The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

31 protocols using dmra2

1

Comprehensive Analytical Instrumentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The apparatus are as follows: Equinox55 Fourier transform infrared absorption spectrometer (Germany); magnetic resonance apparatus (Varian Bruker-600mhz); laser confocal microscope (LSM 880 with AiryScan, Carl Zeiss, Germany); inverted fluorescence microscope (Leica DMRA2, Germany); microplate reader (Gen5, BioTek, the US); flow cytometry (FACS Canto, BD, the US); optical microscopy (OLYMPUS, CKX41, Japan); Thermo ICS5000 ion chromatographic system (ICS5000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Imaging and Quantifying Wing Disc Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For S7 Fig, wing imaginal discs were dissected from 3rd instar larvae and labeled with antibodies against DsRed (Takara) followed by labelling with anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor 568 (Thermo Fisher). Cells were stained with DAPI (0.5μg/ml) and imaged on a Leica SP5 confocal or Leica DMRA2 fluorescent microscope. Nuclear area and DAPI fluorescence was measured with ImageJ. Nuclear area and DAPI fluorescence of GAL4-expressing, DsRed-positive cells within the wing pouch was normalized to that of DsRed-negative cells in the wing pouch of the same discs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

HAP Crystal-Induced Oxidative Stress

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following the cell incubations described as above, the cells were exposed to 200 μg/mL HAP crystals with various shapes for 24 h, the samples were stained with DCFH-DA for 20 min. The cells were then observed under a fluorescence microscope (Leica DMRA2, Germany). The fluorescence intensity was detected by using a microplate reader20 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Acridine Orange Staining for Lysosome Integrity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The DC2.4 cells were seeded in 24‐well plates (5 × 104 cells/well) and incubated for 24 h. Next, the cells were stained for 1 h with 5 μg/ml acridine orange dye solution. After removing the dye, the cells were cultured for 24 h with PBS, OVA, Fe3O4@Ca/MnCO3 + OVA, Fe3O4@Ca/MnCO3/OVA, Fe3O4@Ca/MnCO3/OVA(M), or Alum/OVA formulations. The distribution of acridine orange in the cells was observed with a fluorescence microscope (DMRA2, Leica, Germany).
The DC2.4 cells were seeded in 96‐well black plates (1 × 104 cells/well) and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. The treatment of acridine orange staining was as same as the above steps. Then, the red (620 nm) and green (485 nm) fluorescence intensities of the cells were detected with a multifunctional microplate reader (Cytation5, Biotek, USA). Lysosome integrity of the treated cells (%) = (red/green fluorescence intensity of the treated cells)/(red/green fluorescence intensity of the control cells) × 100%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

DJ-1 Regulation by PRAK in H2O2 Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NIH3T3 cells were cotransfected with pcDNA-HA-PRAK, pcDNA3-Flag-DJ-1, and PEGFP-DJ-1 for 24 hrs. PRAK+/+ cells and PRAK−/− cells were starved for 48 hrs and were further challenged with H2O2 (300 μM) for 6 hrs. Cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, washed twice with PBS, and permeabilized with 0.1% sodium tetrahydroborate for 5 min. After being washed three times with PBST (PBS + 0.2%Triton X-100) and blocked with 3% BSA for 1 hr, cells were incubated with the indicated antibodies diluted in 3% BSA at room temperature for 1 hr and washed three times with PBST. Cells were further incubated with the indicated secondary antibodies diluted in 3% BSA at room temperature for 1 hr and washed three times with PBST. Cell nucleus was stained with 10 μM DAPI. Fluorescent images were recorded and analyzed using a fluorescence microscope (DMRA2, Leica) equipped with FW4000 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Yeast Sporulation and Tetrad Dissection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cultures were grown in Yeast Peptone Dextrose Adenine (YPDA: 2% (w/v) peptone, 1% (w/v) yeast extract, 2% (w/v) glucose, 100 µg/ml Adenine; to make snu114∆/snu114∆ diploid shuffle strain) or drop out media (to select for plasmids) overnight to stationary phase. 20 ml YPA (pre-sporulation medium, 2% (w/v) peptone, 1% (w/v) yeast extract, 1% (w/v) potassium acetate) cultures were inoculated in 100 ml flask to OD600 0.10–0.15 and grown with good aeration for 13–14 hours. Cultures with OD600 between 1.6–3.0 were harvested and washed with H2O, re-suspended in 10 ml SPM (Sporulation medium, 1% (w/v) potassium acetate, 0.002% (w/v) raffinose) to an OD600 of 1.8–1.9 and incubated at 30ºC shaking vigorously (250 rpm). After 4 hours in SPM, 100 µl of cells were removed every hour and fixed with 400 µl of 95% ethanol. Cell pellets were then stored at 4°C. Tetrads were stained with DAPI and monitored using microscope (Leica DMRA2). For RNA extraction, volumes were scaled up. For tetrad dissection 75 µl cell culture in sporulation medium with an OD600 of 2.0, was pelleted and resuspended in 18 µl of 1 M sorbitol, and Zymolyase was added to 1 mg/ml Following incubation for 10 min at 20°C, 400 µl of ice cold water was added and stored on ice until required. Tetrads were dissected using Micromanipulator (Singer Instruments MSM System).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multimodal Characterization of Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following apparatuses were used: XL-30 environmental scanning electron microscope (SEM, Philips, Eindhoven, Netherlands), Fourier transform infrared absorption spectrometer (EQUINOX 55, Bruker, Germany), D/max2400X X-ray powder diffractometer (Rigaku, Japan), Nano-ZS type nano particle size analyzer (Malvern, UK), Tristar 3000 specific surface area and porosity analyzer (Micromeritics, USA); microplate reader (Thermo Multiskan MK3, USA), inverted fluorescence microscope (Leica DMRA2, Germany), optical microscope (OLYMPUS, CKX41, Japan), flow cytometry (Beckman, Gallios, USA), and confocal microscope (LSM510 Meta Duo Scan, Zeiss, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Fluorescence Microscopy of Drosophila RNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All images were acquired with a Leica DMRA2 fluorescence microscope using a Q-Imaging Retiga EX camera and Openlab 3.1.7 software. All images were “pseudocolored” in Adobe Photoshop with optimal colors for general viewing, with DAPI in magenta and RNA in green. All data are publicly available in Fly-FISH (http://fly-fish.ccbr.utoronto.ca).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Apoptosis Visualization in Drosophila Larvae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mid-late 3rd instar larvae were dissected in either 1× PBS or Grace's solution, and fixed in 6% formaldehyde as previously described [98] (link), and immunolabeled using anti-cleaved-Caspase-3, 1∶50 (Cell Signaling). Secondary antibody was anti-rabbit 488 at 1∶500 dilutions, and DNA was counterstained with DAPI. X-gal staining was performed 6 hours after heat shock treatment as previously described [19] (link). TUNEL staining (In Situ cell death detection kit, TMR red, Roche) was performed according to manufacture's instructions. Wide-field micrographs were taken on a Leica DMRA2 and analyzed using OpenLab (Improvision) software. Confocal micrographs were captured on a Leica SP5 confocal.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Estimating Total Cells and Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To estimate total cells and neuron numbers from the dissected brain parts, we followed the isotropic fractioned method66 (link). The method consisted of dissociating brain tissue using a tissue grinder. To facilitate dissolving brain cell membranes while simultaneously ensuring that nuclear membranes remain intact, we ground the tissue in a saline detergent solution. Upon tissue homogenisation, samples were stained with diamino-phenyl-indol (DAPI). In a first step, cell counts were performed for every brain part with a haemocytometer (Brand® counting chamber Blaubrand® Neubauer improved) under a microscope with fluorescence (Leica DMRA2) using a ×40 dry lens (0.75 numerical aperture). The second step should have been to run an immunocytochemical protocol to identify the neurons using a neuronal protein marker (anti-NeuN rabbit Antibody, ABN78, dilution 1:100; Merck). However, due to fungal contamination of the samples during storage, it was not possible to run the second step of the technique to estimate neuronal numbers, and we only obtained reliable numbers on total cell numbers. All cell counts were done blindly regarding the identity of the samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!