The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

26 protocols using anti cd8a

1

OT-I CD8+ T Cell Cytotoxicity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
OT-I CD8+ T cells were co-cultured with either tumor cells or tumor expressing H-2Kb-OVA257-264 cells for 2 and 48 h. In the 2 h test, cells were co-cultured at the presence of anti-CD107a (Biolegend, 1D4B). After 2h, all cells were collected and stained with anti-CD8a (Biolegend) for degranulation analysis via flow cytometry (Cytoflex, Beckman). After 48 h, all cells were collected and stained with anti-CD8a, PI and Annexin V (Biolegend) for target cell apoptosis analysis via flow cytometry (Cytoflex, Beckman). All FCM data were analyzed by Flowjo 10.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Assessing APC Responses to Vaccine Formulations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
C57BL/6 mice were vaccinated in both inguinal regions subcutaneously with PBS, PE, PE + MnJ, or PE + aluminum. Inguinal dLNs were collected 12 or 24 h after immunization. dLN cells were labeled with DAPI and anti-CD11c (Biolegend, Cat# 117325), anti-F4/80 (Biolegend, Cat# 123115), anti-CD8a (Biolegend, Cat# 100721), and anti-CD64 antibodies (Biolegend, Cat# 139315) to identify APCs. The ratio of PE+ APCs (CD11c+ or F4/80+ cells) from dLN cells and the ratio of Mo-DCs (CD64+ CD8a+) in APCs (CD11c+ or F4/80+ cells) were analyzed by FACS.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Murine Bone Marrow Cell Isolation and Immunophenotyping

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bone marrow was isolated from tibia and femur of mice and erythrocytes were lysed. To sort pre-progenitor cells staining for linage markers anti-CD3e (Cat # 45-0031-80, eBioscience, 1:50), anti-GR1 (Cat # 108428, BioLegend, 1:400), anti-Mac-1 (Cat # 101228, BioLegend, 1:400), anti-CD4 (Cat # 101228, BioLegend, 1:200), anti-CD8a (Cat # 100734, BioLegend, 1:100), anti-TCRb (Cat # 109228, BioLegend, 1:100), anti-NK1.1 (Cat # 45-5941-82, eBioscience, 1:100), anti-B220 (Cat # 103236, BioLegend, 1:100) and anti-CD19 (Cat # 115534, BioLegend, 1:200) was performed. Additionally anti-CD16/32 (Cat # 101305, BioLegend, 1:200), anti-CD41 (Cat # 133906, BioLegend, 1:100), anti-Sca-1 (Cat # 108114, BioLegend, 1:200), anti-c-kit (Cat # 47-1171-82, Invitrogen, 1:50), anti-CD105 (Cat # 120412, BioLegend, 1:50) and anti-CD150 (Cat # 115910, BioLegend, 1:400) were stained to further classify cells. To sort immature granulocytes, mature granulocytes and monocytes anti-Ly6G/Ly6C (Cat # 17-5931-82, Invitrogen, 1:100), anti-CD11b (Cat # 25-0112-82, eBioscience, 1:100) and anti-CD115 (Cat # 11-1031-85, eBioscience, 1:100) were used. Gating strategy was performed as shown in Supplementary Fig 5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface staining of the single cell suspensions was performed for 30 min at 4°C, and viability was assessed using LIVE/DEAD Fixable viability dye as per the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
The following surface markers antibodies from Biolegend were used: anti-CD3 (clone: 145–2C11), anti-CD4 (RM4–5), anti-CD8a (53–5.8), anti-CD45 (30-F11), anti-CD11b (M1/70), anti-CD11c (N418), anti-CD19 (6D5), anti-TCRβ (H57–597), anti-NK1.1 (PK136), anti-KLRG1 (2F1), anti-PD-1 (29F.1A12), anti-CD25 (PC-61), anti-CD44 (IM7), anti-CD62L (MEL-14), anti-Thy1.1 (OX-7), anti-CCR2 (SA203G11), anti-CXCR3 (CXCR3–173), anti-CXCR5 (L138D7), anti-CXCR6 (SA051D1), anti-CD103 (2E7). Samples were then fixed overnight at 4°C using the using 100 μL of Foxp3 Fix/Perm buffer (eBioscience). After membrane permeabilization using 1X permeabilization buffer (eBioscience) for 5 min, intracellular staining was performed for 120 min at room temperature using the following antibodies: anti-Ctla-4 (UC10–4B9, Biolegend), anti-Helios (22F6, Biolegend), anti-Foxp3 (FJK16, Thermofisher), anti-Gata3 (TWAJ, Thermofisher), anti-RORγ (AFKJS-9, Thermofisher), anti-Ki-67 (16A8, Biolegend). Cells were acquired with an Aurora flow cytometer (Cytek Biosciences) or a FACSymphony flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed using FlowJo software version 10 (TreeStar, BD LifeSciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry for Apoptosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Surface and intracellular staining was performed directly ex vivo. Cells were Fc-blocked with anti-CD16/CD32 (1:100) and surface stained with anti-CD45.2-PercPCy5.5 (104, Biolegend #109828; 1:400), anti-NK1.1-FITC (PK136, Biolegend #108706; 1:400), and anti-CD8a (Biolegend #109807; 1:400). Cells were fixed in 2% PFA either overnight at 4°C or for 20 minutes on ice before permeabilizing with 10X Fix/Perm Buffer (Biolegend #421002) on ice. Cells were incubated with cleaved caspase-7 antibody (Cell Signaling #9491, 1:500, 45 minutes) followed by APC-conjugated secondary anti-rabbit antibody (Cell Signaling, #4414s, 1:1000, 45 minutes). After 5 washes, cells were stained with anti-CPS1-HRP antibody (Abcam #198969, 1:300, detailed description below, 45 minutes), and samples were analyzed on a FacsCalibur machine courtesy of Dr. Whitmire’s lab. Flow cytometry data was collected using BD CellQuest Pro v5.2.1 software and analyzed using FlowJo v10.3 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Analysis of Murine BALF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were collected from BALF and resuspended in a buffer containing 154 mM NH4Cl, 10 mM KHCO3, and 0.1 mM EDTA for red blood cell lysis for 5 minutes. After washing with PBS containing 2% FBS, cells were stained with anti-CD45.2 (Biolegend; 109808), anti–Siglec F (Invitrogen; 12-1702-82), anti–Gr-1 (BioLegend; 108412), anti-CD4 (Biolegend; 100516), anti-CD8a (Biolegend; 100708), anti-Mac-1 (CD11b) (Biolegend; 101208), anti-CD11c (Biolegend; 117307), anti-NK-1.1 (Ly-55) (Biolegend; 108707), anti-B220 (Biolegend; 103211), or anti-IgG2a (Biolegend; 407109) antibodies for 30 minutes on ice. To confirm the Th2 cell differentiation, cells were collected from BALF and fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde (PFA) and permeabilized with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and 0.2% bovine serum albumin for 3 minutes. The cells were then incubated with PE-conjugated anti-GATA3 (Invitrogen; 12-9966-42) and APC-conjugated anti-CD4 (Biolegend; 100516) antibodies for 1 hour. Flow cytometry analysis was performed using a Guava easyCyto flow cytometer (Merck Millipore).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of Peripheral Blood Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For quantification of peripheral blood cells, 50 µl of whole blood was collected. Red blood cells were lysated and Fc- blockage was performed (Fc-Block, Pharmingen). After washing cells were stained with anti-B220 (BD Pharmingen), anti-CD8a (BioLegend), anti-CD11b (BD-Pharmingen), anti-CD4, anti-CD115, anti-Nk1.1, and anti-Ly6c (all ThermoFisher Scientific). To collect absolute numbers, CountBright Absolute Counting Beads (ThermoFisher Scientific) were added. Samples were measured on a FACSCanto II (BD Bioscience, Franklin Lakes, USA) and analyzed with FlowJo (Tree Star, Ashland, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Different panels of antibody cocktails were generated from anti‐CD45 (BioLegend, 103116, 30‐F11), anti‐CD3 (BioLegend, 100218, 17A2), anti‐CD4 (BioLegend, 100421, GK1x.5), anti‐CD8a (BioLegend, 100711, 53‐6.7), anti‐NKp46 (BioLegend, 137606, 29A1.4), anti‐CD11c (BioLegend, 117307, N418), anti‐CD25 (Biolegend, 101908, 3C7), anti‐FOXP3 (Biolegend, 126404, MF‐14), anti‐granzyme B (BioLegend, 372208, QA16A02), anti‐IFNγ (BioLegend, 505849, XMG1.2), anti‐IFNγ (BioLegend, 505806, XMG1.2, anti‐CD62L (BioLegend, 104432, MEL‐14) and anti‐CD44 (BD Biosciences, 560568, IM7) antibodies, and the AmCyan Live/Dead Cell Staining Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). All antibodies were diluted at optimized dilutions before being used.
Female 7–8 weeks old C57BL/6 mice (n = 4–5 per group) were intravenously administered with the equivalent dose (3.8 × 1010 vg/mouse) of either free AAV‐fLuc or RBC‐AAV‐fLuc. Mice were then euthanized on day 31, and spleen and lungs were collected. Organ dissociation kits (Miltenyi Biotec) were used per manufacturer's instruction to generate a single‐cell suspension from excised organs, and cells were stained with the antibodies listed above and analyzed using flow cytometry (BD LSR II Analyser). Flow cytometry data analyses were performed using FlowJo 10 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Macrophage Phenotypes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LPS (O111:B4) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The following fluorescence-conjugated antibodies were provided from BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA) and were used for flow cytometry analysis: anti-F4/80 (BM8), anti-CD11b (M1/70), anit-CD206 (C068C2), anti-CD80 (16-10A1), anti-CD86 (GL-1), anti-MHC class II (M5/114.15.2), anti-CD3 (17A2), anti-CD4 (RM4-5), and anti-CD8a (53-6.7).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunophenotyping of Liver Mononuclear Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subsets of liver mononuclear cells were measured by flow cytometry. Before staining with a previously defined optimal dilution of monoclonal antibodies (Abs), the cells were pre-incubated with anti-CD16/32 (clone 93) to block non-specific FcRγ binding. The following Abs were used in this study: anti-CD69, anti-CD44, anti-CD3, anti-CD4, anti-CD8a, anti-CD19, (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), anti-NK1.1 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) and PE-conjugated mouse CD1d tetramers loaded with PBS57 (PBS57 loaded CD1d tetramer, originally produced by the NIH tetramer facility, and supplied through Dr. David Serreze). Stained cells were assessed on a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Inc., Ashland, OR, USA). Optimal concentrations of the mAbs were used throughout and all assays included positive and negative controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!