The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

34 protocols using echopac workstation

1

Echocardiographic Analysis of Cardiac Outcomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Echocardiograms were acquired with the Philips IE33, Sonos 7500, or GE Vivid 7 machines and analyzed on the Xcelera workstation (Philips Medical Systems, Andover, MA) at the Massachusetts General Hospital; and with the GE Vivid 7 machine and EchoPAC workstation (GE, Milwaukee, WI) at the Jewish General Hospital. Clinical data, including in‐hospital outcomes, were extracted from the STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database and vital status was extracted from the Social Security Death Index by way of the Research Patient Data Registry (Partners Healthcare, Boston, MA) at the Massachusetts General Hospitals; and from the ChartMaxx electronic medical record at the Jewish General Hospital.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Echocardiographic Evaluation of TERT-Deficient Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TERT−/− rats (6 males and 7 females) and their counterpart littermates, WT (6 males and 6 females), were subjected to noninvasive two-dimensional echocardiography as previously described (40 (link), 41 (link)). Briefly, on the day of the experiment, rats were anesthetized (1–2% isoflurane), and baseline echocardiograms were recorded using a General Electric Vivid 7 system (Waukesha, WI) equipped with an 11 MHz M12L linear transducer. Standard parasternal short axis images were obtained at the mid-left ventricular level (papillary muscles served as markers) by two-dimensional echocardiography. The images were then analyzed using Echo-PAC workstation with Q analysis software (General Electric, Waukesha, WI). LV dimensions were measured in diastole and systole, as well as the anterior and posterior wall thickness in diastole. Fractional shortening (FS), left ventricular mass (LVM) and ejection fraction (EF) were determined using previously described calculations (40 (link), 41 (link)). Investigators were blinded to the experimental groups for the duration of the echocardiographic measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Cardiac Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cardiac function was evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography (Irie et al., 2015 (link)). Mice were anesthetized with 3% isoflurane, which was reduced to 1.5% isoflurane during echocardiography. Images were collected using a 14.0-MHz linear probe (Vivid 7; GE Medical System, Milwaukee, WI). Body temperature was maintained at 37°C during echocardiography. M-mode images were obtained from a parasternal shortaxis view at the midventricular level with a clear view of the papillary muscle. Left ventricular (LV) internal diameters at end-diastole and end-systole were measured. LV fractional shortening was calculated on an EchoPAC workstation (GE Healthcare, Wauwatosa, WI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Echocardiographic Assessment of LV Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transthoracic echocardiograms were acquired by use of Vivid 7 or E9 (GE Healthcare) and analyzed on the EchoPAC workstation (GE Healthcare) (8 (link), 17 (link)). Left ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes were measured by the Simpson method of discs (18 (link)) in the apical 4- and 2-chamber views, and LVEF was calculated as follows: (end-diastolic volume – end-systolic volume)/enddiastolic volume × 100%. All measurements were made at a centralized reading center by a single observer who was blinded to all clinical and biomarker data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Strain Measurement Comparison: In Vivo and In Vitro

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To further compare in vivo and in vitro conditions, strain measurements were performed both in the silicone phantom and in the in vivo heart. 3D-PTV data was used to extract strain in the silicone phantom. The strain is calculated as γ=(LL0)/L0, where L0 is the initial length of interest and L is the length at a certain time instance.
In vivo strain measurements were performed using 2D transthoracic echocardiography from the apical four-chamber view at rest (Vivid 9 echocardiography scanner, GE Medical Systems, Horten, Norway). Deformation imaging by speckle tracking is a technique, which is an angle-independent method avoiding limitations related to translational cardiac motion. The endocardial border was traced and the region of interest was adjusted to the myocardial wall. Wall motion was tracked over the cardiac cycle. Myocardial speckle tracking was digitally analyzed using Echo Pac Work Station (GE Medical Systems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Assessing Left Ventricular Systolic Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) was calculated in the longitudinal three-chamber, two-chamber, and four-chamber views by 2D-speckle-tracking echocardiography with high-quality ECG gated images. The frame rate was set at between 50 and 90 frames/s, and a minimum of three cardiac cycles were obtained for each loop. The images were analyzed using software with the EchoPAC workstation (version 112, GE Healthcare, USA). The left ventricular endocardial border was manually traced in the end systole. Subsequently, software generates a speckle-tracking region-of-interest (ROI) to include the entire myocardium between the endocardium and the epicardium. The left ventricular was divided into 18 myocardial segments. Longitudinal strains for each segment were recorded and presented as a bull's eye. The strain values for all the segments are recorded and averaged to obtain the global longitudinal strain. GLS is presented as a percent change (%). Negative values of GLS indicate myocardial contraction. The predefined cutoff for subclinical left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with septic shock was defined by a GLS ≥ −15% (less negative than −15%) according to the previous studies [14 (link)–16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Feline Echocardiographic Examination Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A complete echocardiographic examination of the heart was performed by two experienced veterinarians (ADP, MB) according to the guidelines [28 (link)]. A Vivid E9 echocardiographic system (General Electrics Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, United States) with a 5–10 MHz transducer was used. A limb ECG lead II was recorded simultaneously. Loops and images were analyzed using an offline Echo-PAC workstation (GE Healthcare, Europe). In all cats, the following echocardiographic parameters were measured: two-dimensional left atrial measurements from the right parasternal long and short-axis view; left ventricular M-mode or 2-D measurements from the right parasternal short-axis view; spectral and color flow Doppler velocities from the left apical view; and tissue Doppler annular velocities from the left apical view.
Normal cats were considered according to previously published feline echocardiographic references, and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy was diagnosed if the LV wall was thicker than 6 mm [29 (link),30 (link),31 (link)]. All animals with systemic hypertension, hyperthyroidism, aortic stenosis, neoplastic infiltration or other congenital and acquired diseases were excluded from the study. Restrictive cardiomyopathy was diagnosed when normal LV walls with biatrial enlargement and restrictive mitral inflow pattern was detected [32 (link),33 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Echocardiographic Evaluation of Left Ventricular Mechanical Dyssynchrony

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All included patients were subjected to a thorough history taking and clinical assessment including New York Heart Associations (NYHA) class and 12-lead surface ECG to evaluate QRS duration and morphology in addition to PR interval.
Trans-thoracic echocardiographic examination was performed using a Vivid E9 XD Clear Echo machine (GE Healthcare, Horton, Norway) with tissue Doppler and speckle tracking imaging, which was attached to an Echo-Pac Work Station (version 201). The following parameters were measured:
A. Evaluation of LVMD parameters (defined as a difference in the timing of mechanical contraction between different segments of the left ventricle) and interventricular dyssynchrony using the following echo-Doppler modalities:
We proposed the following scoring system for LVMD:
LVMD was considered present if the patient had ≥ 4/7 of LVMD indices with the maximum possible 7 points.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Complete Transthoracic Echocardiographic Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A complete transthoracic echocardiogram was performed using a GE VIVID E9 ultrasound system (GE Ultrasound, Horten, Norway) equipped with a phased-array transducer (M5S). Standard echocardiographic parameters were obtained according to the principles described in the ASE/EACVI recommendations [7 (link)]. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was measured using the apical biplane Simpson’s method. LV dysfunction was defined as LVEF < 52% for men and LVEF < 54% for women, consistent with the current recommendations [7 (link)]. Left ventricular diastolic function and the severity of valvular regurgitation (AR, MR, TR) and aortic stenosis (AS) were assessed using an integrated method consistent with the established practice guidelines [8 (link),9 (link),10 (link)]. The systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) was estimated using TR peak velocity and right atrial pressure, which was estimated by the inferior vena cava diameter in a long-axis subxiphoid view and its response to inspiration. All echocardiograms were stored digitally, and further offline analysis was performed using an EchoPAC workstation (v201, GE Healthcare, Horten, Norway).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Standardized Echocardiographic Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients underwent echocardiography at the time of enrollment. Patients were examined in the left lateral decubitus position using a GE VIVID E95 ultrasound system (GE Ultrasound, Horten, Norway) equipped with a phased-array transducer (M5S). Standard echocardiographic parameters were obtained according to the guidelines of the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) recommendations (12 (link), 13 (link)). Data acquisition was obtained from the parasternal long- and short-axis views and the three standard apical views. Three consecutive cardiac cycles were recorded during quiet respiration for each view. Grayscale recordings were optimized for LV evaluation at a rate of 50–80 frames/s, and only patients with these parameters were included in the subsequent analyses. All echocardiograms were digitally stored, and further offline analysis was performed using a commercial EchoPAC workstation (v204, GE Healthcare, Horten, Norway).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!