The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using plan apochromat 63 1.4 na objective

1

Live and Fixed Cell Confocal Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Live cell microscopy was performed with a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal microscope equipped with a Zeiss 63× Plan Apochromat 1.4 NA objective and Zeiss Zen software. ECs grown in glass-bottom dishes were imaged at 5% CO2 and 37°C in phenol-red free Endothelial Growth Medium containing 10% BSA.
Imaging of fixed cells and/or tissue was performed at room temperature with a Zeiss LSM 880 confocal microscope, Zeiss 63× Plan Apochromat, 1.4 NA objective, and Zeiss Zen software unless otherwise specified.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Airyscan Imaging of Expanded Gels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Expanded gels were placed into acrylic chambers with a square cut-out, attached to a no. 1.5 glass coverslip (Menzel Gläser), which had been coated with 0.1% (v/v) poly-l-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich) at room temperature for 30 min. Airyscan imaging was performed on an inverted LSM880 (Carl Zeiss, Jena), with a Plan-Apochromat ×63 1.4 NA objective with a working distance of 0.19 mm. AlexaFluor 488 and AlexaFluor 594 were excited with 488 and 561 nm DPSS lasers, while emission bands were selected using the in-built spectral detector.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

FRAP Analysis of BAG3, P62, and HSP70

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells were transfected with BAG3-GFP wild type or mutant constructs and with either P62-mCherry and mScarlet-HSP70 constructs and imaged 48 hours after transfection in a μ-slide 8-well (80826, Ibidi, Martinsried, Germany) in FluoroBrite DMEM medium (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 4mM L-glutamine at 37 °C and 5% CO2. FRAP measurements were performed on a Zeiss LSM700 laser scanning confocal microscope using a PlanApochromat 63×/1.4 NA objective.
Image sequences (512 ×512 pixels, 117 nm/pixel) were acquired at 1 frame per 3 sec (BAG3-GFP and mScarlet-HSP70 FRAP) or 1 frame per 2 sec (P62-mCherry FRAP) for the duration of the experiments, as indicated in the figures. Three to five pre-bleach sequences preceded photobleaching in a 70 ×70 pixel region at 100% of a 5 mW 488 nm laser (BAG3-GFP FRAP) or 100% of a 10 mW 555 nm (P62-mCherry and mScarlet-HSP70 FRAP) for 2 sec. FRAP sequences were recorded from 6 cells per genotype and intensities in the bleached region were measured with ImageJ54 (link),55 (link) and plotted over time. Imaging and photobleaching settings were kept identical for all wild type and mutant BAG3 cells within the three different FRAP experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative FRAP Analysis of HP1α Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Microscopy was performed using an inverted LSM 700 confocal microscope (Zeiss) and a Plan apochromat × 63/1.4 NA objective. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) bleaching and time-series images were acquired in 150 × 150 pixels with a pixel size of 0.1 μm, 16-bit grayscale depth and a pixel dwell time of 1.58 μs with the pinhole set at 201 μm. A circular spot of 14 pixels (1.4 μm) in diameter was used for bleaching. Five pre-bleach images were acquired before five iterations of a bleaching pulse at 100% laser power used and movies were acquired for 42 s. Photobleaching during the time-series was corrected using the intensity in the bleach region relative to the entire acquisition region. The time-intensity acquisitions were normalized to the pre-bleach intensity and the first image after the bleach pulse. Results were averaged over 17–30 individual FRAP curves for unmodified HP1α and mutants proteins.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescent Tissue Staining Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flash frozen 6 mm biopsy punches were thawed/fixed in ice-cold Carnoy’s buffer (60% MeOH, 30% acetic acid, 10% acetic acid) for 3 h on ice before washing as follows: 2× MeOH washes, 30 min each, 2× ETOH washes, 20 min each, 2× PBS washes, 20 min each. Tissues were then embedded and frozen in OCT media and 5 μm sections were cut and placed on slides for staining. Tissue sections were blocked with 2% donkey serum, 1% BSA, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.05% Tween-20 in PBS, following by staining with the following primary antibodies: mouse anti-cytokeratin clone C-51 (Thermo Fisher, 1:100), rabbit anti-mCherry polyclonal (Thermo Fisher, 1:100), and goat anti-Salmonella CSA-1 (1:100) conjugated to AlexaFluor 488 (Thermo Fisher) per manufacturer’s instructions. Secondary antibodies (1:500) were AlexaFluor 568-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit (Thermo Fisher) and CF®633 conjugated donkey anti-mouse (Biotium). After staining, slides were stained for 10 min with wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) conjugated to CF®405 (Biotium, 1:500), followed by fixation with 2.5% PFA for 10 min. Samples were mounted with ProLong Gold with DAPI (Thermo Fisher). Images were captured using a Zeiss LSM 710 confocal laser-scanning microscope with either a Plan APOCHROMAT ×63/1.4 N.A. objective or a ×20/0.8 N.A. objective.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Live-cell Confocal Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were imaged in DMEM without phenol red but with supplements, including 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4. Transfection and imaging were performed in a 35-mm glass-bottomed microwell dish (MatTek) or glass coverslips. A Zeiss LSM710 or LSM800 confocal laser-scanning microscope was used (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging). Fluorescence emissions resulting from 405-nm excitation for CFP, 488-nm excitation for GFP, and 543-nm excitation for mCherry were detected using filter sets supplied by the manufacturer. The confocal and time-lapse images were captured using a Plan-Apochromat 63× 1.4-NA objective (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging). The temperature on the microscope stage was held stable during time-lapse sessions using an electronic temperature-controlled airstream incubator. Images and videos were generated and analyzed using the Zeiss LSM Zen software and National Institutes of Health Image and ImageJ software (W. Rasband, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). High-frequency images were captured using a Nikon Ti microscope equipped with a Yokogawa CSU X-1 spinning disc, controlled by Andor IQ2 software, or a spinning disk confocal unit (Yokogawa Electric; CSU-X1) attached to an Axio Observer Z1 microscope (Carl Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Visualizing AChR Cluster Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To monitor AChR cluster stability, differentiated myotubes adhering to EHS laminin (Sigma-Aldrich)–coated dishes (Ibidi, Munich, Germany) were exposed to agrin (16 h), washed twice in fusion medium without agrin, and labeled (in sequence) with biotin–α-BTX and Rhodamine Red–streptavidin (30 min, 37°C each). After labeling, cells were subjected to time-lapse microscopy using a Zeiss LSM710 confocal microscope equipped with a heated stage (37°C) and constant 5% CO2 flow and a Plan-Apochromat 63×/1.4 NA objective lens. Images were taken at 15-s intervals during 1- to 2-h recordings using the Time Series tool (ZEN 2009). To monitor AChR mobility after inducing IF collapse, 0.1 μg/ml OA or 1 μM WFA was added to the growth medium before recording. Mobility of individual clusters was traced using the Manual Tracking plug-in from the ImageJ software. Alexa 488–α-BTX–labeled AChRs were monitored in a similar way at 2-h intervals during a 10-h period after agrin withdrawal. For monitoring cluster formation in AChRε-GFP–transfected myotubes, GFP-positive signals were recorded after addition of agrin, and frames were taken at 2-s intervals for up to 1 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Confocal Imaging of FITC-Dextran Uptake

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RBL cells were seeded at 2 × 105 cells/chamber in eight-well chamber borosilicate coverglass systems (Thermo Fisher Scientific Waltham, MA). Cells were loaded with 1 mg/ml of FITC-dextran for 48 h. Images were acquired by a Leica Sp5 laser scanning confocal microscope, equipped with a heated chamber (37 °C) and CO2 controller (4.8%) and a C-Apochromat 363/1.2 W Corr objective or using a Zeiss LSM Pascal confocal microscope using a Plan-apochromat 63° – NA 1.4 objective (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging) or Zeiss LSM 800 microscope. Image capture was performed using the standard time-series option (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging). Images and videos were generated and analyzed using the Zeiss LSM software and ImageJ software (W. Rasband, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Long time-lapse image sequences were captured using the autofocusing function.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cell Attachment and Imaging Optimization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PBLs were cytospun onto poly-L-lysine (Sigma-Aldrich)-treated coverslips for 5 min at 500 × g to optimize cell attachment and cytoplasmic spread. DCs were seeded onto collagen-treated coverslips to minimize autofluorescence. Imaging was performed using a Zen 2012 LSM700 and LSM780 confocal microscopes (Zeiss) with a Plan-Apochromat 63×/NA 1.4 objective. Duolink proximity ligation assay (PLA) was performed according to manufacturer’s instructions (Olink Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!