The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

20 protocols using gf a filter

1

Oligopeptide Uptake Kinetics in Yeast

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Yeast cells grown exponentially in the YNB-SG medium were harvested by centrifugation (3000 ×g, 5 min), washed with 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 5.0 or 6.5), and suspended in the same buffer containing 1% glucose, to a final cell density corresponding to A660 ≅ 1.0. The cell suspension was incubated at 30°C. After 10 min, an oligopeptide solution was added, to give a final concentration of 100 μM. At that moment and at 5 min intervals thereafter, 2 mL samples of the cell suspension were withdrawn, immediately filtered through the Whatman GF/A filters and the filtrates were used to determine the residual peptide concentration. Then, the 1 mL portions of the filtrates were taken and combined with 1.25 mL aliquots of a solution containing 4% Na2B4O7 × 10 H2O and 0.8 mg mL-1 of 2,4,6-trinitrobenzenesulfonate. The reaction was carried out at 37°C for 30 min. The A420 values were measured and the peptide concentration was read from the appropriate standard curve. Data were plotted as nanomoles of an oligopeptide, taken up by 1 mg (dry weight) of cells versus time. The initial uptake velocities were determined from the slopes of the linear part of the curves, in the 0- to 10-min region.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Extraction and Analysis of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
About 5 g of each propolis sample was extracted three times ultrasonically with 20 mL of hexane for a 15 min period each in a 150 mL precleaned and annealed beaker. Hexane dissolves mainly non-polar compounds such as hydrocarbons. The combined extract was filtered through an annealed glass fiber filter to remove the undissolved propolis particles. The filtrate was first concentrated on a rotary evaporator and then reduced using a stream of dry nitrogen gas to a volume of approximately 200 μL. The volume was finally adjusted to exactly 500 μL by hexane. About 5 g of fresh asphalt sample was rinsed with about 15 ml hexane in a precleaned and annealed beaker, and filtered using a glass fiber filter. The filtrate was also adjusted to a 500 μL final volume.
After air drying, each soil sample was sieved to obtain the fine particles (<125 μm) before extraction of the total soluble organic matter (SOM). The extraction for soil and filter was performed twice by adding a mixture of dichloromethane/methanol (40 mL 3:1 v/v) to about 5 g of the particles of each soil sample and the filter, ultra-sonicating for 20 min, and then filtering through pre-extracted glass microfiber filters (Whatman, GF/A filters). Each total SOM extract was concentrated under nitrogen blow-down at room temperature to approximately 1.0–1.5 mL before GC-MS analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Radioligand Binding Assay in tsA201 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Radioligand binding to transiently transfected tsA201 cells was performed as described previously (30 (link), 34 (link)) with [3H]α-bungarotoxin (specific activity, 56 Ci/mmol; Tocris Bioscience). Transfected cells were resuspended in Hank's buffered saline solution (Invitrogen) containing 1% bovine serum albumin and incubated with [3H]α-bungarotoxin for 2 h at 22 °C in a total volume of 150 μl. Nonspecific binding was determined in the presence of methyllycaconitine (MLA) (1 μm). Competition binding experiments were performed by incubating triplicate samples of transfected cells with [3H]α-bungarotoxin (10 nm), together with a range of concentrations (1–100 μm) of 2,3,6MP-TQS or 2,6MP-TQS and 100 μm of all other allosteric modulators in this study. Radioligand binding was assayed by filtration onto Whatman GF/A filters (presoaked in 0.5% polyethylenimine), followed by rapid washing with phosphate-buffered saline (Oxoid) using a Brandel cell harvester. Bound radioligand was determined by scintillation counting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Yeast Growth Rate Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
10 ml of yeast cell culture were grown in synthetic complete medium lacking tryptophan at 30°C to OD600 = 0.6–0.7. Mix of l-(U-14C) amino acids (CFB104, Amersham Inc., Bucks, England) was added to a final concentration of 0.00925 MBq/ml. One ml culture samples were taken every 15 min over 2 h of growth at 30°C. 100 μl of sample were used for optical density measurement, remaining 900 μl were precipitated by addition of 200 μl of 50% TCA. Samples were incubated 10 min on ice followed by 20 min at 70°C, and precipitates were collected onto Whatman GF/A filters (Whatman, Maidstone, England). Filters were washed three times with 5% TCA, three times with 70% ethanol and dried at 65°C for 10 min. Radioactivity was measured by scintillation counting. The dpm (disintegrations per minute) values divided by optical density values of the sample were plotted against the corresponding time points, slopes of obtained curves were calculated. The average and standard deviations for at least four biological replicates were calculated. Statistical significance was determined by the unpaired two sample Student's t test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Radioligand Binding Assay for Nicotinic Receptors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
[3H]-α-bungarotoxin ([3H]-αBTX; 56 Ci/mmol; Tocris Bioscience, Bristol, UK) was a gift from Syngenta (Bracknell, UK). Radioligand binding to transiently transfected tsA201 cells was performed essentially as described previously (Lansdell and Millar, 2004 (link)). Transfected cells were resuspended in Hank's buffered saline solution (Gibco, Paisley, UK) containing 1% BSA and incubated with [3H]-αBTX for 2 h at room temperature in a total volume of 300 μl. Non-specific binding was determined in the presence of nicotine (1 mM) and carbamylcholine (1 mM). Saturation binding experiments were performed by incubating triplicate samples of transfected cells with varying concentrations of [3H]-αBTX. Radioligand binding was assayed by filtration onto Whatman GF/A filters (pre-soaked in 0.5% polyethylenimine), followed by rapid washing with phosphate-buffered saline (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) using a Brandel cell harvester. Bound radioligand was quantified by scintillation counting. Curves for equilibrium binding were fitted using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Measuring DNA Synthesis in Chromium-Treated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Activation of the S-phase checkpoint was determined using the method of Garg et al [14 ]. HeLa cells were prelabeled for ~24 hr by culture in DMEM containing 10 nCi/mL [14C]-thymidine. Following prelabeling, the medium containing [14C]-thymidine was replaced with normal DMEM, and the cells were incubated for 6 hr. The cells were then treated with Cr for 4 hours, followed by pulse-labeling with 2.5 μCi/mL [3H]-thymidine for 15 min. Following pulse-labeling, cells were harvested, washed twice with PBS, and fixed in cold (-4 °C) 70% methanol. Afterwards, the cells were applied to Whatman GF/A filters which were then rinsed sequentially in 70% and 95% methanol, air dried, and then placed in glass vials containing 3 ml of scintillation fluid. The filters were then analyzed on a Beckman scintillation counter with windows set to record both 14C and 3H dpm. The measure of DNA synthesis was derived from resulting ratios of3H cpm to 14C cpm and corrected for counts resulting from channel crossover.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Metagenomic Extraction and Sequencing from Environmental Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 10 L of water was pre-filtered through ∼1.6 mm GF/A filters (Whatman) and cells were collected on 0.22 μm Sterivex filters (Millipore) using a peristaltic pump. Sterivex filters were stored at −80°C until DNA extraction. DNA was extracted as described in [29] (link). Briefly, filters were treated with lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, 40 mM EDTA, and 0.75 M sucrose) and incubated with 1 mg/ml lysozyme at 37°C for 30 min. Samples were subsequently incubated with 1% SDS, 10 mg/ml proteinase K, and 150 mg/ml RNAse for 2 h rotating at 55°C. DNA was extracted from the lysate with phenol and chloroform, precipitated with ethanol and eluted in TE buffer. DNA yield was about 1.5 μg per liter of water filtered. For the metagenome, ∼5 μg of the total DNA aliquot was sequenced using the Illumina GA-II sequencers at the Emory University Genomics Facility, providing paired-end reads with an average length of 100 bp (Table S4 in File S1). 16S rRNA gene amplicon pyrosequencing (see below) was run on the GS-FLX 454 Titanium platform, also at the Emory University Genomics Facility.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fungal Production and Purification of HFBI-DCBM Fusion Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DCBMs were produced as HFBI-DCBM fusions in T. reesei as described in details in earlier work of the group19 (DCBM sequences in Supplementary Figure S1) and the following transformants were used: VTT-D-133335 (HFBI-DCBM-12), VTT-D-133336 (HFBI-DCBM-24), and VTT-D-133337 (HFBI-DCBM-48). The strains were then cultivated in 7 L bioreactors on media containing 50 vol-% spent grain extract, 60 g/L lactose, 1 g/L yeast extract, 4 g/L KH2PO4, 2.8 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 0.6 g/L MgSO4 ∙ 7H2O, 0.8 g/L CaCl2 ∙ 2H2O, 2 ml/L trace solution. The pH was let to drop from 5 to about 3 during cultivation. At 24 h intervals 48 mg pepstatin A and 28 mg soy bean trypsin inhibitors (both from Sigma-Aldrich) were added to the cultures to minimize protein degradation. The culture supernatants were separated from the biomass by filtration through GF/A filters (Whatman). Protein expression levels were analyzed by RP-UPLC and were 0.2 g/L, 0.4 g/L, and 3.0 g/L for HFBI-DCBM-12, −24, and −48, respectively. The proteins were purified using aqueous two phase extraction and reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) as described earlier35 (link) followed by lyophilization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Profiling Microbiomes in Great Lakes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We collected water samples from multiple stations in each of the five Laurentian Great Lakes (Fig. 1A, Table S1) aboard the R/V Lake Guardian during the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Spring and Summer Survey cruises in 2012 and 2013. At each station, the CTD/rosette sampler generated temperature, fluorescence, dissolved oxygen and turbidity depth profiles as it descended through the water column and collected water samples from specific depths as it ascended to the surface. For every sampling event, we collected water from the surface (~2 m) and 10 m from the bottom, with the exception of comparatively shallow stations in Lake Erie (11–60 m) where bottom samples were collected 1 m from the bottom. During Summer Surveys, the water column of each lake was stratified and we collected samples from two additional depths: the DCL (if present) and the middle of the hypolimnion, an intermediate depth between the upper hypolimnion and bottom of the lake. Water samples (4.5–8 L) were pre‐filtered through GF/A filters (Whatman) and microorganisms were concentrated onto 0.22 μm Millipore Sterivex filters (SVGP01050) in 2012 and 0.22 μm Millipore Express Plus filters (GPWP04700) in 2013 using a peristaltic pump. Filters were stored at −80°C prior to DNA extraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Density Separation and Peroxidation for Microplastic Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Glass jars containing the sediment samples were covered with tin foil and freeze dried for 5 days. The sediment was thoroughly mixed and three subsamples of three replicates of 30 (± 2) g each were taken and transferred to individual Falcon tubes (n = 9, three per replicate). The remaining sediment was weighed.
Density separation was carried out by adding a saturated Sodium Iodide (NaI) solution (density = 1.79 g/cm3) to the Falcon tubes. The material was thoroughly mixed into suspension in the density solution and allowed to settle out completely. The supernatant was passed through a 75 µm sieve and the retained material (>75 µm) was transferred to an Erlenmeyer flask. This process was repeated a second time to enhance the recovery of microplastic from the sample. The >75 µm material from the first extraction was then subject to peroxidation using H2O2 to reduce the organic content. Briefly, 30 ml of 30% H2O2 was added to the sediment samples. An ice bath was prepared, and the Erlenmeyer flasks were placed in the ice bath if the reaction became too violent or if the temperature exceeded 40 °C. Temperatures higher than this can damage the microplastic. The samples were left in a laminar flow cabinet for 24 h, and the remaining material was vacuum filtered onto Whatman GF/A-filters. The >75 µm material from the second extraction was filtered directly onto GF/A-filters.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!