SPSS Statistics for macOS Version 26.0 (IBM), and R 4.0.3 (R Core Team, 2020).
We used the Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) statement to ensure completeness of reporting32(Appendix S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis Tools for Research Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following software programs were used at various stages of the evaluation process to generate graphics as well as for data description and statistics: IBM SPSS Statistics for Mac OS, version 26.0 (IBM Corp), and R, version 3.5.2 (The R Foundation), along with the R packages dplyr [26 ], ggplot2 [27 ], RColorBrewer [28 ], arsenal [29 ], qwraps2 [30 ], Hmisc [31 ], DescTools [32 ], and rcompanion [33 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Evaluating Periodontitis Risk Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analysis, if not specified, was conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics for MacOS, version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA), and a two-sided p-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. A normality test was practiced on all variances we collected.
We set OSA as the risk factor and periodontitis as the outcome, and the χ² test was applied to measure the difference in prevalence of periodontitis between variables. The differences between the mean values of PD were then evaluated between two groups using the independent t-test.
The comparison of sequencing data between two groups were firstly tested for the homogeneity of variance, and then followed by one-way ANOVA or Wilcoxon rank sum test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of Vaccine Acceptance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for MacOS, version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Categorical variables were presented as numbers and percentages, whereas continuous variables were presented as median with an interquartile range (IQR) or mean with standard deviation (SD) according to the data distribution. Pearson chi-square, Fisher exact test, and Yates continuity correction tests were used to compare categorical variables. For continuous variables, if the data are normally distributed independent t-test was used to compare the means of two independent groups; if not, the Mann–Whitney U test or Kruskal–Wallis test was used. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was calculated for the reliability analysis of the VAX Scale. For logistic regression, variables with a p-value of < 0.25 were included in the model.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Analyzing Symptom Changes in Neurological Interventions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Estimates of monthly symptoms decrease within groups were calculated using linear mixed models (with time as a fixed factor). We adopted mixed-effect regression models with random intercepts, with time and target playing the role of covariates. The hypothesis under test is a difference in the rate of change between the two slopes (as measured by the YGTSS and the YBOCS) of the am-GPi and Voi-Cm/Pf cohorts.
A series of post hoc comparisons were then carried out between baseline and follow-ups time points within each group. Adjustment for multiple comparisons was made utilizing the Bonferroni method.
The results were analyzed using SPSS (IBM Corp. 2020 Release, IBM SPSS Statistics for MacOs, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY, USA). All p-values reported are two-tailed, and a p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, and range) were used for continuous variables and frequency for categorical data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Respiratory Function Comparison in Ventilated Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Descriptive analysis was carried out. Categorical variables were presented as numbers, and continuous data were expressed as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR, with 95% CI) as a measure of variability. Due to the small sample size, the Krustal-Wallis test for non-parametric data was used to assess the difference between RFT and ABG values at different times. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used for comparison between paired times. Before data analysis we tested randomness (P>0.05) and checked that all observations were independent. All analyses were performed with SPSS (IBM Corp. Released 2019. IBM SPSS Statistics for MacOs, Version 26.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Triplicate Assay Evaluation with ANOVA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The performed assays were carried out in triplicate. The obtained results were presented as mean values ± standard deviation (SD). Means and standard deviations were calculated using Microsoft Excel. SPSS Statistics software (IBM SPSS Statistics for Mac OS, Version 26.0; IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used to determine differences between samples. The results were subject to an analysis of variance (ANOVA), while the Tukey's honest significance test (HSD) test (p = 0.05) was used to determine the significant differences among samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Epidemiological Analysis of Disease Prevalence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Categorical variables were presented as count (percent), normally distributed continuous variables were presented as mean (SD), and not normally distributed variables were presented as median (interquartile range [IQR]). Pearson's chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables between groups; Bonferroni correction was applied when necessary. For the comparison of continuous variables between groups, Student's t, Mann–Whitney U, ANOVA, and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used depending on the number of compared groups and distribution of variables.
Logistic regression models, the Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used as necessary.
IBM SPSS Statistics for MacOS, version 26 (IBM, Armonk, NY), was used for all data analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis Methodology for Research

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were performed using commercial software (R 3.6.2 GUI 1.70 El Capitan build, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; IBM SPSS Statistics for MacOS, Version 26, IBM Corp., Armonk, New York). Statistical significance was determined as P < .05. Numerical continuous variables were assessed for normality by visual inspection of histogram and using the Shapiro‐Wilk test. The assumption of equal variances was tested using Levene's test. Most data were not normally distributed; therefore, for consistency, all numerical data are presented as median [25th, 75th percentile].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Evaluating Smartphone-Captured Urine Colorimetry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS statistics version 26 for MacOS. All continuous variables were tested for normality with Shapiro–Wilk test. Demographic data, urine analysis, management during ED stay and outcome of the patients were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Parametric variables were reported in mean and standard deviation, while nonparametric variables were reported in median and interquartile range. Urine RGB values were obtained with and without colour correction for the five different smartphones under five different lighting conditions. Inter-rater (inter-phone) and intra-rater (intra-phone) agreements in urine RGB values were analyzed using ICC. The ICC analyses to what extent the subjects under investigation agree with each other with repeated measurements.28 (link) For the urine RGB values taken with five different smartphones under five different lighting conditions to be accepted as reliable, the variances in RGB values must be sufficiently small. ICC is the true variance over total variance inclusive of both true and error variance and is calculated as: ICC=kσm2σ2(k1)σ2 where k is the data set size, σ2 is the total variance and σm2 is the variance of the means of the families.28 (link),29 (link) Reliability was categorized as ‘poor’ (<0.5), ‘moderate’ (0.5–0.75), ‘good’ (0.76–0.9) and ‘exceptional’ (>0.91).29 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!