The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Tbst rinse buffer

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies

TBST rinse buffer is a laboratory reagent used to prepare solutions for washing and rinsing procedures in various analytical techniques. It is composed of Tris-buffered saline (TBS) and Tween-20 detergent. The buffer helps to maintain the desired pH and ionic strength while also providing a mild detergent action to facilitate the removal of unwanted materials from samples or surfaces.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using tbst rinse buffer

1

Immunohistochemistry Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Slides (4 μm sections) were deparaffinized and rehydrated using standard histological protocols. Antigen retrieval was performed using an EDTA retrieval solution and a Decloaking chamber. The secondary antibody was SignalStain Boost (HRP, Rabbit; Cell Signaling Catalog #8114, Danvers, MA).The slides were stained using an Autostainer Plus (Dako, Carpenteria, CA) platform with TBST rinse buffer (Dako). The substrate used was 3,3, Diaminobenzidine (Dako). Lastly, the slides were counterstained with Hematoxylin (Cell Signaling).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of STING Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Slides were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was performed using Diva Retrieval (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA) and a decloaking chamber at 124 °C, 3 min, and cooled for 10 min. Slides were placed on an Autostainer Plus (Dako, Carpenteria, CA) using a TBST rinse buffer (Dako) and stained using: 3% H2O2 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) for 5 min, CAS Block (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) for 10 min, the primary antibody for STING (ab92605) (33) used per instructions. The secondary consisted of Envision Dual Link + (Dako) polymer for 30 min, rinsed, then a TBST holding rinse was applied for 5 min. The substrate used was 3,3, Diaminobenzidine + (Dako) for 7 min and counterstained with hematoxylin. STING staining were quantified by positive pixel count v9 algorithm (Aperio). A head and neck pathologist blinded to clinical patient data examined tumor sections. H-score of STING expression was calculated [25 (link)]. STING protein was expressed as an H score, defined as STING intensity multiplied by the percentage of STING positive cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of PD-L1 and pJAK2 in HNSCC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The University of Pittsburgh IRB #99-069 approved the use of clinical samples and written informed consent was obtained. Slides were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was performed using Diva Retrieval (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA) and a decloaking chamber at 124°C, 3 minutes, and cooled for 10 min. Slides were placed on an Autostainer Plus (Dako, Carpenteria, CA) using a TBST rinse buffer (Dako) and stained using: 3% H2O2 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) for 5 minutes, CAS Block (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) for 10 minutes, the primary antibody for PD-L1 (clone 405.9A11) (33 (link)) and the pJAK2 (Y1007-1008) (clone E132) used per instructions. The secondary consisted of Envision Dual Link + (Dako) polymer for 30 min, rinsed, then a TBST holding rinse was applied for 5 min. The substrate used was 3,3, Diaminobenzidine + (Dako) for 7 minutes and counterstained with hematoxylin. PD-L1 and pJAK2 staining were quantified by positive pixel count v9 algorithm (Aperio). A head and neck pathologist blinded to clinical patient data examined tumor sections. Scoring was determined by %tumor stained for PD-L1 or pJAK2, respectively. Tumors with <5% tumor cells positive staining were considered negative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of TIGIT and CD3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumors were harvested and fixed in 10% formalin (Fisher Scientific) for 24 h, then transferred to 70% ethanol. Further studies were performed post radioactivity decay. A 70–100% EtOH gradient was used to dehydrate the tissues over 12 h prior to clearance with histology-grade xylene (Leica) and paraffin embedding (Paraplast Plus, Leica). Next, the tissues were sectioned into 4 µm slices with a Leica RM2235 microtome, transferred onto Superfrost Plus slides (Fisher Scientific), and baked for 30–60 min at 60 °C. Antigen retrieval was performed using citrate and EDTA retrieval solutions at pH 6 and 9, respectively, and a decloaking chamber set to 120 °C. The slides were stained using an Autostainer Plus (Dako) with TBST rinse buffer (Dako). A CD3 antibody (polyclonal, Biocare Medical) was applied using a 1:400 dilution, while the TIGIT antibody (clone EPR26037-152, Abcam) was applied using a 1:100 dilution. For CD3 and TIGIT detection, a Mach 2 Rabbit polymer (Biocare Medical) and a Boost Rabbit HRP polymer (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA) were used. The substrate used was 3,3, Diaminobenzidine + (Dako). The slides were then counterstained with Hematoxylin (Dako).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Histological Analysis of Tumor Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor tissue from three patients identified through TIES was available for histological analysis. Formalin Fixed, Paraffin Embedded (FFPE) paired primary tumor and OM tissue was available from one patient; only OM tissue was available for the other two patients. Tissue sections were cut (4 μm) and stained, one with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), one with an E-cadherin antibody, and one with an estrogen receptor (ER) antibody. For antibody staining, the slides were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and stained using a standard histology protocol. Antigen retrieval was performed using a citrate buffer (Dako, Carpinteria, CA) in a decloaking chamber at 123 °C before being stained using an Autostainer Plus (Dako) platform with TBST rinse buffer (Dako). The E-cadherin antibody (Mouse monoclonal – 4A2C7, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) was applied using a 1:500 dilution at room temperature followed by a secondary antibody of Mach 2 Mouse HRP (Biocare Medical, Pacheco, CA). The ER antibody (Mouse monoclonal – 1D5, Dako) was applied using a 1:100 dilution at room temperature followed by a secondary antibody anti-mouse HiDef HRP Polymer System (Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA). Pictures were taken using a × 200 magnification with the software SPOT imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of STING Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Slides were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was performed using Diva Retrieval (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA) and a decloaking chamber at 124 °C, 3 min, and cooled for 10 min. Slides were placed on an Autostainer Plus (Dako, Carpenteria, CA) using a TBST rinse buffer (Dako) and stained using: 3% H2O2 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) for 5 min, CAS Block (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) for 10 min, the primary antibody for STING (ab92605) (33) used per instructions. The secondary consisted of Envision Dual Link + (Dako) polymer for 30 min, rinsed, then a TBST holding rinse was applied for 5 min. The substrate used was 3,3, Diaminobenzidine + (Dako) for 7 min and counterstained with hematoxylin. STING staining were quantified by positive pixel count v9 algorithm (Aperio). A head and neck pathologist blinded to clinical patient data examined tumor sections. H-score of STING expression was calculated [25 (link)]. STING protein was expressed as an H score, defined as STING intensity multiplied by the percentage of STING positive cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Slides were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in graded concentrations of ethanol in water, ending with a final rinse in water. Antigen retrieval was performed using a Diva Decloaker (DV2004, Biocare Medical, Pacheco, CA, USA) retrieval solution pH 6.2 and a Decloaking chamber at 120°C. The slides were stained using an Autostainer Plus (Dako, Carpenteria, CA) with TBST rinse buffer (Dako). The Ki-67 antibody was applied using a 1:100 dilution. The secondary consisted of Envision Dual Link + (Dako) HRP polymer. The substrate used was 3,3, Diaminobenzidine + (Dako). Lastly, the slides were counterstained with Hematoxylin (Dako).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

PD-L1 Immunohistochemistry in HNSCC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The University of Pittsburgh IRB #99–069 approved the use of clinical samples, and written informed consent was obtained. Slides were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Antigen retrieval was performed using Diva Retrieval (Biocare Medical) and a decloaking chamber at 124°C, 3 minutes, and cooled for 10 minutes. Slides were placed on an Autostainer Plus (Dako) using a TBST rinse buffer (Dako) and stained using 3% H2O2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 5 minutes, CAS Block (Invitrogen) for 10 minutes, and the primary antibody for PD-L1 (6.2 μg/mL final concentration, clone 405.9A11, kindly provided by Gordon J. Freeman) was used as previously reported (32 (link)). The secondary consisted of Envision Dual Link + (Dako) polymer for 30 minutes, rinsed, then a TBST holding rinse was applied for 5 minutes. The substrate used was 3,3,-diaminobenzidine + (Dako) for 7 minutes and counterstained with hematoxylin. PD-L1 staining was quantified by positive pixel count v9 algorithm (Aperio). A head and neck pathologist blinded to clinical patient data examined tumor sections. Scoring was determined by the percentage of tumor stained for PD-L1. Tumors with <5% tumor cell-positive staining were considered negative.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

IHC Staining of Mouse Tissue Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse tissues were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin (Sigma) and embedded in paraffin, then sectioned (5 μm) onto glass slides. Slides were deparaffinized and rehydrated using a standard histology protocol. Antigen retrieval was performed using 10 mM sodium citrate pH 6.0 buffer and a Decloaking chamber at 120°C. The slides were stained using an Autostainer Plus (Dako) with TBST rinse buffer (Dako). The following antibodies were used for IHC: anti-CD4 (Cell Signaling, D7D2Z, 1:100), anti-CD8 (Cell Signaling, D4W2Z, 1:400), anti-CD3 (Biocare Medical, 1:100), and anti-CD19 (Cell Signaling, D4V4B, 1:800). Detection consisted of Rabbit Boost (Cell Signaling) HRP polymer used with 3,3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Dako). Slides were finally counterstained with hematoxylin (Dako). Images were captured with an Olympus AX70 microscope using the Q-Capture Pro7 Program. H&E stained sections and immunohistochemistry of lymphoid malignancies and polycystic changes were evaluated by two board-certified pathologists including a veterinary pathologist (LHR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!