The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

94 protocols using qtrap 4500

1

Quantification of Vitamin D Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Venous blood samples for vitamin D metabolites were collected at three time points (1 h before, and 1 h and 3 h after the exercise) into tubes containing a coagulation accelerator. The serum was separated using a laboratory centrifuge, aliquotted into 1.5-mL centrifuge tubes, and frozen at −80 °C until further analysis.
Before the analysis, serum proteins were precipitated and derivatized using a Cookson-type reagent (DAPTAD). Proteins were precipitated using acetonitrile. For 1,25(OH)2D3 determination, the sample preparation involved liquid–liquid extraction with ethyl acetate. Quantitative analyses were performed using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (Exion LC system coupled with QTRAP4500, Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA). Chromatographic separation was carried out using an XDB-C18 column (50 × 4.6 mm, 1.7 μm; Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Serum samples were analyzed in the positive ion mode, using electrospray ionization. The concentrations of the following vitamin D metabolites were determined: 25(OH)D3, 24,25(OH)2D3, 1,25(OH)2D3, 3-epi-25(OH)D3, and 25(OH)D2. The concentration range was 1–100 ng/mL for 25(OH)D3; 0.1–10 ng/mL for 25(OH)D2, 3-epi-25(OH)D3, and 24,25(OH)2D3; and 10–200 pg/mL for 1,25(OH)2D3. In addition, the ratios of 25(OH)D3 to 24,25(OH)2D3, and 25(OH)D3 to epi-25(OH)D3 were calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantification of FAM-UNO in Tumor Lysate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
High-performance liquid chromatography (Agilent 1200 series, USA) – mass spectrometry (Sciex Q-Trap 4500, Canada) analysis was done using a C18 column (Kinetex 2.6 µm EVO C18 100 × 4.6 mm, Phenomenex, USA). Ionization was performed at 300 °C with declustering potential set 30 V. Chromatography gradient started with 2 min 5% acetonitrile in water, followed by linear increase to 95% acetonitrile in 10 min and finally 10 min isocratic flow of 95% acetonitrile in water. Both eluents, water and acetonitrile, contained 0.2% formic acid. Flow rate was 0.3 ml/min. Column temperature was maintained at 40 °C. Autosampler temperature was set to 37 °C.
Retention times and m/z signals of FAM-UNO, were determined from 30 µM FAM-UNO solution in PBS. Tumor lysate was split into two aliquotes of 200 µL in each. From one aliquot, 20 µL were injected and the LC-MS profile obtained. The second aliquot was mixed with 50 µL of 30 µM FAM-UNO in PBS and injected within 1 min to LC-MS and the LC-MS profile obtained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

PAMPA Assay for Metabolite Permeability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatography fraction G from the original rarefication of the crude cyanobacterial extract was evaluated using PAMPA. The same method was used as described above. Following the PAMPA protocol, the plates were evaluated using LC-MS/MS with MRM on a SCIEX Qtrap 4500 mass spectrometer. The transitions for each monitored metabolite were determined utilizing the product ion function of a SCIEX HIRES TripleTOF 4600 mass spectrometer with Analyst TF software. The relative quantity of metabolites was measured using the area under the curve (AUC) for each metabolite. The closer the AUC of the donor and the acceptor plate shows higher permeability.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating MIP Leaching in SPE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To examine the applicability of developed MIPs as SPE extraction materials, we checked the potential leaching of the template from the MIP. As reported under the upscale experiment (Section 2.7), 50 mg of each MIP was packed in the SPE column, conditioned, loaded, and eluted with 5 mL 1% TFA in MeOH. The extract was dried under nitrogen at 40 °C and the amount of leaching was quantified with a Nexera X2 ultra high performance liquid chromatograph (UHPLC, Schimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) coupled to the hybrid quadrupole-linear ion trap mass spectrometry analyzer QTRAP 4500 (Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA) following the method developed by Gornik et al., (2020a) [9 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Fungal Amino Acid Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We transferred 100 mg fungal biomass into Eppendorf tubes containing glass beads and 1 mL ethanol (80%) solution in water. Homogenization with FastPrep-24 (MP-Biomedicals) was conducted for 2 min. Next, the sample was centrifuged (2 min, 6,000×g) and 50 μL of the supernatant was diluted with deionized water. Fungal amino acid concentrations were determined in duplicates by an aTRAQ Kit for amino acid analysis of physiological fluids (Sciex) with a QTRAP 4500 (Sciex) mass spectrometer connected to an Eksigent microLC 200 (Sciex). Detailed analysis was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Untargeted and Targeted Metabolomics Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For untargeted analyses, the pre-prepared EBC and serum samples were randomized and analyzed on a QTRAP 3200 (Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA) mass spectrometer. Ten μL of redissolved serum and 50 μL of EBC was directly injected and analyzed in isocratic flow of 0.05 mL/min water, 0.15 mL/min methanol, and 0.1% formic acid. Electrospray ionization MS scans were performed in negative and positive modes with a rate of 1000 amu/s between the mass ranges of 90 to 1400 Da. Ionspray voltage, declustering potential, and entrance potential were set to 4500 V, 20 V, and 10 V, respectively with the use of corresponding negative voltages in the negative scanning mode.
For targeted analysis, serum samples were measured on QTRAP 4500 (Sciex, Framingham, MA, USA), coupled to a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Agilent 1260 series, Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) using the AbsoluteIDQ p180 kit (Biocrates Life Sciences AG, Innsbruck, Austria) according to the manufacturer’s specifications. The resulting data were absolutely quantified concentrations of amino acids, acylcarnitines, biogenic amines, glycerophospholipids, hexose, and sphingolipids.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Kynurenine and Tryptophan in Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To measure Kyn and Trp in tumor tissues, the tumor tissues were dried with filter paper, weighed, and put into 2 mL FastPrep® homogenization tubes with three stainless steel beads (2 mm), and 500 µL of methanol was added. Subsequently, the tumor tissue samples were homogenized at 9391 g for 2 min, performed with 10 s of homogenization at 10 s intervals. After centrifugation (10,000 g, 10 min), the contents of Kyn and Trp in the supernatant were then examined by using a highly sensitive series triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (SCIEX, QTRAP 4500).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Metabolite Profiling of Murine Kidneys

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phase extraction of metabolites from the frozen kidney samples of mice was performed as previously described (64 (link)). The AbsoluteID p180 Kit (Biocrates Life Sciences) was used to determine 186 metabolites. The samples were measured on mass spectrometer QTRAP 4500 (Sciex), in combination with a high-performance liquid chromatography (Agilent Technologies). The concentrations of the metabolites were calculated automatically by the MetIDQ software (Biocrates Life Sciences). The levels of reduced glutathione and oxidized glutathione were quantified with a luminescence-based glutathione assay (GSH-Glo; Promega). See Supplemental Table 3 for the summary of all significantly altered metabolites in the kidneys from Stk25–/– versus WT mice.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Mass Spectrometry-based Proteomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Analysis was performed as previously dicribed55 (link). For protein identification, wiff data files were analyzed with ProteinPilot 4.5 revision 1656 (Sciex, USA) using search algorithm Paragon 4.5.0.0 revision 1654 (Sciex, USA) and a standard set of identification settings to search against M. gallisepticum S6 CP006916.2NCBI protein database supplied with common contaminants. The following parameters were used: alkylation of cysteine-iodoacetamide, trypsin digestion, TripleTOF 5600 equipment, species: none, thorough search with additional statistical FDR analysis. Peptide identifications were processed with default settings by a ProteinPilot software built-in ProGroup algorithm. The final protein identification list was obtained with the threshold reliable protein ID unused score calculated by ProteomicS Performance Evaluation Pipeline Software (PSPEP) algorithm for 1% global FDR from fit.
Quantitative LC-MS protein analysis was performed on the basis of MRM methodology on QTRAP 4500 (Sciex, USA) triple quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with a NanoSpray III ion source (Sciex, USA) coupled to an expertNanoLC400nano-HPLC system (Eksigent, USA). The details of the MRM analysis are described in the Supplementary Information.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Extraction and Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Sphingolipids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We extracted 100-mg biomass samples with 4 mL ethyl acetate/isopropanol/water mixture (60:30:10, v/v/v) [25 (link)]. Qualitative analysis of sphingolipids from evaporated extracts was obtained by examining their mass spectrum using a triple quad mass spectrometer QTRAP 4500 (Sciex) operating in the MRM positive ionization mode as previously described [26 (link)]. For the reversed-phase chromatographic analysis, 10 μL of the lipid extract was injected on a C18 column (the same model as mentioned above). The solvents and gradient elution were identical to that applied for the determination of phospholipids.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!