The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using anti rabbit antibodies

1

Western Blot Analysis of Caspase Activation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 10630 (1:10,000) and GN60622 (1:10,000) neoepitope antibodies against the p20 subunit of active Casp616 (link) and Tub∆Casp623 (link), respectively, were generated in our laboratory. The β-actin clone AC-15 (1:5000, Sigma-Aldrich), Casp6 p10 clone B93-4 (1:250, BD Canada, Mississauga, ON, CA), Casp3, and full-length α-tubulin (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) antibodies were diluted in 5% non-fat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween-20 (Sigma-Aldrich). Secondary anti-mouse (1:5000, GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Baie D’Urfe, QC, CA) and anti-rabbit antibodies (1:5000, Dako, Burlington, ON, CA) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) were used to detect immunoreactive proteins using ECL prime western blotting detection reagent (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) and Kodak BioMax MR film (Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA). Secondary anti-mouse conjugated to alkaline phosphatase (Jackson Immunoresearch Laboratories Inc., West Grove, PA) was developed with nitro-blue tetrazolium (ThermoSci) and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3′-indolyphosphate (ThermoSci). The western blots were scanned with an HP scanner and densitometry was performed using ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD) by rendering tiff images into an 8-bit format and measuring the intensity values above background. Images were not modified except to adjust the contrast for the entire blot.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blot Analysis of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total proteins from stably transfected MCF-7 and SUM159 cells were extracted with radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 1% Triton, 0.1% SDS, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate and 1% Nonidet P40). 25 μg of total cellular proteins were resuspended in laemmli buffer (4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 10% 2-mercaptoethanol, 0.004% bromphenol blue and 0.125 M Tris HCl, pH approx. 6.8) and heated at 95 °C for 5 minutes. Proteins were separated by a 4–15% Mini-PROTEAN® TGX Precast Gel (Biorad, Hercules, CA) and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Applichem, St. Louis, MO). The membrane was blocked for 1 hour with 3% non-fat dry milk in Tris buffered Saline/0.1% Tween-20. Immunoblotting was performed and antibodies specific for spinophilin (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, Cat.No. 9061S), the apoptosis marker PARP (Cell Signaling, Cat.No. 9542), pRb (directed against phosphorylated serine 807/8, Cell Signaling, diluted 1:1000 in 1% non-fat dry milk in Tris buffered Saline/0.1% Tween-20), and β-Actin (Sigma, Cat.No. A5441, clone AC-15) were detected using HRP-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibodies, respectively (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Visualization was performed using an enhanced chemoluminescence detection system (Super Signal West Pico, Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of IL-33 and NF-κB

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical staining was performed as previously described [17 (link)]. Tissue sections of whole ear were deparaffinized and rehydrated with xylene and graded ethanol solutions. The sections were incubated with anti-IL-33 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) for 1 h in PBS and anti-NF-κB p65 (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA) in PBS. After washing, the sections were incubated with anti-rabbit antibodies (Dako, Santa Clara, CA, USA) for 30 min and counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin. Images were taken using a light microscope at 200× (Nikon Instruments Inc.). Stained cells were counted using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Antibody-based Analysis of Septin Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rabbit polyclonal antibodies used were anti‐SEPT2, anti‐SEPT6, anti‐SEPT9 (as described in 12), anti‐SEPT7 (IBL 18991), anti‐p62 (MBL PM045) or P‐Drp1 (S616; Cell Signalling 3455S). Mouse monoclonal antibodies used were anti‐GAPDH (AbCam ab8245), anti‐GFP (ab1218), anti‐GFP 3E1 monoclonal (Cancer Research UK), anti‐p62 (BD 610832), Drp1 (ab56788) or Mfn1 (ab57602). Secondary antibodies used were Alexa 488‐, 555‐ or 647‐conjugated donkey anti‐rabbit or donkey anti‐mouse (Molecular Probes). F‐actin was labelled with Alexa 488, 555 or 647 phalloidin (Molecular Probes).
For immunoblotting, total cellular extracts eluted using Laemmli buffer (10 mM Tris–Cl pH 6.8, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol, 5% β‐mercaptoethanol, 0.01% bromophenol blue) were blotted with the above‐mentioned antibodies followed by peroxidase‐conjugated goat anti‐mouse (Dako) or anti‐rabbit antibodies (Dako). GAPDH was used throughout as a loading control. Proteins were run on 6, 8, 10 or 12% acrylamide gels. Protein levels were quantified by using the densitometry tool in Fiji (http://fiji.sc/Fiji) 51.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Adenoviral Hyaluronidase Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Supernatants from A549 infected cells with ICO15K, ICO15K-IIIaSA.PH20, and ICO15K-40SAPH20 at 20 TUs/cell were harvested 24, 48, and 72 h post-infection. Supernatants were resolved by electrophoresis on an 8% acrylamide gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane by standard methods. Then, membranes were immunoblotted with anti-PH20 antibody (Novusbio, ref. NBP1-81637) for hyaluronidase detection and with anti-Adenovirus 5 fiber antibody (Fitzgerald, ref. 10R-A116B) for fiber detection. Membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C and secondary labeled with correspondent anti-mouse (DAKO, ref. P0447) and anti-rabbit antibodies (DAKO, ref. P-0448) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Bands intensity were quantified by Image Lab v6.0.1 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!