The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Stata 17.0 mp parallel edition

Manufactured by StataCorp
Sourced in United States

Stata 17.0 MP Parallel Edition is a statistical software package designed for data analysis, management, and visualization. It features parallel processing capabilities, allowing for faster computation on multi-core systems.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

2 protocols using stata 17.0 mp parallel edition

1

Evaluating Dental Implant Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The statistical analysis was performed with a commercially available software program (Stata 17.0 MP Parallel Edition, Stata Corp., College Station, TX, USA). Descriptive statistics, including mean and standard deviation, were carried out. The Kolmogorov–Smirnov analysis was used to check the normality of the distribution of the data. The similarity of the baseline cohort characteristics including, age, gender, RBH, and the diameter and the length of placed implants were examined using the Chi-square test. The unpaired t test was used for evaluating the RBH and ESBG between groups. The paired sample t test was used for in time group evaluations. The relationship between the RBH and ESBG was analyzed using Pearson correlation analysis. The significance level was set as p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comparative Segmentation Analysis of Retinal Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed using Stata 17.0 MP-Parallel Edition (StataCorp) or custom-written Matlab functions (Mathworks Inc). Continuous data were summarized as means and standard deviations (s.d.) and categorical data as frequencies and percentages. Evaluability was compared with a two-sample test of proportions, and under- and over-segmentation proportions using a Fisher’s exact test due to the small sample size in some cells and the paired comparison of evaluable versus non-evaluable images for the Canon and Horus devices was performed using an exact McNemar test. For all quantitative metrics, Canon segmented images were compared with those of Horus from the same eye using a Bland & Altman analysis [23 (link)], and agreement was quantified as mean difference and limits of agreement (1.96 times the s.d. of the differences). A Bradley & Blackwood (BB) test [24 (link)] was used to test the joint hypothesis of equal means and equal variances in the Bland & Altman analysis and a test of the regression of differences on sums was also performed [25 (link)]. For all statistical tests, the null hypothesis was rejected if α < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!