The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Diff quick stain

Manufactured by Siemens

Diff-Quick stain is a commercial laboratory staining kit used to rapidly differentiate and identify cellular components in blood smear samples. It consists of three solutions that stain the nuclei, cytoplasm, and other cellular structures for microscopic examination.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using diff quick stain

1

Bronchoalveolar Lavage Inflammatory Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bronchoalveolar lavage (BALF) samples were collected by washing the lungs three times with 800 μL sterile PBS. The total volume of the combined fluids was measured and then centrifuged at 300 g for 5 minutes. The BALF supernatants were frozen for cytokine analysis. Red blood cells were lysed from the cell pellets, which were subsequently resuspended in 300 μL PBS. Cells were counted, and 100 000 cells were loaded into a cytospin funnel and centrifuged at 300 g for 5 minutes on to a glass slide. Slides were air‐dried, and the cells were stained using a Diff‐Quick stain (Siemens). The different inflammatory cell types were counted to a total of 300 cells and expressed as the differential cell count in cells/mL of BALF.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Antimalarial Drug Efficacy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After allowing the synchronized parasites to mature and reinvade fresh RBCs, ring stage infected cultures at 2% hematocrit (hct) (0.5–1% parasitemia) in CM were treated with the compounds provided by Eli Lilly described above. Healthy erythrocytes used for culturing and experimentation were collected from the same donor to reduce any possible donor-related variations. Analysis time points included 24 h after treatment to evaluate growth inhibition and 48 h after treatment to evaluate reinvasion efficiency. At the specified time points, aliquots of the desired culture were removed and stained with SYBR Green I DNA stain prior to analysis by flow cytometry to determine level of parasitemia (DNA abundance) per cell. Data was analyzed using Flow Jo. To assess parasitemia and infected cell morphology, thin smears were prepared, labeled with Diff-Quick stain (Siemens) and examined by light microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cytospin Cell Preparation and Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A glass slide and a single Cytofunnel were placed into a Cytoclip for each sample (Thermo Scientific Shandon). 3x104 cells were added in a volume of 100μL PBS to each funnel. Clips were placed in the Cytospin 2 (Thermo Scientific Shandon) and run at 1,000rpm for 5 minutes. Slides were removed and allowed to dry at room temperature. Diff Quick stain was used to stain slides (Siemens) prior to counting on a light microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Plasmodium falciparum Synchronization and Culture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After donation, blood was immediately processed as previously described [21 (link)]. Briefly, RBCs were separated from plasma and leukocytes by three washings in wash medium [RPMI 1640 (Invitrogen) containing 2 mM glutamine, 25 mM HEPES, 20 mM glucose, 27 μg/mL hypoxanthine and 32 μg/mL of gentamicin (Sigma) (pH 7.2)]; P. falciparum strain Palo Alto was then cultured at 1–5% hematocrit [33 (link)] under a 1% O2, 5% CO2, and 94% N2 atmosphere in complete media (CM) [wash medium supplemented with 0.5% Albumax II (Gibco)]. Parasites were synchronized using a Percoll gradient method, as previously described [24 (link)]. After allowing the synchronized parasites to mature and reinvade fresh RBCs, drug studies were performed at the desired times as hours post-invasion (hpi). To assess parasitemia and infected cell morphology, thin smears were prepared, labeled with Diff-Quick stain (Siemens), and examined by light microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nasal Airway Lavage in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nasal airway lavage (NAL) on mice and analysis of infiltrating inflammatory cells were performed using the trans-pharyngeal nasal lavaging technique developed by our laboratory [19] (link). Different from previously used trans-tracheal technique [27] (link), this technique minimizes cells loss and gives consistent cytology results [19] (link). Briefly, the choana was cannulated with 24G catheter through the pharyngeal opening above the vocal cord by transpharyngeal approach. The nasal cavities were gently lavaged with 350 µL of cold PBS twice and the fluid from the nostrils was collected. NAL fluids were centrifuged, and supernatants were stored at −80°C until assayed. Cell pellet was resuspended with 100 µL PBS and the total cells were counted using hemocytometer. Cytospin slides were prepared and stained with Diff-Quick stain (Dade Behring, Deerfield, Illinois), followed by differential cell count of at least 200 cells per slide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation and Characterization of Monocytes from Human Blood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ten milliliters of human peripheral blood from a healthy volunteer was centrifuged at 4°C, 1400 × g for 10 minutes to purify the buffy coat (leukocyte layer). The buffy coat was overlaid on OptiPrep™ (Alere Technologies AS, Oslo, Norway) density-gradient media that had been adjusted to a specific gravity of 1.077 g/cm3. This was centrifuged at 20°C, 800 × g for 20 minutes to separate the mononuclear cells. After washing twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), the mononuclear cells were incubated with anti-human CD14-FITC-labeled antibody and anti-human CD19-PE-labeled antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA) at 4°C for 20 minutes.
After washing, CD14+/CD19 cells were sorted by flow cytometry (FCM) using FACSVantage SE (BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA), and collected to recover purified monocytes (Kanai et al., 2007 (link)). Cell morphology of the sorted CD14+/CD19 cells was confirmed using Diff-Quick stain™ (Dade Behring, Inc., Deerfield, IL). All procedures were performed in compliance with the Recombinant DNA Experiment Safety Committee, Fujita Health University (DP16051).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

BAL Cell Differential Counting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BAL cells were washed once in saline and counted using a hemocytometer (Paul Marienfeld, LaudaKoenigshofen). Differential cell counts were obtained under light microscope after staining with Diff-Quick stain (Dade Behring, Deerfield, IL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!