The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using cd4 clone sk3

1

Multicolor Flow Cytometry Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Depending on the experiments, cell populations were labeled with combinations of the following antibodies: Live/Dead stain (APC-CY7; Invitrogen), CD4 (clone SK3; BD), CD8 (clone RPA-T8; BD), p24 (clone KC57-RD1; Coulter Clone), MIP-1β (clone 24006; R&D Systems), and CD107a (clone H4A3; BD). The intracellular staining assay was performed as described previously (25 (link)), with some modifications. Briefly, CD107a was added to the culture with CD8+ T cells and incubated for an additional 3 h in the presence of brefeldin A (10 μg/ml) and GolgiStop. Cells were then stained first with Live/Dead stain and for surface markers of CD4 and CD8 and fixed with 1% formaldehyde overnight. The following day, the cells were permeabilized with buffer containing saponin and stained for p24 and/or MIP-1β. All samples were fixed for 2 h with 1% formaldehyde before being acquired on an LSRII flow cytometer. Data were analyzed with FlowJoV (Tree Star Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Expansion and Characterization of Human Tregs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD4+CD25++CD127−/low putative Tregs, aseptically flow-sorted from peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), were expanded using a modification of our previously described protocol (Figure 1) (18 (link)). Briefly, these cells were stimulated with anti-CD3/CD28-coated microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn CA, bead: cell ratio of 1:2) on day 0 and cultured in X-Vivo-15 media supplemented as previously described (18 (link)), including 2000 IU/ml of rhIL-2. At days 12 and 24, (20 ) cultures were re-stimulated as on day 0. Treg cultures were pulsed with 100 nM of rapamycin for 48 hours from day 34-36, given our previous results showing that this optimized Treg suppressive activity. (18 (link)). Tregs were then harvested, washed free of rapamycin, magnetic beads removed, and cryopreserved as previously described. (18 (link)) The Treg phenotype was assessed by staining for CD3 (clone SP34-2, BD, San Jose, CA), CD4 (clone SK3, BD), CD25 (clone 4E3, Miltenyi Biotec), CD127 (clone eBioRDR5, eBioscience, San Diego, CA) and FoxP3 (clone PCH101, eBioscience) using the FoxP3 Fix/Perm Buffer Set (BioLegend, San Diego, CA). In some experiments, Tregs were also labeled with an anti-Ki-67 antibody (Clone B56, BD). Data were acquired on an LSR II flow cytometer and analyzed using FlowJo software (Treestar, Ashland, OR). Positively stained cells were identified using appropriate isotype-control antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

T-Cell Subsets Isolation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For CD4 + CD8-CD45RA + CD45RO−, CD4 + CD8-CD45RA–CD45RO+ and CD4-CD8+ T-cell separation, isolated mononuclear cells were stained with antibody to CD45RA (clone HI100; BD Pharmingen), CD45RO (clone UCHL1; BD Pharmingen), CD4 (clone SK3; BD Pharmingen) and CD8 (clone RPA-T8; BD Pharmingen). Cells were sorted using a FACSAria cell sorter (BD Biosciences). Recovered cells were lysed in Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) and stored at −80 °C. Data was analyzed using FlowJo software (TreeStar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry of Immune Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For all experiments, cells were stained with antibodies diluted in PBS/0.5% FBS in 1:50 V/V ratio at 4°C for 30 minutes. The following antibodies were used: CD4 (clone SK3), CD8 (clone SK1), CD134 (OX40, clone ACT35), CD137 (4-1BB, clone 4B4-1), and anti-mouse TCRβ Chain (clone H57-597) (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Flow cytometric analysis was performed on FACS Canto I cell analyzer (BD Biosciences). Data was analyzed using FlowJo 10.2 software (TreeStar, Ashland, OR).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Flow Cytometry Analysis of CAR T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences) instrument was used to acquire flow cytometry data, which was analyzed using FlowJo v10.7 (BD Biosciences). For surface staining, samples were washed with and stained in PBS (Lonza) with 1% FBS (GE Healthcare). For all experiments, matched isotypes or known negatives (e.g. nontransduced T cells or B7-H3-negative cell lines) served as gating controls. CAR detection was performed using F(ab’)2 fragment-specific antibody (polyclonal, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA). T cells were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies using combinations of the following markers: CD4 (clone SK3, BD Biosciences), CD8 (clone SK1, BD Biosciences), CCR7 (clone G043H7, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), and CD45RO (clone UCHL1, BD Biosciences). LM7 and the negative control leukemia cell line BV173 were evaluated for expression of B7-H3 using B7-H3 antibody (clone 7-517, BD Biosciences, or clone FM276, Miltenyi). Cells were additionally stained with DAPI (BD Biosciences) to gate for live cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Flow Cytometric Analysis of CAR T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences) instrument was used to acquire flow cytometry data, which was analyzed using FlowJo v10 (BD Biosciences). For surface staining, samples were washed with and stained in PBS (Lonza) with 1% FBS (GE Healthcare). For all experiments, matched isotypes or known negatives (e.g., NT T cells) served as gating controls. CAR detection was performed using F(ab′)2 fragment=specific antibody (polyclonal, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA). T cells were stained with fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies using combinations of the following markers: CD4 (clone SK3, BD Biosciences), CD8 (clone SK1, BD Biosciences), CCR7 (clone G043H7, BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), CD45RO (clone UCHL1, BD Biosciences), and 41BBL (clone 5F4, BioLegend). Tumor cell lines were evaluated for expression of B7-H3 using B7-H3 antibody (clone 7-517, BD Biosciences, or clone FM276, Miltenyi). To determine apoptosis, T cells were labeled with annexin V (BD Biosciences) and DAPI (BD Biosciences). The percentages of apoptotic cells were determined by the percent annexin V positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

T-cell Response to Omicron Variant

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T-cell lines were analyzed after stimulation with “WT CD4+ pool” or “Omicron CD4+ pool” (1 μM/peptide) for 6 h. During the last 5 h, a mixture of Brefeldin A and Monensin (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA) was added. Cells were stained for antihuman CD3 (clone HIT3A; BioLegend), CD4 (clone SK3), and CD8 (clone RPAT8; both BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NY, USA). After fixation and permeabilization, using FoxP3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), cells were stained intracellularly for antihuman, CD154 (clone TRAP1; BD Bioscience), and cytokines: IFN-ɣ (clone 4S.B3; BD Bioscience), IL-2 (clone MQ1–17H12; Thermofisher), or TNF-α (clone Mab11; Thermofisher). Cells were acquired on a FACS Symphony A3 analyzer (BD) and analyzed using FlowJo (V10, Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA). On average, 40,000 events were acquired; however, in the T-cell lines obtained from the convalescent subjects, the number of events was often somewhat lower (i.e., 8000 events).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Phenotyping of Skin-Homing T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBMCs were isolated from peripheral blood through ficoll and were stored in liquid nitrogen until use. Monoclonal antibody staining of PBMCs was performed as described earlier [9 (link)]. Briefly, cells were incubated for 15 min at room temperature with either the first panel including human antibodies: CCR10 (clone 314305; R&D), CD45RO (clone UCHL1; BD Biosciences), CCR6 (clone 11A9; BD Biosciences), CCR4 (clone 1G1; BD Biosciences), CD3 (clone UCHT1; BD Biosciences), cutaneous leukocyte antigen (CLA, clone HECA-452; BD Biosciences), CD4 (clone RPA-T4; BD Biosciences), and CXCR3 (clone G025H7; Sony), CD25 (clone bc96; Sony). CLA was added to the panel to visualize skin-homing T cells. Or cells were incubated with the second panel including CD3 (clone UCHT1; BD Biosciences), CD4 (clone SK3; BD Biosciences), CD25 (clone bc96; Sony), CD45RO (clone UCHL1; eBioscience), CD127 (clone hIL-7R-M21;BD Biosciences), and CLA (clone HECA-452; BD Biosciences). Subsequently, dead cells were excluded by incubation with Fixable Viability Dye eFluor506 (eBioscience) for 15 min at 4°C. All incubation steps were performed in the dark. Samples were measured on an LSRFortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed manually using FlowJo v10.7 software (Tree Star Inc. Ashland, OR). Additional file 1A and B depict the manual gating strategy of the two panels.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of Blood Cell Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
100 μl heparinized whole blood was used for quantification of cell populations exactly as described before6 (link) using titered amounts of monoclonal antibodies in saturating concentrations as indicated (see also Table S1). T-cells, B-cells and plasmablasts were quantified using antibodies towards CD3 (clone SK7, final dilution 1:25), CD19 (clone HIB19, 1:40), CD27 (clone L128, 1:200), CD38 (clone HB7, 1:20) and IgD (clone IA6-2, 1:33.3). Expression of CD3 and CD19 was used to identify T and B-cells, respectively, among total lymphocytes. Staining of CD4 (clone SK3, 1:100) and CD8 (clone RPA-T8, 1:100, all antibodies from BD, Heidelberg, Germany) was used to quantify CD4 and CD8 T-cells. Staining of CD38 was used to identify plasmablasts among IgD-CD27+ CD19 positive switched-memory B-cells. Flow-cytometric analyses were performed on a BD FACSLyric instrument and BD FACSuite software v1.4.0.7047. Further data analyses was carried out using FlowJo software 10.6.2 based on a gating strategy as described before.6 (link) Absolute lymphocyte numbers were calculated using differential blood counts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Intracellular Cytokine and PBMC Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For analysis of intracellular cytokines, treated PBMCs were incubated with brefeldin A (Sigma Aldrich; 5 μg/ml) for the last 3 to 4 h of treatment. Afterwards, cells were fixed and permeabilized using the Cytofix/Cytoperm kit (BD Biosciences) and subsequently stained for 40 min with fluorescent antibodies detecting TNF-α (clone MAb11, BioLegend), CD14 (clone RMO52, Beckmann Coulter), and CD4 (clone SK3, BD Biosciences).
To assess the purity of isolated memory T-helper cells, cells were stained with fluorescent antibodies detecting the following cell surface markers as described previously [23 (link), 24 (link)]: CD45RA (clone HI100), CD45RO (clone UCHL1), CD3 (clone SK7), CD4 (clone SK3), CD56 (clone NCAM16.2) (all from BD Biosciences) as well as CD16 (clone 3G8), CD14 (clone RMO52), and CD19 (clone J4.119) (all from Beckmann Coulter).
For analysis of PBMC proliferation, total cell numbers after treatment were assessed by flow cytometry.
For analysis of PBMC apoptosis, treated cells were stained with fluorescent annexin V antibodies and propidium iodide using the Annexin V apoptosis detection kit APC (eBioscience) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Afterwards, the proportion of apoptotic cells (annexin V+ cells) were evaluated.
All data acquisitions and analyses were carried out using a FACSCalibur device and CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!