The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Histamine

Manufactured by Nacalai Tesque
Sourced in Japan

Histamine is a chemical compound used in various laboratory applications. It is a key mediator in the body's inflammatory response and plays a role in a range of physiological processes. As a laboratory reagent, histamine can be used for research and analysis purposes, but its specific applications and intended uses should not be extrapolated beyond a factual description of the product.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using histamine

1

Daphnia Spinning Behavior Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The assay consisted of one individual placed in a cuvette (10 mm × 10 mm × 45 mm) with four transparent sides to maintain similar light intensity from all sides of the cells. Each of the cuvettes contained 3 ml of ADaM medium. This system was exposed to LED light from above with a light intensity of approximately 950-1,000 lx.
After the acclimatization for 1 hr, the spinning behavior of daphniids was quantified by calculating the number of 360 spins during a 10-min period. The data is presented as the spin rate, defined as the number of spins in 1 min. The spin rate of daphniids was recorded on Day 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 14, and 21 to evaluate the change of the spin rate during maturation. The spinning behavior assays were conducted in the absence of histamine and in the presence of 0.25, 0.5, or 1 mM histamine (Nacalai Tesque Inc., Kyoto, Japan) in ADaM medium.
Changes in the behavior in response to histamine solution were assessed in individual daphnia.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Endothelial Barrier Regulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The upper inserts (5.0 μm pore size) of Chemotaxicells (Kurabo Industries, Ltd) were coated with 100 μg fibronectin (Sigma-Aldrich). HUVECs were seeded on the insert and cultured for 48 h to form an endothelial monolayer. Subsequently, U937 cells (100,000 cells/100 μl culture media) were added on the monolayer and cultured for 6 h with Peptide 2, control peptide, or histamine (Nacalai Tesque) added in the lower wells. The number of U937 cells that migrated into the lower wells was counted using the Counting chamber (ERMA Inc).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Neurotransmitter Stock Solution Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dopamine (DA) hydrochloride (1 M stock, H8602, Sigma-Aldrich), serotonin hydrochloride (50 mM stock, 14332, CAY), and L-adrenaline (epinephrine) (5 mM stock, A0173, TCI) were dissolved in 10 mM HCl. L-noradrenaline bitartrate monohydrate (1 M stock, A0906, TCI), sodium L-glutamate monohydrate (10 mM stock, G0188, TCI), 4-aminobutyric acid (100 mM stock, A0282, TCI), histamine (100 mM stock, 18111–71, Nacalai Tesque), acetylcholine chloride (10 mM stock, A6625, Sigma-Aldrich), R( +)-SCH 23390 hydrochloride (10 mM stock, D054, Sigma-Aldrich), and octopamine hydrochloride (10 mM stock, O0413, TCI) were each dissolved separately in distilled water. SKF 81297 hydrobromide (10 mM stock, 1447, TOCRIS), haloperidol hydrochloride (20 mM stock, 0931, TOCRIS), yohimbine hydrochloride (20 mM stock, 1127, TOCRIS), and tyramine (10 mM stock, A0302, TCI) were dissolved in DMSO. Compound solutions were then subdivided into aliquots and stored at − 20 °C until use. A working solution of 1 M DA was stored at 4 °C for 3 weeks prior to use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Histamine-induced HMGB1 Localization in EA.hy926 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EA.hy 926 cells were pretreated with FBS-free medium for 1 h before being stimulated with different concentrations of histamine (Nakalai Tesque) for the indicated periods. The cells were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Wako Pure Chemical Industry, Osaka, Japan) and blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA), after which the cells were stained by anti-HMGB1 Ab (rabbit, Sigma, RRID:AB_444360) for 1 h at 37°C followed by Alexa Fluor 488-labeled anti-rabbit/mouse IgG. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI for 5 min, and then observed using a confocal microscope (LSM 780, Carl Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nasal Hypersensitivity Response in Th9-Transferred Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polarized Th9 cells (2 × 107) were intravenously injected in each BALB/c mouse on day 0. From 6 hours after the cell transfer, these mice were challenged with intranasal administration of 20-μL OVA (30 mg/mL; Sigma, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) or phosphate buffered saline (PBS) once a day on days 0–3 (Fig. 1). NHR was assessed 6 hours after the last challenge by counting the number of sneezes for 5 minutes just after the administration of 10-μL histamine (100 mM; Nacalai tesque, Kyoto, Japan) [3 (link)]. Inflammatory cells in the nasal lavage fluid were classified by means of morphological criteria as described previously [3 (link)]. The number of transferred Th9 cells in nasal-associated lymphoid tissue (NALT) were determined by flow cytometry upon staining with anti-CD4-APC-Cy7 (BioLegend) and anti-DO11.10 T-cell receptor (TCR)-FITC (eBioscience). This procedure did not induce any inflammatory responses in the lower airways [10 (link)]. In some experiments, 10-mg/kg dexamethasone (Dex: Tokyo Kasei, Tokyo, Japan) suspended in PBS containing 0.5% Tween-20 (Sigma) was subcutaneously injected in mice 30 minutes before each OVA challenge.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Allergen-Induced Nasal Hyperreactivity in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the allergen-immunized model, mice were sensitized by an intraperitoneal injection of 20 μg OVA (Sigma-Aldrich) emulsified with 2.25-mg alum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) on days 0, 7, 14, and 21 of the experiment. Each day on days 35–39 and 42–46, mice were exposed to ETS, and 30 minutes later, they were challenged with an intranasal (i.n.) administration of 600-μg OVA dissolved in 20-μL saline or saline alone (Fig. 1A). In the Th2 cell transfer model, polarized Th2 cells (2 × 107) were intravenously injected in each BALB/c mouse on day 0, and these mice were exposed to ETS and challenged with OVA or saline each day on days 1–5 and 8–12 (Fig. 1B). In these models, NHR was assessed 6 hours after the last challenge by counting the number of sneezes for 5 minutes just after the administration of 10-μL histamine (100 mM; Nacalai tesque, Kyoto, Japan) [14 (link)]. Inflammatory cells in the nasal lavage fluid were classified by means of morphological criteria as described previously [20 (link)]. These models did not exhibit any inflammatory features in the lower airways [21 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!