The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Gelcompar 2 software version 6

Manufactured by bioMérieux
Sourced in Belgium

GelCompar II software version 6.5 is a software tool for the analysis and comparison of gel-based electrophoretic patterns. The core function of the software is to provide a platform for the organization, analysis, and comparison of gel-based data, such as those obtained from techniques like pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using gelcompar 2 software version 6

1

Genetic Fingerprinting of S. aureus Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The PFGE method was used to determine the genetic relationship among the investigated S. aureus isolates, following the previously described method with modifications [20 (link)]. The electrophoresis was performed using a CHEF-DR® II PFGE apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
The similarity of the PFGE profiles was compared according to the percentage similarity of the profiles estimated by the Dice coefficient and grouped by UPGMA (unweighted pair group arithmetic mean method) using GelCompar II software version 6.5 (Applied Maths). The analysis used S. aureus ATCC® 25923™ as a reference strain.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

ITS Fragment Amplification and RFLP Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 was amplified from the cell-free DNA lysate using primers ITS1 and ITS4 mentioned elsewhere. The amplification was carried out in a 25 μL final reaction volume containing 50 ng of the genomic DNA as previously described [41 (link)]. The amplified ITS fragment was analyzed by 2.0% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis at 80 V in 0.5× TBE (45 mM Tris-borate, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) buffer to check its intactness and absence of non-specific amplification. The PCR product (4 μL) was digested with 5 U of TaqI (Promega, Madison, USA) in a 10 μL reaction volume at 65°C as per manufacturer’s instructions. The restriction patterns were analyzed by electrophoresis of the 10 μL reaction volume on 2.0% (w/v) agarose gel in parallel with PCR 100 bp Low DNA ladder (Sigma-Aldrich) as molecular size standard. The electrophoresis was run at 80 V for 2 h in 0.5× TBE buffer. The gel was then stained in 0.5 μg/mL ethidium bromide solution for 30 min with rocking at 15 rpm on a platform rocker (Tarsons, Kolkata, India). After destaining for 30 min in sterile deionized water, the gel was photographed using ChemiDoc MP gel documentation system (Bio Rad, Hercules, USA). The restriction fingerprints were analysed for the absence or presence of discriminating fragments using GelCompar II software, version 6.5 (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Clonal Analysis of ESBL-E Isolates from Horses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Of the total of 139 ESBL-E isolates, 118 isolates from 84 horses were available for further investigation. PFGE typing was performed for the 118 isolates according to the PulseNet O157 protocol [21 ]. Clonal similarity of the strains was determined [22 (link)] and analysed by UPGMA-cluster analysis with 0.5% optimization and 1% Dice band matching tolerance with a ≥ 85% similarity cut off value using GelCompar II software version 6.5 (Applied Maths NV, Belgium).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for Nocardia seriolae identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PFGE was performed using 50 U XbaI or AseI (New England BioLabs) as previously described [20 (link)]. The type strain, N. seriolae BCRC 13745 (JCM 3360; isolated from the spleen of farmed yellowtail in Nagasaki Prefecture, Japan, ca. 1974), was included for comparative purposes. Gels of DNA fragments were analysed using GelCompar II software version 6.5 (Applied Maths). Gel bands were automatically assigned by the software and were checked and corrected manually. Only clearly resolved bands were considered for further analysis. A dendrogram was constructed using an unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) approach and the Dice similarity coefficient, with band optimization and band position tolerances of 1.0 %. Isolates that showed similarity between the banding profiles of ≥80 % (fewer than six bands of difference) were defined as indistinguishable or clonally related, whereas patterns with <80 % similarity (six or more bands of difference) represented different clusters of unrelated strains [29, 30 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!