The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

M2 epifluorescence microscope

Manufactured by Quorum Technologies
Sourced in Canada

The M2 epifluorescence microscope is a laboratory instrument designed for fluorescence imaging. It utilizes an illumination system to excite fluorescent samples, allowing for the visualization of specific cellular structures or molecules labeled with fluorescent dyes. The core function of the M2is to provide high-quality fluorescence microscopy capabilities for research and analysis purposes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using m2 epifluorescence microscope

1

Quantifying Retinal Ganglion Cell Survival

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After transcardiac perfusion with 4% PFA in PBS, the eyes were removed, post-fixed with 4% PFA for 2 h, at room temperature, and cryoprotected in 30% sucrose overnight. Retinas were dissected out and washed extensively in PBS before blocking in staining buffer (10% normal goat serum and 2% Triton X-100 in PBS) for 30 min. RBPMS guinea pig antibody was custom made by ProSci Inc (Poway, CA, USA) and used at 1:4,000 as described before (Zhang et al., 2019b (link)). Floating retinas were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C and washed three times for 30 min each with PBS. Secondary antibodies (Cy3) were then applied (1:200–400; Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA) and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Retinas were again washed three times for 30 min each with PBS before a coverslip was attached with Fluoromount-G (SouthernBiotech, Birmingham, Alabama). RGC were counted, 6–9 fields randomly sampled from peripheral regions of each retina using a 40× lens and a Zeiss M2 epifluorescence microscope, and RBPMS+ RGCs were counted by Volocity software (Quorum Technologies Inc., Puslinch, ON, Canada). The percentage of RGC survival was calculated as the ratio of surviving RGC numbers in injured eyes compared to contralateral uninjured eyes. The investigators who counted the cells were blinded to the treatment of the samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

RGC Quantification in Optic Nerve Injury

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The detailed procedures have been published before.45 (link),46 (link),47 (link),48 (link),71 (link),73 (link) For peripheral RGC counting in the ON crush model, whole-mount retinas were immunostained with the RBPMS antibody, eight fields were sampled from peripheral regions of each retina using a 40× lens with a Zeiss M2 epifluorescence microscope, and RBPMS-positive RGCs were counted by Volocity software (Quorum Technologies). For whole-retina RGC counting in the SOHU glaucoma model, the entire retina was imaged with the 20× objective lens of a Keyence fluorescence microscope (Figure S2A). Eight circles drawn by Concentric Circle plugin of NIH ImageJ were used to define the peripheral, middle, and inner areas of the retina. Multiple 100 × 100 μm counting frames were applied automatically by AxonCounter plugin of ImageJ to sample about 10% of each retina. The number of surviving RGCs in the sampled areas was manually counted by Cell Counter plugin of ImageJ. The percentage of RGC survival was calculated as the ratio of surviving RGC numbers in injured eyes compared to contralateral uninjured eyes. The investigators who counted the cells were masked to the treatment of the samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Retinal Ganglion Cell Survival

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole-mount retinas were immunostained with the RBPMS antibody, 6–8 fields randomly sampled from peripheral regions of each retina using a 40X lens with a Zeiss M2 epifluorescence microscope, and RBPMS + RGCs counted by Volocity software (Quorum Technologies). The percentage of RGC survival was calculated as the ratio of surviving RGC numbers in injured eyes compared to contralateral uninjured eyes. The investigators who counted the cells were masked to the treatment of the samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!