The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Genesys 10

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Germany, France, Switzerland, Finland

The Genesys 10S is a UV-Vis spectrophotometer designed for basic absorbance and concentration measurements. It features a wavelength range of 190-1100 nm and can accommodate various cuvette sizes. The instrument provides accurate and reliable data for a wide range of applications in academic and industrial laboratories.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

220 protocols using genesys 10

1

Monitoring Fe-Siderophore Complexation in Biofilms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Complexation of freshly precipitated Fe (10−5 M FeCl3) by bacillibactin (10−5 M) in water was monitored over time by UV-visible (UV-Vis) spectrometry (Genesys 10S; Thermo Scientific). Experiments on Fe complexation by a catechol siderophore in the presence of biofilm were performed at a high concentration of ligand (10−4 M) to overcome the spectral interferences of the biofilm matrix. Due to the limited commercial availability of bacillibactin, we used azotochelin, a biscatechol from Azotobacter vinelandii, as a model catechol siderophore. Azotochelin was synthetized as described previously (37 (link), 38 ). The B. subtilisdhbA-F mutant (deficient in siderophore production) was grown in the presence of 10−4 M FeCl3 and 10−5 M desferrioxamine E (DefE; Cedarlane, Burlington, Ontario, Canada) to obtain a catechol siderophore-free biofilm. After biofilm establishment (22 h after inoculation), 10−4 M azotochelin was added to the medium, and the formation of Fe-azotochelin complex was monitored by UV-Vis spectrometry (Genesys10s; Thermo Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Physicochemical Properties of Verjuice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The physicochemical properties were done as follows: the titratable acidity of verjuice was calculated as the percentage of tartaric acid since it is the most abundant organic acid in verjuice [14 , 15 (link)]. A pH/temperature microprocessor-based bench meter, equipped with digital probe 230 VAC, was used to measure the pH. A handheld refractometer (Model REF 107, 0-90% Brix) was used to measure the soluble solid content of verjuice [15 (link)]. Color intensity of all verjuice samples was measured spectrophotometrically (spectrophotometer, Thermo, model Genesys 10-S) based on the color intensity measurement of wine (I = (A at 420 nm) + (A at 520 nm), where I is the intensity and A is the absorbance) [16 ]. The Folin-Ciocalteu method for wines was adopted to find the total quantity of polyphenols in verjuice [17 (link)]. The antioxidant activity of the polyphenols found in verjuice was tested by the ability of these polyphenols to scavenge hydrogen peroxide [18 (link), 19 (link)]. Suspended solids were determined using Method 160.2 in Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes (USEPA, 1983). Moisture percentage was measured using a moisture analyzer (Redwag MA 210.R, 563610, Tmax 160°C). A UV-visible spectrophotometer (spectrophotometer, Thermo, model Genesys 10-S) was used for measuring the browning index [20 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Antioxidant Activities of Digested Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DPPH radical-scavenging activity was assessed following the method of Phongthai et al. [9 (link)]. The digested and non-digested proteins (1 mg/mL, 0.5 mL) were mixed with 0.1 mM DPPH (2 mL) and then incubated for 30 min (dark condition). Distilled water was used as a control. The absorbance was read at 517 nm (Genesys™ 10S, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The percentage of inhibition activity was calculated using the following equation:
where Abscontrol and Abssample are the absorbances of the control and sample, respectively.
The ABTS radical-scavenging activity was assessed as described in Phongthai et al. [9 (link)]. Potassium persulfate (2.6 mM) and 7.4 mM ABTS solutions were mixed (1:1) and incubated for 12 h. The working solution was prepared by diluting the stock solution in DI water at a ratio of 1:60. The digested and non-digested protein solution (150 µL) was mixed with 28.5 mL of the working solution and incubated for 2 h in the dark. The absorbance was measured at 734 nm (Genesys™ 10S, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The percentage of inhibition activity was calculated using the following equation:
where Abscontrol and Abssample are the absorbances of the control and sample, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Phenols and Flavonoids in Plant Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total phenolic content of plant extracts was measured exploiting the Folin–Ciocalteu (FC) reagent employing a calibration curve of gallic acid (GA) (0–250 µg/mL) using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Genesys 10S, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) [13 (link),40 (link),50 (link)].
The total flavonoid content of R. nigrum extract was determined employing AlCl3 colorimetric assay utilizing a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Genesys 10S, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) [42 (link),51 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Polyphenols in Pear Cultivars

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Peel and pulp for each pear cultivar/advanced selection (4 fruits) were freeze-dried and powdered using an analytical IKA® A11 (Teramo, Italy) basic mill. The extraction was carried out following the method described by Proteggente et al. [30 (link)]. For each biological replicate, three technical replicates were prepared.
TPH in pear extract was evaluated using Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, according to the method of Slinkard and Singleton [31 ]. Gallic acid was used as the standard and a calibration curve was calculated using standard solutions ranging from 10 to 200 mg of gallic acid per liter. A spectrophotometer, GenesysTM 10 (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA), was used as a detector and the assay was realized at 750 nm. The results were expressed as milligrams of gallic acid equivalent (GAE) per g of dry weight (DW).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Total Antioxidant Activity Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total antioxidant activity (TAA) was determined according to the method of Re et al. [32 (link)], based on the oxidation of ABTS by potassium persulfate to form a radical cation ABTS●+. Trolox® was used as standard. The calibration curve was calculated on the inhibition percentage of standard solutions ranging from 1.8 to 18 µM. A spectrophotometer, GenesysTM 10 (Thermo), was used as a detector and the detection was realized using a wavelength at 734 nm. The results were expressed as Trolox®equivalent (TE) per g of dry weight (DW).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Analysis of Photosynthetic Pigments and UV-Absorbing Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The content of Chl a and b and carotenoids was determined in 96% ethanol extracts [39 (link)] by analyzing the absorption spectra of the samples on a Genesys 10 UV spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at λmax of 470, 649, and 665 nm. The content of UVAPs was determined using fully developed, healthy-looking upper leaves (8–12), which were kept for 24 h in acid methanol (methanol/water/HCl, 78:20:2) at +4 °C [40 (link)]. The optical density of the samples was determined in the UV range (maximum at 327 nm) using a spectrophotometer (Genesys 10 UV, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The content of UVAPs was expressed in relative units per 100 mg of dry matter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Spectrophotometric Analysis of Beta-Carotene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Approximately 0.045 g of the centrifuged top‐phase sample was melted by heating it in a water bath at 55 °C. Then, the sample was dissolved in 10 mL of n‐hexane which is optically pure at 446 nm. Lastly, the sample was transferred to a quartz cuvette and the spectrophotometric absorbance at 446 nm was obtained using UV‐visible spectroscopy (Genesys 10; Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The beta‐carotene content was determined using Eqn (2) as shown: Carotene contentmgkg1=Volume of solventmL×383×Absorbance of sampleAbsorbance of purenhexane100×Sample massg where ‘383’ and ‘100’ in the equation were the simplification of the scaling factor and extinction factor of pure beta‐carotene.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

DOM Fluorescence Signatures Analysis by EEMs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DOM fluorescence signatures were analyzed by EEMs according to (D’Andrilli et al. 2013 (link)) on a Fluoromax-4 spectrofluorometer (HORIBA Jobin-Yvon). Samples were analyzed for UV-Vis absorbance (190-1100nm) with a ThermoScientific Genesys10 scanning spectrophotometer on optically dilute samples (absorbance < 0.3 at 254 nm). EEMs data were post-processed to correct for instrument-specific bias using manufacturer-generated correction files for excitation, emission, and media blank subtraction (carbon free M9 minimal media). For temporal samples, EEMs were normalized according to the fluorescent intensity normalization calculation in the DOMFluor Toolbox (Stedmon and Bro 2008 ). Specific regions of fluorescence were defined for each carbon source corresponding to previously identified natural OM fluorophores (Coble 1996 (link)). For statistical analysis of OM fluorescence, EEMs were decomposed into individual fluorescing components using parallel factor (PARAFAC) analysis) with decomposition routines for excitation emission matrices; drEEM, v. 0.3.0) and the N-way scripts in MATLAB R2016b (Murphy et al., 2013, Stedmon and Bro, 2008 ; see SI)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Antioxidant Capacity Determination via FRAP Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antioxidant capacity from the FRAP assay was determined as methodology previously described by Benzie and Strain [45 (link)] with modifications by Pulido, Bravo and Saura–Calixto [46 (link)]. The FRAP reagent was prepared by mixing acetate buffer (0.3 mol L−1, pH 3.6), TPTZ (10.0 mmol L−1) and FeCl3 (20.0 mmol L−1) solutions at the ratio 10:1:1, respectively. 100 μL of diluted sample extracts and 300 μL of distilled water were added to 3.0 mL of the FRAP reagent, which was kept in the dark for 30 min at 37°C. The absorbance was measured in comparison to a blank at 593 nm, using a spectrophotometer (Genesys 10, Thermo Scientific, Madison, USA). Aqueous solutions of known Fe (II) concentrations in the range of 0 to 1500 μmol L−1 (FeSO4.7H2O) were used for the calibration curve and the results were expressed as mmol Fe2+/kg DW.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!