The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

24 protocols using sp8 inverted microscope

1

Zebrafish embryo live-imaging protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Embryos were anaesthetized in 0.01% tricaine and pre-selected based on the expression of the desired fluorophore using a Nikon ZMZ18 fluorescent stereoscope. Embryos were embedded in 1–1.2% low-melting (LM) agarose (PeqGOLD Low Melt Agarose, PeqLab Biotechnologie GmbH), dissolved in E3 medium with 0.01% tricaine. Embryos were mounted on glass-bottom dishes (Greiner Bio-One #627871) for confocal microscopy or pulled together with agar into glass capillaries (Brand, #701904) with a rod (Brand, #701932), and then pushed halfway out, into the microscopy chamber for light-sheet microscopy. Both the imaging dishes and the microscopy chamber were filled with E3 medium containing 0.002% PTU and 0.01% tricaine during the entire imaging period. For confocal microscopy in Figure 6—figure supplement 1, Leica SP8 Inverted microscope with a Leica ×40/NA 1.1 WI objective was used to capture 75-μm-thick stacks with z-step of 1 μm. For all other confocal microscopy, an Andor Dragonfly 200 Sona spinning-disc microscope with a Nikon ×20/NA 0.95 WI objective and 40 μm spinning disc was used to capture imaging 70–75-μm-thick stacks with z-steps of 2 μm, every 60 s. For light-sheet microscopy, a Zeiss Z.1 microscope with a W Plan-APO ×20/NA 1.0 WI imaging objective and ×10/NA 0.2 air illumination objectives was used to capture 40–75-μm-thick stacks with a z-step of 0.5–0.75 μm, every 15–30 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

FRAP Measurements of FisB Binding to GUVs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FRAP measurements were conducted using a Leica SP8 inverted microscope in the same open imaging chamber. As described above, GUVs were diluted in RB-EDTA (25 mM HEPES at pH 7.4, 850140 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM tris(2-carboxyethyl) phosphine) and incubated with 1 μM FisB ECD for 2–3h. A rectangular area was chosen to bleach as indicated in Figure 2C. Five images (laser power 0.7%) were recorded before bleaching, 10 during bleaching (laser power 100%) and 60 after bleaching (laser power 0.7%).
The mean GUV intensity was determined using ImageJ. A segmented line (10 pixels wide) was drawn to manually follow the GUV membrane. The line was smoothed using ‘fit spine’ and the mean pixel intensity was calculated. The background was determined as the mean pixel value of a 20 × 20-pixel box (close to but outside the GUVs) and subtracted from the mean pixel intensity of the GUVs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Photobleaching Assay for Centriole Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To prepare cells for photobleaching experiments, WT and PLK4 KO mTECs expressing GFP-Centrin were isolated and differentiated as described above. On ALI day 3, the filters with adhered cells were cut out from the transwell insert and inverted onto a glass coverslip with a drop of differentiation media. A plastic ring was placed on top of the filter to keep it in contact with the coverslip. Cells were imaged on a Leica Sp8 inverted microscope using a 63×/1.4 NA objective. An region of interest (ROI) was drawn around all or part of a GFP-Centrin signal at the centrioles or aggregates and photobleached to approximately 80% of the pre-bleach fluorescence intensity with 10 pulses of 488 nm laser light (1039 ms exposure). A Z-series of 13 planes (0.5 μm step size) was acquired immediately before and after bleaching. GFP-Centrin fluorescence intensities within the bleached ROI were measured using ImageJ. The first post-bleach intensity was subtracted from the pre-bleach and post-bleach values and then normalized to give the percentage of the pre-bleach intensity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

STED Imaging of RD60-mGFP in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Stimulated emission depletion (STED) imaging of RD60-mGFP was carried out on a Leica SP8 inverted microscope fitted with a 100x objective of N.A. 1.4. The 592 nm STED laser was set at 60% power and the 488 nm white-light laser at 7% power with a gain of 45%. 10 z sections were taken over 1 μm with 16-line averages and a pixel size of 20 nm. Subsequently images were deconvolved using Huygens Professional. The compressed z stack of all 10 sections is shown in Figure S1E.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Whole-Gut Confocal Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confocal microscopy was performed using a Leica SP8 inverted microscope, producing two-channel images encompassing the CD45-positive and nuclei signals. Sequential acquisition began with the AlexaFluor647 channel followed by the DAPI channel. Exposure times were determined according to live observation of pixel intensities in order to avoid over-exposure of the tissue. Tiled acquisitions of whole-gut sections were performed using the automated tile function in the LAS-X software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescence Staining of Fixed Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PFA-fixed cells or explants were incubated with primary antibodies diluted in PBS/1% BSA IgG free/0.05% saponin. After overnight incubation at 4°C, cells were rinsed three times with 0.1% Tween-20 in PBS (PBST), and staining was revealed with an appropriate secondary antibody and/or phalloidin for 1 h, in the dark at room temperature. After three washes in PBST, cells were counterstained with DAPI for 10 min at room temperature. Finally, slides were mounted with Fluorescent Mounting Medium (#S3023, Dako) and stored at 4°C. Confocal microscopy images were obtained with a Leica SP8 inverted microscope equipped with Plan Apo x40/1.3 and x60/1.4 oil objectives and processed with ImageJ Version 1.52i (National Institutes of Health, https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/).
The primary antibodies used were: IFITM1 (#60074-1-Ig, Proteintech) 3 μg/ml, IFITM2/3 (#ab109429, Abcam) 1 μg/ml, HLAG (#MA1-19513, Invitrogen) 1 μg/ml, cytokeratin 7 (CK7, OV-TL 12/30, Dako) 1 μg/ml, FLAG-Tag DYKDDDDK (#F1804, Sigma-Aldrich) 1 μg/ml, and integrin-α5 (ITGA5/CD49e, #IM0770, Immunotech) 2 μg/ml. The secondary antibodies were Highly Cross-Adsorbed Goat anti-Mouse or anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) coupled with Alexa Fluor 488, 555, or 647 (Invitrogen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Microfluidic Thrombus Dynamics Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microfluidic flow chambers were prepared as previously described.13 Briefly, the chambers were coated with a solution of fibrillary Horm collagen (200 µg/mL) overnight at 4℃ and blocked with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) 10 mg/mL human serum albumin for 30 minutes at room temperature. Hirudinated (100 U/mL) whole blood from healthy human volunteers was perfused through the coated capillaries with a syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA, USA) at 37℃ and various flow rates. Thrombus stability was studied in real time by differential interference contrast microscopy (Leica DMI4000B; Leica Microsystem, Mannheim, Germany) using a 40×, 1.25 numerical aperture oil objective and a Hamamatsu CMOS ORCA FLASH‐4 LT camera (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan). For thrombus formation, whole blood was incubated with DIOC6 (1 µM) to label platelets. Fluorescence emission was measured in the range of 490 to 595 nm after excitation with a 488‐nm argon‐ion laser using a confocal Leica SP8 inverted microscope with a resonant scanner and a 40× oil objective. Series of optical sections in xyz were taken from the base to the peak of the thrombi (Leica LAS X software). Images were then stacked and the volume of the thrombi was determined with ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Super-resolution Fluorescence Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wide-field fluorescence images were obtained using the Cell^R system based on an Olympus IX81 fully motorized inverted microscope (×60 PlanApo objective, 1.42 NA) fitted with an Orca-AG CCD camera (Hamamatsu) driven by the Cell^R software. Super-resolution imaging was performed on a Leica SP8 inverted microscope equipped with a STED module, a pulsed white-light laser, and gating. The objective used was a STED dedicated ×100 1.4 NA, with Leica immersion oil, at room temperature. The mounting medium was homemade 80% glycerol with p-phenylenediamine antifade (Sigma), and the cover glasses were high-precision #1.5 (Thermo Scientific). Dual-color experiments were performed by between-line sequential imaging using the 660-nm depletion laser set at 90% (slider) of 90% laser power for FAM and 50% slider for 570 Quasar. This allowed for more accurate spatial imaging (as opposed to using the 592 nm depletion laser for Alexa Fluor 488, which would necessitate between-frame imaging). Gate settings were 0.3 ns for the Rhodamine Red-x and 2.5 ns for Alexa Fluor 488. Confocal images were acquired using the same microscope. The resulting images were deconvolved with Huygens Professional (Scientific Volume Imaging, Hilversum, The Netherlands) using the CMLE algorithm, with signal-to-noise ratios of 12 and 5 iterations, using the Huygens STED module.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Whole-Mount Immunostaining Confocal Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confocal images of tissues (whole-mount immunostaining) and cells represent maximum intensity projections of Z-stacks that were acquired using Leica SP8 inverted microscope with HCX PL APO CS 10 ×/0.40 DRY or HC PL APO CS2 63 ×/1.30 GLYC objectives and Leica LAS-X software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunofluorescent Staining of Organoids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protocol for immunofluorescent staining of organoids was adapted from that reported by Co et.al.(15 (link)). Working solutions of primary antibodies against ZO-1 and Reg3β (1:100) and secondary antibodies (donkey anti-rabbit 633 (1:1000) and goat anti-rat 568 (1:1000) from Molecular Probes, Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) were prepared in the blocking solution (5% Bovine Serum Album, 3% Normal Goat Serum, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.02% Tween 20 in 1X PBS). Images were acquired with Leica SP8 inverted microscope with a 40X objective (oil), zoom-1.0. Slides incubated without the primary antibody were used to correct for non-specific binding of the secondary antibodies. Positive staining for ZO-1 and Reg3β was quantitated by thresholding using ImageJ. The threshold cut-off was set using the control organoids and the signals from the treatment conditions were quantified using these threshold values. The acquired values were calculated over the DAPI signal for each organoid. 10–15 organoids were imaged per treatment condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!