The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using agilent 6550 ifunnel qtof

1

LC-QTOF-MS Metabolite Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-QTOF-MS analysis was conducted on an Agilent 1290 Infinity ultra-high-performance LC system coupled to an Agilent 6550 iFunnel QTOF (Agilent Technologies, Kista, Sweden).
A 19-min gradient was used on an Acquity HSS T3 column (150 × 2.1 mm, 1.8 μm, Waters, S) using 0.05% formic acid and 10 mm ammonium formate in water (A) and 0.05% formic acid in acetonitrile (B) as mobile phases at a flow of 500 μL/min. The gradient started with a hold of 1% B for 0.7 min. The metabolites were separated using a linear gradient to 40% B at 13 min followed by a steeper gradient to 95% B at 15 min, which was held until 18 min to wash the column before immediately returning to 1% B until 19 min to re-equilibrate. Injected was 1 μL of sample.
Mass spectrometric data were obtained in positive electrospray ionization mode using Data Dependent Auto MS/MS (gas temperature 150°C, gas flow 18 L/min, nebulizer 50 psig, sheath gas temperature 375°C, sheath gas flow 11 L/min, fragmentor voltage 380 V, collision energy 3 eV at 0 m/z ramped up by 8 eV per 100 m/z, 5 precursors within 200–800 m/z and >5000 counts per cycle, scan rate 6 spectra/s for MS and 10 spectra/s for MSMS, scan range 100–950 m/z in MS and 50–950 m/z in MSMS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Untargeted Metabolite Profiling of Seedlings

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metabolite profiling analysis of the parental seedlings was performed as described previously (Dan et al., 2020 (link)). Briefly, untargeted metabolite profiles of 15-d-old seedlings were collected with a 1290 Infinity liquid chromatography system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), Agilent quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Agilent 6550 iFunnel QTOF; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and Triple TOF 6600 mass spectrometer (AB SCIEX, Foster City, CA, USA). The metabolites were annotated using an in-house standard spectral library, and the lipids were annotated through matching with an in-house tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) spectral library. Data reliability was checked using a quality control sample, and the metabolite levels of a total of 3,746 detected analytes, among which 114 metabolites were annotated using the in-house spectral libraries, were normalized (sum, log, and none) for the statistical analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

UHPLC-HRMS Metabolite Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The intracellular extracts were analyzed by ultra high performance liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS) according to Klitgaard et al. [24 (link)]. Liquid chromatography was performed on an Agilent 1290 Infinity LC system with a DAD detector, coupled to an Agilent 6550 iFunnel Q-TOF with an electrospray ionization source (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The separation was performed on a 2.1 mm × 250 mm, 2.7 μm Poroshell 120 Phenyl-Hexyl column (Agilent) at 60 °C with a water-acetonitrile gradient (both buffered with 20 mM formic acid) going from 10 % (v/v) to 100 % acetonitrile in 15 min, followed by 3 min with 100 % acetonitrile. The flow rate was kept constant at 0.35 mL/min throughout the run. The injection volume, depending on the sample concentration, typically varied between 0.1 and 1 μL. Mass spectra were recorded as centroid data for m/z 85–1700 in MS mode and m/z 30–1700 in MS/MS mode, with an acquisition rate of 10 spectra/s. The lock mass solution in 95% acetonitrile was infused in the second sprayer using an extra LC pump at a flow of 10–50 μL/min, and the solution contained 1 μM tributyle amine (Sigma-Aldrich), 10 μM Hexakis(2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropoxy) phosphazene (Apollo Scientific Ltd., Cheshire, UK), and 1 μM trifluoroacetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) as lock masses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Serum Metabolite Profiling by UHPLC-QTOF/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serum sample preparation for the metabolic profile followed standard protocols that have been described elsewhere [16 (link), 17 (link)]. Blank samples (75% MeOH in water) and pooled quality control (QC) samples (pooling of aliquots of all samples) were also detected [18 (link)]. In brief, 400 μL of the precooled extraction solvent (V methanol: V acetonitrile = 1 : 1) was added to 100 μL of serum, vortexed (30 s), ultrasound-treated (10 min), and incubated for 1 h at −20°C. The precipitated proteins were centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C. The supernatant was transferred to a clean tube, dissolved with a 100 μL water/acetonitrile (1 : 1) solution, then vortexed (30 s), ultrasound-treated (10 min) at 4°C, centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C and then separated and subjected to metabolite analysis by ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight-mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QTOF/MS) using a UHPLC system (1290 series, Agilent Technologies, USA) coupled to a QTOF mass spectrometer (Agilent 6550 iFunnel QTOF, Agilent Technologies, USA). The mobile phase consisted of 25 mM NH4OH and 25 mM NH4Ac in water (pH = 9.75). Tandem mass spectrometry (MS) data acquisition was performed using another QTOF mass spectrometer (TripleTOF6600, SCIEX, Canada).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

UHPLC-HR-ESI-MS Pigment Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pigments were identified by UHPLC- High Resolution Electrospray Ionization (HR-ESI) MS analyses according to the method published by Klitgaard et al. [29 (link)], and using the Agilent 1290 Infinity LC system with a DAD detector, coupled to an Agilent 6550 iFunnel Q-TOF with an electrospray ionization source (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), and a Poroshell 120 Phenyl–Hexyl column (2.1 mm i.d. × 250 mm, 2.7 μm; Agilent). The analytical conditions used in this study were those earlier reported by Klitgaard et al. [29 (link)]: the separation was performed at 60 °C with a water-acetonitrile gradient (with 20 mM formic acid) going from 10% (v/v) to 100% acetonitrile in 15 min, followed by 3 min with 100% acetonitrile. The flow rate was kept constant at 0.35 mL/min. Mass spectra were recorded as centroid data for m/z 85–1700 in positive and negative ESI-MS mode, with an acquisition rate of 10 spectra/s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Untargeted Metabolite Profiling via UHPLC-QTOF/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The plasma samples were randomly injected for UHPLC-QTOF/MS analysis in both the electrospray positive and negative modes. Blank samples (75% ACN in water) and QC samples were injected between every eight samples during the acquisition. A UHPLC system (1290 series, Agilent Technologies, USA) coupled to a quadruple time-of-flight (QTOF) mass spectrometer (Agilent 6550 iFunnel QTOF, Agilent Technologies, USA) was employed for the primary metabolic detection and determination. Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) was performed using another QTOF mass spectrometer (Triple TOF 5600+, AB SCIEX, USA), which was better at performing a qualitative metabolite analysis. The QC samples were used for the MS/MS data acquisition. Four mass range segments, 50–300 Da, 290–600 Da, 590–900 Da, and 890–1200 Da, were used to expand the coverage of the MS/MS spectra. The acquired MS/MS spectra were matched with the in-house MS/MS spectral library (Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry), which has been verified by the metabolite standards for metabolite identification (details are described in the Supplementary Information).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Identification of Fungal Metabolites by UHPLC-HRMS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The secondary metabolites isolated in IC and EC extracts of F. oxysporum were identified by UHPLC-HRMS. Analyses were performed on an Agilent 1290 Infinity LC system with a DAD detector, coupled to an Agilent 6550 iFunnel Q-TOF with an electrospray ionization source (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The separation was performed on a 2.1 mm i.d. × 250 mm, 2.7 μm Poroshell 120 Phenyl-Hexyl column (Agilent) at 60 °C with a water-acetonitrile gradient (both buffered with 20 mM formic acid), according to the method described by Klitgaard et al. (2014 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Lipid Profiling of Implantation Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subsequent to the confirmation of implantation, the culture medium samples were
divided according to their implantation outcomes.
The lipids from culture medium were individually extracted using the Bligh and
Dyer method (Bligh & Dyer 1959 (link)), dried
and diluted in 400 µL of MeOH.
Mass spectra were obtained with a direct infusion of both the negative and
positive ion modes into a Q-Tof mass spectrometer (LC-MS, Agilent 6550 iFunnel
Q-TOF) equipped with an automated injector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Identification of Leptadenia reticulata Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Identification of secondary metabolites from Leptadenia reticulata was achieved using an Agilent 6550 iFunnel Q-TOF (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA), with both positive and negative modes [38 (link)]. Hypersil Gold C-18 (3 µm particle size, 2.1 mm internal diameter, and 100 mm length) was used for the separation of secondary metabolites. A flow rate of 300 µL/min was used. An aliquot of 3 µL was injected independently. 100% acetonitrile with 100% methanol made up mobile phase B, whereas 0.1% formic acid in water made up mobile phase A [39 (link)]. With the following parameters, a complete scan mode was attained in the 100–1000 amu range: capillary voltage (3500 V); nozzle voltage (1000 V); 13 L/min gas flow rate at 300 °C; and nebulization set at 35 psi. Mass Hunter Workstation was used for identification of secondary metabolites based on the m/z (mass/charge) values and spectrum graph.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Targeted Metabolomics Workflow Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All serum samples were randomly injected during data acquisition. During data acquisition, blank samples (75% methanol in water) and QC samples (prepared by pooling aliquots of all subject samples) were injected every 8 samples, and the test mixture (mixture of three internal standards) was injected every 20 samples to monitor the reproducibility of LC-MS system (Fig. S1).
The LC-MS analysis was performed using a UHPLC system (1290 series, Agilent Technologies, California, Santa Clara, USA) coupled to a quadruple time-of-flight (QTOF) mass spectrometer (Agilent 6550 iFunnel QTOF, Agilent Technologies, USA) in positive mode. Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) data acquisition was performed using another QTOF mass spectrometer (TripleTOF 6600, SCIEX, CANADA). The details of LC-MS analysis are provided in the Supporting Information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!