The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dneasy 96 tissue kit

Manufactured by Qiagen
Sourced in Canada, Germany

The DNeasy 96 tissue kits are designed for the efficient purification of total DNA from a variety of sample types, including animal tissues, cultured cells, and microorganisms. The kits utilize a silica-based membrane technology to capture and purify DNA, providing a reliable and consistent method for DNA extraction.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using dneasy 96 tissue kit

1

Tick-Borne Pathogen Screening Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All adult, nymphal and if required, larval I. scapularis were sent to the National Microbiology Laboratory (NML) at Winnipeg (Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada) for species verification. Adult and nymphal I. scapularis subsequently underwent testing at NML for B. burgdorferi, and four other I. scapularis-borne pathogens: Anaplasma phagocytophilum, B. miyamotoi, Babesia microti and Powassan Virus.
Laboratory analyses have been previously described [20 (link)]. Briefly, DNA was extracted using DNeasy 96 tissue kits (QIAGEN Inc., Mississauga, Canada). Initial screening for Borrelia spp. was conducted using the 23s ribosomal RNA real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. This was coupled with the msp2 real-time PCR for the detection of A. phagocytophilum [21 (link)]. Samples that tested positive for Borrelia spp. were subjected to the ospA real-time PCR to detect B. burgdorferi and the IGS real-time PCR for B. miyamotoi. Borrelia miyamotoi-positive samples were then verified with the glpQ real-time PCR [22 (link)]. Real-time PCR for the CCTeta gene was used to detect B. microti [23 ]. To ensure contamination did not occur during extraction and PCR runs, water blanks were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Tick-Borne Pathogen Detection Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blacklegged ticks submitted to the NML through active and passive tick surveillance are routinely tested for DNA or RNA of A. phagocytophilum, Babesia microti, a variety of Borrelia species including B. burgdorferi, and Powassan encephalitis virus by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as previously described.37 (link),38 (link) Briefly, for the detection of A. phagocytophilum DNA in ticks, we used Qiagen® DNeasy 96 tissue kits (Qiagen Inc., Mississauga, ON) for DNA extraction as per the manufacturer’s instructions. We eluted DNA in 200 μL of AE buffer and stored at −80°C before use. We used a duplex real-time PCR assay to screen the samples for A. phagocytophilum by targeting the msp2 gene.39 (link)We monitored each round of DNA extractions for cross-contamination by including at least two samples consisting only of nuclease-free water. Synthetic double-stranded DNA controls (Integrated DNA Technologies, Skokie, IL) for Anaplasma were included as positive controls in each PCR run, whereas no-template controls consisting of master mix only served as negative controls. In addition, our positive control DNA for A. phagocytophilum was an equine isolate (MN-93, courtesy of Tim Kurtti, University of Minnesota, MN) that had been propagated in HL-60 promyelocytic cell line (ATCC CCL-240).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Anaplasma Prevalence in Ticks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were conserved at room temperature for a maximum of 2 years. If a site had less than 30 ticks in a year, all samples were tested. If more than 30 ticks had been collected, a subsample of 30 to 40 ticks was randomly selected. Ticks from 2019 and 2020 were cut in half; one half was saved for the main study and the other was tested for the current investigation. Whole ticks were tested for the year 2021. In brief, DNA was extracted with DNeasy 96 tissue kits (Qiagen, Mississauga, ON, Canada) according to the manufacturer protocol. Samples were screened for Ap using multiplex real-time PCR (Courtney et al., 2004 (link)). Ap strains were identified with a single-nucleotide polymorphism assay targeting the 16S rRNA gene developed by Krakowetz et al. (2014 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Tissue Sampling and DNA Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue samples were taken from each fish spawned at all four hatcheries from 2011 to 2019 and dried on blotting paper in ventilated coin envelopes. The date of spawning, phenotypically identified sex, length, and presence/absence of an adipose fin were recorded for each sample. DNA was extracted from dried fin tissue with QIAGEN DNeasy 96 Tissue Kits following the manufacturer's animal‐tissue protocol using a BioRobot 3000 (QIAGEN Inc.). DNA was then diluted 1:2 in ddH2O prior to genotyping.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Molecular Screening of Tick-Borne Pathogens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A subset of adult and nymphal I. scapularis were submitted from each site to the National Microbiology Laboratory at Winnipeg (Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Ontario). One hundred and sixty-seven adults of the spring cohort, 58 adults of the fall cohort and 60 nymphs were submitted from TP, while 19 adults of the spring cohort, 99 adults of the fall cohort and 11 nymphs were submitted from MP.
All samples were tested for B. burgdorferi, B. miyamotoi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum and Babesia microti. Laboratory analyses have been previously described [17 (link)]. In brief, DNeasy 96 tissue kits were used to extract DNA (QIAGEN Inc. Mississauga, Canada). The 23s ribosomal RNA real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was then used to screen for Borrelia spp. If a sample tested positive, it was analyzed with the ospA real-time PCR to detect B. burgdorferi and the IGS real-time PCR to detect B. miyamotoi. The glpQ real-time PCR was then used to verify all B. miyamotoi-positive samples [18 (link)]. For A. phagocytophilum, the msp2 real-time PCR was employed [19 (link)], while the real-time PCR for the CCTeta gene was used to detect B. microti [20 ]. To verify that contamination did not occur during PCR runs, water blanks were used as negative controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DNA Barcoding of Glass Eel Species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five specimens of glass eel were chosen for species identification using a DNA barcoding approach. DNA was extracted from caudal peduncle tissue using the DNeasy 96 Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. A partial fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) was amplified following Ward et al. [29 (link)]. PCR product sequencing was performed by Macrogen (Amsterdam, The Netherlands). BLAST (NCBI, available online) was used for sequence identification. Sequence alignment was run by the ClustalW tool [30 (link)], while phylogenetic analysis was carried out using the Maximum likelihood (ML) approach in Mega v6 software [31 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

DNA Extraction for Bacterial Metabarcoding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to avoid cross-contamination of samples with environmental bacterial DNA, pre-PCR laboratory manipulations were conducted with filter tips under a sterile hood in a DNA-free room. DNA was extracted with the DNeasy 96 Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) with final elution in 200 μl of elution buffer. One extraction blank, corresponding to an extraction without sample tissue, was systematically added to each of the DNA extraction microplates. DNA was quantified with a NanoDrop 8000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States), to confirm the presence of a minimum of 10 ng/μl of DNA in each sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Assessing Transposable Element Diversity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the number of TE copies in each of the three species in the simulans complex, we used short reads of 115 lines (42 D. sechellia, 15 D. mauritiana, and 58 D. simulans). Table S1 describes which lines were previously sequenced and lists the accession numbers of all lines. To sequence new lines (two D. sechellia and two D. mauritiana), we obtained genomic DNA using the Qiagen®DNeasy® 96 Tissue Kit following the protocol and recommendations from the manufacturer. Next, we outsourced library construction and sequencing to the High Throughput Sequencing Facility at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. The libraries were built using the Nextera protocol as specified by the manufacturer. We obtained read quality information using HiSeq Control Software 2.0.5 and RTA 1.17.20.0 (real-time analysis). CASAVA-1.8.2 generated and reported run statistics of each of the final FASTQ files. Resulting reads ranged from 100 to 150 bp, and the target average coverage for each line was 20×. The mean coverage and accession numbers for these sequences is listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Rodent Spleen Microbiome Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rodent spleens were placed in RNAlater® storage solution (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) then stored at −20 °C until further analysis. Genomic DNA was then extracted from the spleen using the DNeasy® 96 Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Germany). Spleen DNA samples were screened for the presence of bacteria using universal primers (16S-V4F [GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA] and 16S-V4R [GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAATCC]) targeting the hypervariable region V4 of the 16S rRNA gene (251 bp) via Illumina MiSeq (Illumina) sequencing. The V4 region has been proven to have excellent taxonomic resolution at the genus level [37 (link)]. A multiplexing strategy enabled the identification of bacterial genera in each individual sample. We followed the method described in Kozich et al. [38 (link)] to perform PCR amplification, indexing, pooling, de-multiplexing and finally taxonomic identification using the SILVA SSU Ref NR 119 database as a reference [39 ] (http://www.arb-silva.de/projects/ssu-ref-nr/). We then used the trimming strategy of Galan et al. [39 ,40 (link)] in order to clean the raw data set and to estimate reliable rodent positivity for bacteria.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Genotyping and Hybrid Index Calculation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Host DNA was extracted from spleen and/or tail using DNeasy® 96 Tissue Kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer's instructions. All mice were genotyped either at 1401 ‘diagnostic’ X‐linked and autosomal SNP markers spaced approximately 1.86 Mb apart across the genome as part of a parallel study (see Wang et al. 2011) or at 11 diagnostic autosomal and X‐linked markers as described by Macholán et al. (2007). A Hybrid index (HI) was calculated to place any mouse on a linear scale from Mmd (HI = 0) to Mmm (HI = 1) depending on the count of musculus alleles at assayed loci (Macholán et al. 2007). Where it was necessary to categorize hosts, we divided them into western house mouse‐like and eastern house mouse‐like (Mmd: HI < 0.5 and Mmm: HI ≥ 0.5, respectively).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!