The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using exoab hsp70a 1

1

Exosomal Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Exosomes lysed with M-PER (10 μg) were separated through SDS-PAGE, then transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, United States). After blocking with bullet blocking one (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan), the membranes were incubated with rabbit polyclonal anti-AKR1B1 (1:500, sc-33219, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, United States), goat polyclonal anti-CAPG (1:100, sc-33084, Santa Cruz Biotechnology), rabbit polyclonal anti-HSP70 antibody (1:2,000, EXOAB-HSP70A-1, System Biosciences), rabbit polyclonal anti-CD63 (1:1,000, EXOAB-CD63A-1, System Biosciences), or rabbit polyclonal anti-RAB5 (ab13253, 1:1,000, Abcam, Tokyo, Japan). Immunoreactive bands were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (EMD Millipore, Temecula, CA, United States) after incubation with horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG or horse anti-goat IgG (1:5,000, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, United States). Signals were detected using C-DiGit Blot Scanner (LI-COR; Kusama et al., 2018a (link)). Total proteins were stained with colloidal gold total protein stain solution according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Extracellular Vesicle Protein Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EV marker and immuno-related proteins in lysates from EVs and EECs were detected through the use of SDS-PAGE. Separated proteins transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) were blocked with Block Ace reagent (DS Pharma Biomedical, Osaka, Japan), and the membranes were incubated with the following antibodies; rabbit polyclonal anti-human CD63 antibody (1:2000, EXOAB-CD63A-1, System Biosciences), rabbit polyclonal anti-human HSP70 antibody (1:2000, EXOAB- HSP70A-1, System Biosciences), rabbit polyclonal anti-bovine CTSC (1:2000, ab182904, abcam, Tokyo, Japan), rabbit polyclonal anti-pocine IL6 (1:2000, ab193853, abcam), or rabbit polyclonal anti-human ACTB (1:5000, ab1801, abcam). The membranes were then incubated with secondary antibody, horseradish peroxidase labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (1:5000, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA), and immunoreactive bands were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (EMD Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA). Signals were detected using C-DiGit Blot Scanner (LI-COR) and then band density was assessed with Image Studio DiGit software (version 5.2)37 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Exosome Protein Profiling by Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells and exosomes were lysed in ice-cold cell lysis buffer containing 50 mM Tris/HCl (PH7.5), 2 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 1 % (v/v) Triton X-100, complete™ proteinase and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche), as described previously [5 (link)]. Lysates were loaded and subjected to SDS–polyacrylamide (4–20 %) electrophoresis and electroblotted onto PVDF membranes. After blocking in 5 % non-fat dry milk, membranes were incubated with mouse anti-polyglutamine (1C2, Cat. No. MAB1574, Millipore), mouse anti-total huntingtin (4C8, Cat. No. MAB2166, Millipore) and mouse anti-mutant huntingtin (EM48; 1:1000) antibodies. Exosomes were identified with the antibodies raised against CD9 (1:1000, Cat. No. EXOAB-CD9A-1, Systems Biosciences), CD63 (1:1000, Cat. No. EXOAB-CD63A-1, Systems Biosciences), CD81 (1:1000, Cat. No. EXOAB-CD81A-1, Systems Biosciences) and HSP70 (1:1000, Cat. No. EXOAB-Hsp70A-1, Systems Biosciences). Membranes were incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody (goat anti-mouse or anti-rabbit) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, followed by the addition of the chemiluminescent detection reagent (Millipore). Bands were visualized using a ChemiDoc™ XRS + system (Bio-Rad) and quantified using the image lab software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Exosome-mediated Regulation of MSC Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MSCs were plated in six-well plates at a density of 2 × 105 cells/well for 24 h and treated with exosomes at a concentration of 200 µg for 48 h. After removing the medium, cells were lysed in a buffer (P0013 and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), Beyotime Institute of Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) for 30 min at 4°C. Exosome sample preparation was similar as before. The supernatant was harvested by centrifuging at 12,000 g for 5 min at 4°C. A bicinchoninic acid (BCA) kit was used to measure protein concentrations. The proteins were separated by 10% sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h, detected for anti-HSP70 (EXOAB-Hsp70A-1, System Biosciences, USA), anti-CD63 (EXOAB-CD63A-1, System Biosciences, USA), anti-TSG101 (28283-1-AP, Proteintech, USA), anti-IGFBP2 (11065-3-AP, Proteintech, USA), anti-IGF-2 (ab177467, Abcam, UK), anti-IGF-1R (9750T, Cell Signaling Technology, USA), and anti-p-IGF-1R (Tyr1135, 3918T, Cell Signaling Technology, USA) at 4°C overnight, and then incubated with anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (SA00001-2, Proteintech, USA) for 1 h at room temperature. The Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) was used to scan and analyze the images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Extracellular Vesicle Protein Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For protein extraction, EV-pellets (obtained after ultracentrifugation of a pool of four plasma samples, total 6 ml) were resuspended in 100 μl lysis buffer containing 300 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris pH 7.4, 0.5% NP-40 and anti-proteases cocktail (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA). Protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), and 15 μg total protein was submitted to sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Ponceau staining was performed before blocking with 5% milk. Primary commercially available antibodies used were CD63 1:1,000 (CBL553, Millipore, Billerica, MA, United States), RAB27B 1:250 (HPA019849, Sigma-Aldrich), Flotillin 1:500 (ab41927, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), HSP70 1:1,000 (EXOAB-Hsp70A-1, System Biosciences, Mountain View, CA, USA), TSG101 1:500 (ab4A10, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and RAB7A 1:1,000 (ab50533, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Extracellular Vesicle Isolation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EVs were concentrated from fraction 2 using ultracentrifugation at 110K g for 90 min, supernatants were aspirated, and EV pellets were resuspended in radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) lysis buffer (89901; Thermo Fisher Scientific) with protease inhibitor cocktail (78415; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Protein quantification was performed using the Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay (23225 and 23227; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Mini-Protean®TGC™ wells were loaded with 5 μg of EV protein in Laemmli Sample Buffer (1610747; Bio Rad) or 10 μL of the Precision Plus Protein Kaleidoscope prestained standards (1610375; BioRad).
Gel electrophoresis was run, samples and standards were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane, and the membrane was labeled for heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) or tumor susceptibility gene 101 (TSG101) (EXOAB-Hsp70A-1 and EXOAB-TSG101–1, System Biosciences). Appropriate secondary antibody was applied and stained using SuperSignal™ West Pico Plus Chemiluminescent Substrate (34580; Thermo Fisher Scientific). Images were taken with ChemiDoc™ XRS+ with Image Lab™ Software (BioRad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Exosome Protein Characterization by Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed in TNE buffer (50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4). 100 mM NaCl. 0.1 mM EDTA) and total cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to PVDF membranes, immunoblotted with antibodies and visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The antibodies used for immunoblotting were an anti-CD9 (EXOAB-CD9A-1), an anti-CD63 (EXOAB-CD63A-1), an anti-CD81 (EXOAB-CD81A-1), and an anti-HSP70 (EXOAB-HSP70A-1) from System Biosciences (Palo Alto, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!