The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

20 protocols using sorvall lynx 4000

1

Urine Sample Preparation for Proteomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All samples were collected as a midstream portion of the second morning urine (~60 mL); samples were transferred on ice to the lab and processed according to Thomas et al. [5 (link)] with slight modifications. Briefly, 45 mL of each urine sample was transferred to a 50 mL conical tube and centrifuged at 1500× g for 12 min (Sorvall Lynx 4000, Thermo Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) to pellet cells. Fifteen milliliters of supernatant was then spun at 10,000× g for 12 min and supernatants were transferred to new tubes. Ten milliliters of urine sample of five individuals per group were pooled in a 50 mL conical tube, aliquoted and stored at −40 °C until analysis.
Human urine sample from one healthy donor was selected for FCSNP test (proof of concept) using single and two-dimensional sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D SDS-PAGE). Additionally, pooled urine from each group of individuals (as indicated before) were selected for MS analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

QuEChERS Extraction of Food Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sample was homogenized using a grinder (T 25 digital ULTRA-TURRAX®, IKA, Staufen, Germany). After weighing 10 g of the sample, 10 mL of acetonitrile was added to each weighed sample and shaken for 1 min. Thereafter, a QuEChERS extraction kit (magnesium sulfate: 98.5–101.5%; sodium chloride: ≥99.5%; sodium citrate: 99.9%; disodium citrate sesquihydrate: 99%) was added to the sample solution, followed by vigorous shaking for 1 min using a rotary mixer (DE/VIVA, Collomix GmbH, Gaimersheim, Germany). Subsequently, centrifugation was performed for 10 min at 4000 rpm using SORVALL LYNX 4000 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Then, 1 mL of the supernatant was put into the QuEChERS dispersive SPE kit (primary secondary amine, octadecyl silane end-capped, magnesium sulfate; 98.5–101.5%), mixed with Mixmate 5353 (Effendorf, Hamburg, Germany) for 1 min, and centrifuged again with Minispin plus 545 (Effendorf, Hamburg, Germany) at 10,000 rpm for 1 min. The liquid separated through this process was filtered with a 0.2 μm PTFE syringe filter (Whatman, Maidstone, UK) and was used as the final sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chitin Nanocrystals Preparation by Acid Hydrolysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChNC were prepared by acid hydrolysis of crude chitin powder in 3 M hydrochloric acid (HCl) at 80 °C for 90 min under magnetic stirring. The hot mixture was cooled on ice to stop the reaction. The HCl was removed by centrifuging the samples at 4500× g for 5 min (Sorvall Lynx 4000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), after which the supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was redispersed in an equal amount of MilliQ. This step was repeated three times. Subsequently, a 30 mL sample was added to a 50 mL reaction tube, and a sonification step was applied (5000 J energy input with an SFX150, Branson Ultrasonics, Brookfield, CT, USA) to increase chitin nanocrystal yield. Samples were diluted 10 times and centrifuged at 1200× g for 20 min. The supernatant containing the chitin nanocrystals was collected, and the pellet containing the amorphous chitin was discarded. A final centrifugation step was applied at 4500× g for 5 min to concentrate the chitin nanocrystal solution. The chitin nanocrystals were freeze dried before further usage (Christ Epsilon 2-6D, Martin Christ Gefriertrocknungsanlagen GmbH, Osterode am Harz, Germany). For this, samples were frozen at −40 °C for 12 h. The freeze-drying process was performed under a 1030 mbar vacuum. The temperature was increased from −20 °C to +20 °C in 8 stages during the freeze-drying process, which lasted for a total of 48 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cell Culture and Conditioned Medium Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BM-MSCs, adipose tissue-derived MSCs (AT-MSCs) and T-MSCs were cultured in low-glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM; Welgene) in 100-mm cell culture plates. The BM-MSCs were purchased from the Severance Hospital Cell Therapy Center and the AT-MSCs were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC). In the present study the T-MSCs were obtained previously (IRB File no. EUMC 2018-01-011-002) and maintained from the same patients as previously described (23 (link)). To prepare for cell injection, cells were collected at 80% confluence with trypsin treatment followed by 3 washes with PBS. Prior to injection with BM cells (BMCs) into the mice, MSCs were resuspended with low-glucose DMEM at a final volume of 200 µl for tail vein injection. To generate conditioned medium (CM) to analyze cellular soluble factors, cells at 80% confluence were washed four times with PBS, and the medium was replaced with serum-free DMEM. The medium was collected after 48 h of culture as previously described (19 (link)), centrifuged at 190 × g for 5 min at 25°C, passed through a 0.2-µm filter (Merck Millipore), and concentrated 20-fold by high-speed centrifugal filtration (Sorvall LYNX4000, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). The concentrated CM was then frozen and stored at -80°C for future use. As a negative control, serum-free culture medium was processed using the same method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Analysis of Monosaccharides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were centrifuged using a Sorvall Lynx 4000 refrigerated centrifuge (Thermo Scientific, Barcelona, Spain). pH measurements were performed with a sensION 3 pH meter (Hach Lange GmbH Headquarter, Düsseldorf, Germany). Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) was performed using an Agilent Technologies 7890A (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) chromatograph with a Chemstation Agilent software data-processing software, equipped with a 7653B automatic injector coupled to a 5975C VL quadrupole mass detector (MS). The different monosaccharides were quantified in selected ion monitoring (SIM) mode, selecting the appropriate number of ions for each compound (m/z). D-galacturonic acid, L-rhamnose, L-fucose, D-galactose, D-glucose, D-mannose and D-xylose with 204 ion; and D-glucuronic acid, L-arabinose, Kdo, 2-O-methyl-L-fucose, Dha and aceric acid with 217 ion; 2-O-methyl D-xylose with 146 ion; apiose with 191 ion; and myo-inositol (internal standard) with 305 ion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Extracting and Quantifying Myofibrillar Proteins in Shrimp Muscle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MP in shrimp muscle was extracted using Tris–maleate buffer solution, according to the method of Zhang et al. (11 (link)). Briefly, mashed shrimp muscle was homogenized (JXFSTPRP-12, Shanghai Jingxin Industrial Development Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) in the extraction buffer (composed of 0.10 mol/L NaCl and 20 mmol/L Tris-maleate; pH 7.0). After centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 15 min [Sorvall LYNX 4000, Thermo Fisher (shanghai) Scientific, Shanghai, China], the obtained precipitate was collected, resuspended in the same buffer, and extracted again. The resulting precipitate was dissolved in Tris–maleate buffer (composed of 20 mmol/L Tris-maleate and 0.60 mol/L NaCl; pH 7.0). MP content in the solution was determined using a bicinchoninic acid assay kit according to the instructions.
MP extractions (1.0–2.0 mg/mL proteins) were combined with 0.6 mol/L KCl solution. Ca2+-ATPase activity (μmol Pi/mg/min) in the obtained mixture was determined via an ultratrace Ca2+-ATPase activity assay kit, according to the manufacturer's instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Pyoverdine Extraction from Bacterial Culture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pyoverdines or precursors were extracted based on the method by Meyer et al. (37 (link)). Briefly, 1 ml of an overnight culture (in CAA medium) was used to inoculate 1 l CAA medium. The culture was grown for 72 h (30 °C, 180 rpm), cells were sedimented (30′, 20,000g, 4 °C; Sorvall Lynx 4000 centrifuge; Thermo Fisher Scientific), and the supernatant was sterile filtered (0.2 μm pore size) using the Filtropur V50 system (Sarstedt, Inc). The pH was adjusted to 6.0 using 8 M HCl, and 20 g/l XAD-4 resin was added. After 3 h incubation at 4 °C, the resin was filtered, the flow through was discarded, and the resin was resuspended in 0.5 l H2O. After another incubation for 1 h at 4 °C, the resin was filtered, resuspended in 200 ml 15% methanol, incubated for 15 min at 4°, and filtered again. Then, the resin was resuspended in 150 ml 50% methanol, incubated for 1 h at 4°, and filtered. The solvent was removed using a rotary evaporator, kept at 30 °C (Rotavapor R-124), and the pyoverdine or its biosynthetic intermediates were resuspended in 1 ml H2O and filtered (Filtropur S filter; Sarstedt, Inc).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Akkermansia muciniphila Strain Cultivation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Akkermansia muciniphila DSM 22,959 strain was obtained from Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures (Braunschweig, Germany). For long-term storage, this bacterial strain was kept frozen at −80 °C in PYG broth supplemented with 0.05% (m/v) mucin (PYGM, media composition as recommended by DSMZ [37 ] except that no resazurin was added), with 20% (v/v) glycerol (Fisher Chemical, Loughborough, UK). For each experiment, a frozen vial of A. muciniphila DSM 22,959 was thawed and grown in PYGM broth for 24 h at 37 °C, under anaerobic conditions (85% N2, 5% H2 and 10% CO2—Whitley A35 HEPA anaerobic workstation, Bingley, UK). After incubation, the bacterial suspension was subcultured twice in PYGM broth to ensure high bacterial concentration. Cell biomass was harvested by centrifugation (Sorvall LYNX 4000, Thermo Scientific, MA, USA) at 12,000× g, for 30 min, at 4 °C and washed once with the same volume of sterile phosphate buffer saline (PBS × 1; VWR, Radnor, PA, USA). After centrifugation, the pelleted biomass was resuspended in 200 mL of physiological saline solution (NaCl; 0.9% m/v), to a final concentration of approximately 2 to 6 × 109 colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL). The resulting bacterial suspension was either used directly for free cell survival determination or for spray-drying, as follows.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Isolation and Purification of Nanobody

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The vector pComb3xss-Nb was transformed into competent cells E.coli BL21 (DE3). After sequencing confirmation, individual clone was selected and cultivated in LBA medium (10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/L NaCl, supplemented with 100 μg/L ampicillin) with shaking at 250 rpm overnight. A 6 mL-aliquot of overnight culture was inoculated to 600 mL of LBA medium and shaken at 37 °C until OD600 value reached around 0.6, followed by the addition of 1 mM of isopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) for production of nanobody. The supernatant was collected by Sorvall Lynx 4000 centrifuges (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), and then purified on a 1-mL Ni-NTA resin column. The purified Nb was dialyzed in PBS buffer and identified by SDS-PAGE and western blotting according to the standard protocols24 (link), and the concentration was determined by using NanoDrop 2000C system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Graphite Surface Oxidation via Modified Hummers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surfaces of graphite particles were oxidized using a modified Hummers method. Instead of oxidation for two hours as is discussed in the original paper [46 (link)] in this case the oxidation was performed over 8 h to generate the desired carboxyl, hydroxyl and epoxy functional groups. In this procedure, 5 g of graphite was stirred with 100 mL of H2SO4. The mixture was cooled down to 5 °C in an ice/water bath and stirred for 8 h. In the next step, 300 mL of deionized water was added dropwise to the dispersion, while the temperature was kept below 40 °C. Then, 40 mL of concentrated H2O2 was added resulting in a color change. The color was brilliant brown, indicating oxidation of the graphite surface. Finally, the product was separated using a high-speed centrifuge (Sorvall LYNX 4000, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at 10,000 rpm at 25 °C for 20 min. The collected product was cleaned by re-dispersion in 0.1 M HCl and re-separated under centrifugation. This step was repeated several times using deionized water until the pH of the contacting water reached a value of 7. Finally, GO particles were freeze-dried to remove residual water.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!