The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

222 protocols using somatom sensation 16

1

3D-CT Scan Reconstruction and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3D-CT scans were obtained by two types of the 16 channel CT scanning equipment (GE ULTRA 16, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA; Siemens Somatom Sensation 16, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The slice intervals were at 0.6 mm and 0.62 mm, while the angle was at 0.1° with the precision of 0.1 mm in length. The tomographic images were reconstructed using Advantage Windows 4.1 of the GE Medical System to obtain 3D transparent images. In order to investigate the cross-sectional areas and short width of the safe zones along different angles, we used the oblique sagittal images on multiplanar reformation images that consisted of the axial, sagittal, coronal, and oblique sagittal images in the same screen (Fig. 1). The oblique sagittal images could be simultaneously generated after choosing the points and cross section on the axial image, and their cross sections were shown perpendicular to the sliced plane.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Abdominal CT Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All CT scans were acquired using multi-slice CT equipment (Philips Brilliance 64, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands; Siemens Somatom Sensation 16 or Somatom Definition Flash, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). PVP images of the liver/abdomen were obtained with a tube voltage of 100-120 kVp. The contrast medium (Ultravist 300 mgI/ml; Iopromide, Bayer Healthcare, Berlin, Germany) was prewarmed to 37 °C (99°F) and administered intravenously as a bolus injection of 110 ml at a rate of 3.5 ml/s, followed by a saline flush of 40 ml. The scan delay for the PVP was set at 70 s. Images were reconstructed in transverse plane using iterative reconstruction (Siemens Somatom Definition Flash) or filtered backprojection (Philips Brilliance 64/Siemens Somatom Sensation 16) with a soft tissue filter. Slice thickness was 3 or 5 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Magnetic Microbubble for MR Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The diagnostic potential of magnetic microbubble was investigated through in vitro MR imaging using 0.3 Tesla MRI machine SIEMENS SOMATOM Sensation 16. Agar phantom was made containing falcons of plain microbubbles and magnetic microbubbles with different Fe concentrations. For comparison with control Gadovist at high concentration was used to get negative contrast effect on T2. Samples were imaged using head-coil and spin-echo sequences to acquire T1 & T2 weighted images. T1 images were taken with TR = 519 ms and TE = 11 ms while for T2 images, TR was 8190 ms and TE = 117 ms for T2 weighted images, slice thickness 6 mm, and FS 0.19. The MR images intensities were calculated by using micro DICOM viewer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Coronary Artery Calcification from LDCT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MILD trial baseline LDCT images were acquired on a 16–detector row CT scanner (Somatom Sensation 16; Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany), while BioMILD trial baseline LDCTs were acquired on a second-generation dual-source CT scanner (Somatom Definition Flash, Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany). Details on LDCT acquisition and imaging interpretation have been reported elsewhere [25 (link),26 (link)].
LDCT images were transferred to a dedicated graphic station (Alienware Area 51 R6 equipped with Dual NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 C graphics), and CAC was automatically evaluated using commercially available AI-based software (AVIEW, Coreline Soft, Seoul, Korea). CAC was assessed based on the Agatston score and stratified as follows: 0, 1–10, 11–100, 101–400, and > 400 [22 (link),23 ,27 (link),28 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Murine Lewis Lung Carcinoma Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mouse Lewis lung carcinoma cell line (LLC) was purchased from Shanghai Cell Bank of Chinese Academy of Sciences. The MPE mouse model (C57BL/6J, six-week-old, male; Model Animal Research Center of Nanjing University) has been previously described (18 (link), 20 (link)) (Figure S1). Mice were reportedly administered with an intrathoracic injection of 200μg anti-PD1 mAb (InVivoMab anti-mouse PD-1 (CD279), Bioxcell)/0.9% normal saline on the 7th and 14th day of the model. We then injected 50 μL anti-CD8 mAb (4 mg/kg, InVivoPlus anti-mouse CD8A, Bioxcell) intraperitoneally multiple times to achieve CD8 depletion. The fixed mouse tissues were successively scanned using a CT machine (Siemens Somatom Sensation 16).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Preoperative Orbital Imaging Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data from the preoperative orbital imaging examinations were retrospectively analyzed. Of the 91 included patients, 73 underwent CT scans, 43 underwent MRI scans, and 25 underwent both CT and MRI scans.
The CT scans were performed using various scanners (GE Medical Systems, GE Lightspeed VCT, GE Discovery CT750 HD, GE OPTIMA CT660, Siemens Somatom Sensation 16, Siemens Somatom Definition AS, Siemens Somatom Definition Edge, Siemens Somatom Definition Flash) with multidetector capabilities ranging from 16 to 128 channels. The techniques and parameters varied depending on the system used; however, most examinations were performed using a 128-channel CT scanner (Somatom Definition Flash; Siemens Medical Solutions). The detailed CT imaging protocols are described in the Supplement.
The MRI scans were performed using various 3T MRI scanners (Magnetom Skyra, Siemens; Achieva, Philips Medical Systems; Ingenia CX, Philips Medical Systems) with a 16- or 64-channel head and neck coil. However, most examinations were performed with a 3T MRI scanner (Magnetom Skyra, Siemens) with a 64-channel head and neck coil. The MRI protocol for head and neck tumors consisted of axial and coronal T1- and T2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences with diffusion-weighted imaging and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI. The detailed MRI protocols are described in the Supplement.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating Lung Nodule Detection Method

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the present study, we evaluated our proposed method using chest CT scans from Wonkwang University Hospital (WKUH). For the clinical data, we collected chest CT digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) images of 84 anonymous subjects, including 42 subjects with juxta-pleural nodules. Each scan included 150 to 215 image frames, and there were 16,873 images in total. Among the images, 314 included juxta-pleural nodules. The images were acquired at WKUH using a multiple detector computed tomography (MDCT) scanner (Somatom Sensation 16, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany; X-ray tube voltage: 100–120 kV; tube current: 80–328 mA; pixel length: 0.56–0.79 mm). The thickness of each slice was 5.0 mm. The WKUH Institutional Review Board approved the collection and analysis of the imaging data. To evaluate the performance of the model, “gold standard” lung contours were obtained from six trained radiologists. Initially, four trained radiologists drew the contours, and another two trained radiologists confirmed them.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

3D Modeling of Piglet Anatomy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT analyses of the piglets were performed using a SOMATOM Sensation 16 CT scanner (Siemens AG, Munich, Germany). Piglets were subjected to CT after death. Each specimen was placed in a prone position, and noncontrast CT scans of sections 0.625-mm thick were obtained from vertical axial tomographs acquired at 0.625-mm intervals. Scan settings were 120 kVp, 400 mA, and a tube rotation time of 0.5 s. The grey-scale threshold was set to 75 to separate bone from the surrounding tissue using an adaptive threshold method. Three-dimensional (3D) models of the whole body were based on the 0.625-mm thick CT scan slices generated using Advantage Workstation 4.5 software (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Body Composition Assessment by DXA and CT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total fat and lean mass were measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (Hologic Discovery W, Hologic Inc., Beford, MA) to calculate the body fat percentage. Images from the region between L4 and L5, and the mid-thigh level were obtained using the multi-slice computed tomography scan (Somatom Sensation 16, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The fat areas were estimated in the range of −150 to −50 Hounsfield units (HU). The abdominal muscular wall was delineated using a manually drawn line to separate the VAT from the subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT6). IMAT was the fat area inside the muscle line manually drawn at the mid-thigh image. The areas that had attenuation values between 0 and 34 HU were considered as low-density muscle which indicates fat-rich muscle; the areas that had attenuation values between 35 and 100 were regarded as high-density muscle which indicates normal muscle. The thigh muscle cross-sectional area was a sum of the two muscle areas.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Robotic-Assisted Facet Joint Punctures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this phantom model study, we performed 40 facet joint punctures, 20 using a robotic targeting system and 20 using a freehand procedure, controlled by stepwise CT-scans. The primary endpoint of the study was the time required from planning the CT scan to the correct intra-articular placement of the 21-gauge puncture needle. Secondary endpoints were the accuracy of the needle placement, measured as axial and sagittal deviation, and the number of required needle adjustments.
Prior to the acquisition of a lateral topogram (Somatom Sensation 16, Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany), the phantom model (Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) was immobilized in a vacuum fixation system (iSYS Medizintechnik GmbH, Kitzbühl, Austria). Segment and side of the punctured facet joints were randomized but identical for robotic navigated approach and freehand approach. An experienced interventional radiologist (more than 200 facet joint punctures per year) carried out the procedures. Time requirements, number of corrections, and needle deviation were documented in an Excel spreadsheet.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!