The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

20 protocols using x0931

1

Immunostaining of Optically Cleared Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following primary antibodies were used for immunostaining of optically cleared tissues: polyclonal rabbit anti‐α‐smooth muscle actin (SMA) (Abcam; ab5694; 1 : 300); and from (BioLegend UK Ltd, London, UK): rat anti‐CD45 clone 30‐F11 (103102; 1 : 300), CD11c clone N418 (117302; 1 : 200) and MHCII I‐A/I‐E clone M5/114.15.2 (107601; 1 : 300). The following macrophage markers were found to be unreliable with the tissue clearing protocols used: rat anti‐F4/80 (clone BM8), rat anti‐CD11b (clone M1/70), rat anti‐CD68 (clone FA‐11) (all from BioLegend) and rat anti‐F4/80 (clone Cl:A3‐1; from AbD Serotec, Kidlington, UK). The following secondary antibodies (all used at 1 : 500) were purchased from Invitrogen: goat anti‐rabbit Alexa Fluor 488 (A11008), goat anti‐rat Alexa Fluor 647 (A21247) and goat anti‐rat Cy3 (A10522); and from (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Ely, UK): goat anti‐Armenian hamster Cy3 (127‐165‐160).
For 2D analysis, SMA expression was detected using a mouse anti‐human SMA primary antibody (clone 1A4, Agilent; M0851) with a peroxidase‐conjugated ImmPRESS anti‐mouse IgG polymer detection kit (Vector Laboratories Ltd; MP‐7402, Peterborough, UK) using standard development with DAB. Mouse IgG1 was used for species‐ and isotype‐matched control (Agilent; X0931).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of Neuroinflammation and Tissue Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bain sections were incubated overnight with primary antibodies at 4 °C. Primary antibody staining was detected with fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibodies. Images were captured using a NanoZoomer S60 Digital slide scanner (Hamamatsu, Japan). Cell counting (neutrophil and caspase3) and immunostaining area (hemoglobin and IgG) were performed by 2 independent operators blinded to the treatment of the animals by using ImageJ software with thresholds set according to signal intensity. For the evaluation of Hb staining in the infarcted brain, we quantified the percentage of area of Hb immunostaining by using ImageJ software (2 different zones were chosen (1: cortex and 2: striatum) with 5–7 sections analyzed per mice). The following primary antibodies were used: rabbit anti-hemoglobin (1:200, ab191183, Abcam, Paris, France), rat anti-neutrophil (1:200, ab2557, Abcam, Paris, France), Alexa-Fluor 594 Donkey anti-mouse IgG (1:500, X0931, Dako, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and rabbit anti-caspase-3 (1:100, ab13847, Abcam, Paris, France). The following secondary antibodies were used: Alexa-Fluor 488 Donkey anti-Rabbit (1:1000, A-21206, invitrogen Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and Alexa-Fluor 594 Donkey anti-Rat (1:500, A-21209, invitrogen Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Histological Analysis of Redifferentiated Chondrocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At day 14 of redifferentiation, the alginate beads of all three donors and six conditions were fixed overnight in 100 mM CaCl2 in 4% neutral buffered formaldehyde solution and thereafter dehydrated in ethanol.43 The next day, the alginate beads were embedded in paraffin, 5 μm sections were cut and stained with H&E (109249 and 115935, Merck). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining for collagen type I and II was performed as described previously.44 IHC for aggrecan (mouse monoclonal recombinant antibody, 4 μg/ml; ab3778, Abcam) was performed for collagen type I and II, but with 60 instead of 30 min of 1 mg/ml pronase and 10 mg/ml hyaluronidase antigen retrieval treatment. Cytokeratin 19 (mouse monoclonal antibody, 10 μg/ml; ab9221, Abcam) IHC was performed without any antigen retrieval. Cytokeratin 8 (mouse monoclonal antibody, 10 μg/ml; MA1‐19037, Thermofisher) and PAX1 (rabbit polyclonal, 4 μg/ml; ab203065, Abcam) IHC was performed with 10 mM citrate buffer (pH 6, 70°C) antigen retrieval for 60 and 30 min, respectively. As negative control in all IHCs, normal mouse IgG1 (X0931, Dako), or Rabbit IgG polyclonal isotype control (ab37415, Abcam) was applied at a similar concentration as the primary antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Staining of Ki67

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Slides were dewaxed in 3 5-min xylene baths, rehydrated in 2 1-min methanol baths and rinsed for 1 min in tap water.
For haematoxylin and eosin staining, sections were then incubated with Mayer’s haematoxylin for 3 min, rinsed for 1 min in tap water, incubated with eosin for 3 min and rinsed for 1 min with tap water before proceeding to dehydration.
To stain for Ki67, slides were then rinsed in 2 2-min PBS baths, boiled for 25 min in sodium citrate buffer (5 mM citrate and 5 mM sodium citrate, pH adjusted to 6.1), rinsed for 1 min in tap water then in 2 2-min PBS baths, blocked for 10 m in 3% peroxide diluted in PBS, rinsed in 2 2-min PBS baths, blocked for 30 m in 20% rabbit serum diluted in PBS, incubated for 60 m in 1:100 anti-Ki67 antibody (Dako M7240) or 1:217 (to match concentration) IgG control (Dako X0931), rinsed in 2 2-min PBS baths, incubated for 1 h in secondary antibody (Dako P026), rinsed in 2 2-min PBS baths, incubated for 10 m in DAB (abcam ab64238), rinsed for 1 min in tap water, incubated for 3 min in haematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich MHS16) and rinsed for 1 min before proceeding to dehydration.
Following staining, all slides were dehydrated in 3 1-min methanol baths and 2 3-min xylene baths, then coverslipped with DPX mountant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Flow Cytometry Analysis of IL-17RA and IL-17RE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Epithelial and neutrophil IL-17RA and IL-17RE expression was investigated by flow cytometry. Cells were infected as mentioned above and stained with primary mouse anti-human IL-17RA antibody (MAB177, 5 μg/ml, RnD Systems, Denmark) or rabbit anti-human IL-17RE antibody (1 μg/ml, ab77527, Abcam, see S1 Fig for optimization). The cells were washed two times in PBS and stained with secondary goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit IgG (1:300, Alexa Flour 488, Life Technologies, Carlsbad CA, USA) antibody for 30 min on ice. Mouse IgG (5 μg/ml, X0931, Dako, Denmark) or rabbit IgG (1 μg/ml, X0936, Dako, Denmark) were used as isotype controls and unstained cells were used as negative background control. Cells were washed twice in PBS and analyzed by flow cytometry in a FACSCalibur instrument (Becton Dickinson, Oxford, UK). A total of 5000 gated events were collected per sample, and data were analysed by Cytobank software[34 (link)]. Median fluorescence intensities (MFI) were calculated and compared to uninfected control or isotype control, whichever was highest.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Angiogenesis in Matrigel

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Twenty images from mid-Matrigel H & E sections of all animals in vehicle and propranolol groups were taken randomly at 40× (Zeiss Axiophot II, equipped with AxioCam MRc5 and supplemented with AxioVision Rel. 4.8 software). Luminal structures containing at least one RBC were counted as one vessel; the average from 20 images was expressed as vessels/mm2. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded mid-Matrigel sections were processed and stained with mouse anti-human CD31 (1:40, Dako M0823) or mouse IgG (1:40, Dako X0931) as described18 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Analysis of Insulin and IGF-1 Receptors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The relative expressions of IR and IGF-IR in all cell lines were determined using two methods: (i) western blotting and densitometry and (ii) a fluorescence-activated cell sorting -based receptor quantification system using QIFIKIT (indirect immunofluorescence staining in flow cytometry) (Dako, Denmark) according to manufacturer’s protocols using either the murine monoclonal antibody 83–7 against the human IR (10 ug/ml), 24–31 against the human IGF-IR (10 ug/ml), or an isotype control antibody (Dako, X0931, 10 ug/ml). Cells were then analysed using an LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Automated Immunohistochemical Staining for HIF-1α

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Methods for tissue microarray construction were previously described (Eustace et al, 2013a (link)). Immunohistochemistry was carried out for CAIX and GLUT1 as per a previous protocol (Hoskin et al, 2003 (link)). HIF-1α staining was carried out using the Bond-Max Automated staining system (Leica Biosystems, Newcastle, UK). Samples were de-waxed and rehydrated, followed by antigen retrieval at pH 9.0 for 40 min at 100 °C. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked using 3% hydrogen peroxide solution. Primary antibody (mouse monoclonal HIF-1α, BD Biosciences 610959, Oxford, UK) was diluted to a 1 : 20 solution with diluent and incubated with samples for 15 min at room temperature. A negative control of IgG1 (Dako X0931, Cambridge, UK) was also used. Post-primary rabbit anti-mouse link reagent was applied (Bond Polymer Refine Detection System, Leica DS9800, Newcastle, UK), and samples were incubated for 8 min at room temperature. The anti-rabbit polymer-HRP detection reagent (Bond Polymer Refine Detection System, Leica) was then added and samples were incubated at room temperature for a further 8 min. 3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride was added, and after a further 10 min of incubation samples were counterstained with haematoxylin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Evaluating Cartilage Tissue Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To macroscopically evaluate pellet size of 14-days cultured pellets, pictures were taken using a microscope (Wild M3B, Heerbrugg, Switzerland). Subsequently, pellets were fixed in 4% formalin for 14 hours, embedded in paraffin and sectioned (6 μm). Sections were stained with 0.1% aqueous Safranin O (Brunschwig Chemie, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), resulting in red-staining of negatively-charged GAGs. As counter-staining, 0.1% aqueous Fast Green (Brunschwig Chemie) was used to stain the cytoplasm blue/green.
For immunohistochemical staining of collagen type II, sections were pre-treated with 1 mg/mL pronase and 10 mg/mL hyaluronidase (Sigma-Aldrich), and then incubated with 0.4 μg/mL antibody specific for collagen type II (#II-II6B3, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Iowa City, IA, USA) or 0.4 μg/mL mouse-IgG1 (#X0931, Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Following incubation with alkaline phosphatase (AP)-conjugated secondary antibody (1:50, #HK-321-UK, Biogenex, San Ramon, CA, USA), AP-activity was visualized (magenta color) by incubation with new-fuchsin substrate. Sections were counterstained with haematoxylin (purple) to visualize nuclei.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical analysis of TGF-beta signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After resection, the tissues were embedded in paraffin and 5 μm sections were cut for immunohistochemistry. Sections were processed as previously described [6 (link)], and incubated with the primary antibodies for TGFb2 (1:200, PA5–32629, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA), TGFbR1 (abcam, ab31013, 1:200); MEK1/MAP 2 K1, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA1–095, 1:10000) and with isotype control rabbit IgG (02–6102, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, USA) or mouse IgG, (Dako, X0931), with 1.5% normal horse serum (PK-7800, RTU Vectastain, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, USA) in PBS. For each patient, and for each immunostaining reaction, we photographed 10 zones of epithelium selected at random, at a magnification of × 20. Analyses were performed with Image J analysis software (http://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/). Immunostaining in epithelial cells (brown) and nucleus counterstaining (purple) signals were separated and converted into greyscale intensities with the Colour Deconvolution plugin of Image J software. Two of the authors (GL and SV) analysed the staining blind and independently of each other. The ratio of immunostaining to counterstaining intensities was calculated for each Image.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!