The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Bioruptor plus sonication system

Manufactured by Diagenode
Sourced in Belgium, United States

The Bioruptor Plus sonication system is a laboratory instrument designed for the fragmentation of DNA, RNA, and other biological samples using high-intensity ultrasound waves. The system is capable of precisely controlling the duration and intensity of the sonication process, allowing for efficient and reproducible sample preparation for various downstream applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using bioruptor plus sonication system

1

Measuring TiO2 and CB Nanoparticle Aggregation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hydrodynamic diameter of aggregates of TiO2- and CB-NPs was measured by DLS. Nanoparticles stock suspensions (2 mg ml−1) were sonicated with Bioruptor® Plus Sonication System (Diagenode Inc., Denville, NJ, USA) (20 kHz, 320 W) during 3 cycles of 30 s each. Right after the sonication, NPs were diluted as follow: in PBS 22 °C at 5, 20, 40 and 80 µg ml−1 and in DMEM/F12 37 °C at 5, 10, 25 and 50 µg ml−1 (these latter concentrations corresponded to exposure doses of NPs between 0.1 and 10 µg cm−2 in cell-based experiments). NP suspensions were centrifuged for 2 s at 2000 g to remove large aggregates. The supernatants were then analyzed by DLS. Of note, the 5 µg ml−1 concentration of NPs in PBS or DMEM/F12 was too low to estimate the hydrodynamic diameter by DLS. For other NPs concentrations, the hydrodynamic diameter was measured with a Vasco Kin™ particle size analyzer (Cordouan Technology, Pessac, France) in combination with the software NanoKin (V2.3.3.0). The following Vasco Kin Particle Size Analyzer parameters were chosen: temperature (22 °C or 37 °C), laser power (between 70 and 80%), acquisition mode (continuous), and analysis mode (Cumulants). The scattering angle was 170°. Each measurement was performed in triplicate (Additional files 1 and 2: Table S1 and Fig. S1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Serotonergic Differentiation and Nanoparticle Response

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1C11 cells were grown in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM high glucose, GlutaMAX™ supplement, Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS, Biochrom GmBH, Berlin, Germany). On addition of 1 mM dibutyril cyclic AMP (dbcAMP, Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) and 0.05% CyclohexaneCarboxylicAcid (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany), almost 100% of 1C11 cells acquire within 4 days a complete serotonergic phenotype (1C115−HT) [35 (link)]. Before cells were exposed to nanoparticles, nanoparticle stock solution (2 mg ml−1) was sonicated with Bioruptor® Plus Sonication System (Diagenode Inc., Denville, NJ, USA) (20 kHz, 320 W) during 3 cycles of 30 s each, then diluted to the proper concentration in serum-free DMEM/F-12 without phenol red, centrifuged for 2 s at 2000 g, and immediately used. Prepared nanoparticles were applied on cells grown to 90–95% confluency using the dose metric µg cm−2, which refers to the concentration of nanoparticles distributed over the surface of the cell culture plate. As done with other cell paradigms [17 (link), 31 (link)], and to identify molecular pathways by which NPs promote a loss of cell homeostasis, 1C11 cells and their serotonergic neuronal progenies were acute-exposed to several concentrations of TiO2- or CB-NPs ranging from 0.1 to 10 µg cm−2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation of Vitamin D Receptor and RXRα in HepG2 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HepG2 cells were grown in T75 flasks to a confluency of about 90% and transfected with 1.3× HBV genome construct. Vehicle or 10 nM calcitriol was added immediately after transfection. Cells were processed after 24 h using the EZ-ChIP Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Kit (Millipore) as per the manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, cells treated with 1% formaldehyde were washed, pelleted, and lysed to release chromatin. The cell lysate was sonicated using Bioruptor Plus Sonication System (Diagenode) for 4 × 10 cycles, for 30 s ON/30 s OFF at “high” setting to obtain DNA ranging from 200 bp to 1000 bp. The sheared chromatin was incubated with anti-VDR antibody (Abcam; ab3508), anti-RXRa antibody (Cell Signaling Technology; D6H10), or rabbit IgG (Thermo Fisher Scientific; 02-6102). Protein G Agarose beads were added to each sample the next day for 1 h at 4 °C to bind the antibody–chromatin complex, which was later eluted in the presence of 1% SDS and 0.1 M NaHCO3. Finally, the DNA–protein crosslinking was reversed in the presence of 200 nM NaCl at 65 °C for 4 h, and the DNA was subsequently purified using spin columns provided in the kit. Real-time PCRs were performed with primers listed in Table S2 to quantitate the immunoprecipitated target DNA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

HIF-2α Regulation of OPG Promoter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Tnfrsf11B (OPG) promoter was searched for consensus HREs containing a conserved RCGTG sequence. Potential HREs located within the Tnfrsf11b gene and promoter regions were predicted using the JASPAR CORE database with a relative score threshold of 0.85. ChIP assay was performed as described previously with the following modifications (Krieg et al. 2010 (link)). MC3T3-E1 cells were fixed 24 h after transfection with control or pcDNA 3.1 HIF-2-HA constructs (Addgene). Lysed cells were sonicated using a Bioruptor plus sonication system (Diagenode, Inc.) set at high power, 30 sec on, 90 sec off, and 60 cycles. Approximately 150 μg of sonicated chromatin was incubated overnight with rabbit anti-HA antibody (Abcam) followed by precipitation with protein A/G Dynabeads (Invitrogen). Normal rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used as a nonspecific IgG control. Five percent of the sample from each immunoprecipitation was reserved for input control. Relative enrichment was measured by qRT–PCR using a titration of pooled input samples as a standard curve and normalized to input after subtraction of IgG signal. Enrichments are presented as fold change relative to mock control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Hypoxia-Induced ChIP Assay Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ChIP assay was performed as described previously62 . ChIP was performed on MDA-MB-231 cells exposed to normoxia (21% O2) or hypoxia (0.5% O2) for 24 h using rabbit anti-HIF1α antibody (Abcam). Normal rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) was used as a nonspecific IgG control. Cells were formalin fixed, lysed, and sonicated using a Bioruptor Plus Sonication System (Diagenode Inc.) set at high power. Sonicated chromatin was incubated overnight with antibodies followed by precipitation with protein A/G Dynabeads (Invitrogen). Five percent of the sample from each immunoprecipitation was reserved for input control. Alternatively, relative enrichment was measured by quantitative RT-PCR using a titration of pooled input samples as a standard curve and normalized to input after subtraction of IgG signal. Enrichments are presented as fold change relative to normoxia or IgG control. Each primer sequence is indicated in Supplementary Data 5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP was performed as described previously (22 (link)), with the following modifications. Briefly, HCT116 cells were exposed to doxorubicin or 5-FU for 24 h prior to formaldehyde fixation. Fixed and lysed cells were sonicated using a Bioruptor Plus Sonication System (Diagenode) set at high power, 30 s ON, 90 s OFF, 60 cycles. Approximately 15–25 μg of sonicated chromatin was incubated overnight at 4°C with 2 μg of p53 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), histone H3 (Abcam), histone H3K4me3 (Abcam), histone H3K9me3 (Abcam), JMJD2B (Cell Signaling) antibodies, followed by precipitation with protein A/G Dynabeads (Invitrogen). Normal mouse or rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz Biothechnology) was used as a non-specific IgG control. Approximately 5% of the sample from each immunoprecipitation was reserved for input control. Immunoprecipitated complexes were washed, eluted and reverse crosslinked. DNA was purified with QIAquick PCR purification kit following the manufacturer's protocol (Qiagen). Relative enrichment of the samples was measured by qPCR using a titration of pooled input samples as a standard curve, and normalized to input after subtraction of IgG signal. Relative occupancy is presented as percentage of input. For histone ChIPs, H3K4me3 and H3K9me3 enrichments were normalized to bulk histone H3 signal. Primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed in Laemmli buffer, followed by four cycles of sonication (30/30s on/off) at low power settings on a Bioruptor Plus sonication system (Diagenode, B01020001). Before running samples on a gel, samples were incubated at 99°C for 10 min. Ten microliters of samples were run on NuPAGE 4 to 12% Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen) at 180 V using MES running buffer. Proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane and blocked with PBST + 5% milk for 1 hour, after which the membrane was stained with primary antibodies (table S3) in PBST + 5% milk and 5% FBS overnight at 4°C. The membrane was washed three times in PBST for 5 min and then incubated with PBST + 5% milk and secondary antibodies for 2 hours. The membrane was recorded using a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nuclei Extraction from Medicago Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Control Medicago cells were harvested by vacuum filtration at day 11 of growth as described above. Cells were ground with liquid nitrogen in a mortar. Ground cells were homogenized with cytoplasmic extraction buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.5, 0.45 M sucrose, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 0.5 mM PMSF, 0.364 µM Pepstatin A, 1.2 µM E64, 0.1% Triton X-100) in a 1:4 ratio (g of cells: mL of cytoplasmic extraction buffer). The homogenate was filtered with a nylon mesh, followed by several filtration steps with decreasing pore size filters (150 µm, 100 µm, 50 µm and 30 µm, Sysmex-Partec, Germany). To pellet the nuclei, the 30 µm filtrate was centrifuged for 5 minutes at 4000 g and the pellet washed with cytoplasmic extraction buffer without 0.1% Triton X-100 (adapted from51 (link)). The pellet was then resuspended in 100 µL of nuclei extraction buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 5.7, 420 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTANa2, 0.1 mM EGTA, 10% glycerol) and sonicated for 30 seconds (Bioruptor® Plus Sonication System, Diagenode, Belgium). After incubation on ice for 30 minutes, the homogenate was centrifuged at 11000 g for 10 minutes and the pellet was discarded. Total soluble protein was determined using the Bradford Protein Assay (Bio-Rad, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Nuclear extractions were stored at −80 °C until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

DRIP-seq for R-loop detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We followed a published DRIP-seq protocol (Sanz and Chédin, 2019 (link)). Briefly, we cultured RosacreMettl3F/F cells with and without 4-hydroxytamoxifen and LPS for 24 hours, stimulated with LPS+IL-4 for 2 days, then performed DNA extraction and digested using a cocktail of restriction enzymes (BamHI, EcoRI, HindIII, NcoI, SpeI and XbaI) and Rnase III (3U) overnight at 37°C in buffer 2.1 (NEB); RNase H (NEB) was added to the negative controls. Then we performed S9.6 IP (using 10 μg of S9.6 antibody per IP) and eluted. The immunoprecipitated DNA fragments were validated by qPCR at the Sμ region. DNA fragments were sonicated using the Bioruptor plus sonication system (Diagenode, 3 pulses, low intensity, 30 sec) before library preparation. DNA concentration was evaluated using the Qubit™ 1X dsDNA HS Assay Kit (Life Technologies). DNA fragments were prepared for the final library following the protocol for the NEBNext® Ultra™ II DNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina, manufactured by NEB. Adaptor-ligated and final DNA products were cleaned up using AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter). Barcoding was performed using NEBNext® Multiplex Oligos from Illumina® (NEB).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Histone Extraction and Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacteria were harvested by centrifugation (4000 rpm for 15 min at 4°C), the supernatant discarded, and the pellet resuspended in a small volume of Histone Wash Buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA). Cell envelopes were disrupted using a Bioruptor Plus sonication system (Diagenode s.a., Belgium) for 10 cycles, 30 s on/off with power set to high. The soluble protein fraction was separated from cellular debris by centrifugation at 15,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C, while the insoluble fraction was obtained by re-suspending the pelleted debris in Histone Wash Buffer. The protein concentration in the cell lysate was quantified with a Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific, UK) using the provided albumin as standard. Protein fractions were separated by means of 16.5% Tris-tricine precast gels (Bio-Rad Laboratories, California) and bands were revealed by colloidal Coomassie (InstantBlue, Sigma-Aldrich) staining. Histone-expressing strains showed a band close to the size expected for HMfA/B (Figure 1—figure supplement 2). This band was excised and protein identity confirmed as HMfA/B via mass spectrometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!