The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using mouse monoclonal anti tgf β1 antibody

1

Western Blot Analysis of Sirt1, p16, and TGF-β Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample collection and western blotting were performed as described previously [20 (link)]. Rabbit polyclonal anti-Sirt1 antibody (Sigma-Aldrich), rabbit monoclonal anti-p16INK4a antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), mouse monoclonal anti-GAPDH antibody (Sigma-Aldrich), mouse monoclonal anti-α-SMA antibody (Sigma-Aldrich), mouse monoclonal anti-TGF-β1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), rabbit monoclonal anti-phosphorylated Smad2 (p-Smad2) antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), mouse monoclonal anti-Smad2 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology), mouse monoclonal anti-α-tubulin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich), rabbit monoclonal anti-CD163 antibody (Abcam), and rabbit polyclonal anti-CD68 antibody (Abcam) were used as primary antibodies. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) or goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (Dako) were used as secondary antibodies. SuperSignal West Dura or Pico system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) was used to detect signals. The intensity of each band was analyzed by ImageJ software (version 1.47v; National Institutes of Health) and standardized by the level of either GAPDH or α-tubulin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Characterization of Inflammatory Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As primary antibodies, we used a rabbit monoclonal anti-HMGB1 antibody (ab79823; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), rabbit monoclonal anti-IL-18 antibody (ab223293; Abcam), rabbit monoclonal anti-IFN-γ antibody (ab133566; Abcam), mouse monoclonal anti-α-SMA antibody (A-2547; Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO), mouse monoclonal anti- TGF-β1 antibody (sc-130348; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), mouse monoclonal anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) antibody (G8795; Sigma-Aldrich), rabbit monoclonal anti-p-Smad2 antibody (#3108; Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), mouse monoclonal anti-Smad2 antibody (#3103; Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit polyclonal anti-Col-I antibody (ab6308; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-Col-III antibody (ab7778; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-CD3 antibody (IR503; Dako, Santa Clara, CA), rabbit polyclonal anti-CD68 antibody (ab125212; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-CD206 antibody (ab64693; Abcam) and rabbit monoclonal anti CD163 antibody (ab182422; Abcam).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of α-SMA, TGF-β1, and Smad2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sample collection and western blotting were performed according to previously described methods [26 (link)]. Mouse monoclonal anti-α-SMA antibody (Sigma-Aldrich), mouse monoclonal anti-TGF-β1 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), mouse monoclonal anti-GAPDH antibody (Sigma-Aldrich), rabbit monoclonal anti-p-Smad2 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), mouse monoclonal anti-Smad2 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology), and mouse monoclonal anti-α-Tubulin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich) were used as primary antibodies. Horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) or goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (Dako) was used as secondary antibodies. SuperSignal West Dura or the Pico system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) were used to detect signals. The intensity of each band was measured by ImageJ software (version 1.47v; National Institutes of Health) and normalized to the level of either GAPDH or α-tubulin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!