The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ultrasonic liquid processor

Manufactured by Bioventus
Sourced in United States

The Ultrasonic Liquid Processor is a laboratory instrument designed to disperse, homogenize, and emulsify liquids through the application of high-frequency sound waves. It generates mechanical vibrations that create cavitation and acoustic streaming within the liquid sample, enabling effective mixing and particle size reduction.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using ultrasonic liquid processor

1

Growth Rate Profiling of DAmP Yeast Strains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DAmP strains were diluted 1:100 from stock plates into new plates and grown for 48 h. These saturated cultures were then diluted 1:200 into new plates, and cell density was measured for the four strains with the highest reported growth rates every 2 h. After 8 h of growth (or earlier if any one of the fastest growing strains exceeded a density of 5 × 106 cells/ml), cells were harvested and fixed in PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde (100 μl/well) for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were washed twice with PBS (200 μl/well) and then stained with a solution of 20 μg/ml FITC-conjugated concanavalin A (MP Biomedicals, 75 μl/well) for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. Cells were washed twice with PBS, resuspended in PBS (typically 150 μl/well), and stored at 4°C for up to 1 week. Cells were gently sonicated using a Misonix ultrasonic liquid processor with a 96-probe tip set at amplitude 10 with 10 1-s pulses immediately before mounting.
For each plate, 5 ml of mounting media was prepared by mixing 2.5 ml VectaShield, 2 ml PBS, and 500 μl DAPI (1 μg/ml). 50 μl of mounting media was added to each well of a glass-bottom 96-well plate (Matrical). 50 μl freshly sonicated cell suspension was then added to each well and mixed thoroughly. These plates were centrifuged at 689 × g for 2 min prior to imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Preparation and Characterization of Ace-DEX AR-12 Microparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ace-DEX AR-12/MPs were formulated as previously described (Hoang et al., 2014 (link)). To prevent endotoxin contamination, all dishes and glassware were soaked in 0.5 M sodium hydroxide overnight, washed with isopropanol, and dried before use. Ace-DEX was combined with AR-12 (2% wt/wt) and dissolved in dichloromethane (DCM). To this solution, polyvinyl alcohol (87– 89% hydrolyzed) (PVA) (3% wt/wt) in phosphate buffer saline (PBS, pH 7.4) was added and the mixture sonicated on ice using a Misonix Ultrasonic Liquid Processor (Farmingdale, NY; 60 W, duty cycle 50%). The emulsion was placed in 0.3% PVA in PBS and stirred for 3 h to evaporate the organic solvent. To remove un-encapsulated AR-12, the solution was filtered using a sterile Midi Kros tangential flow filtration system (Spectrum Labs., Rancho Dominguez, CA). The particles were collected, frozen and lyophilized. To create empty MPs, the same procedure was used without the addition of AR-12. Prior to use, both AR-12/MPs and empty MPs were confirmed to have endotoxin levels below FDA guidelines (0.25 endotoxin units per milliliter) by a ToxinSensor™ Chromogenic LAL Endotoxin Assay Kit (GenScript USA Inc, Piscataway, NJ), performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantification of Hydroxyproline in Heart Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ten microgram of frozen heart tissue was diluted in 100 μl nuclease free water and homogenized using the MISONIX ultrasonic liquid processor and transferred to a pressure-safe pyrex glass tube. The same amount of 37% HCl was added to the samples, which were then heated at 120°C for 3 h. For each assay, 10 μl of sample was transferred to a 96-well plate and evaporated at 60°C to dryness. Chloramine T (55 mM chloramine T), 10% 2-propanol in acetate citrate buffer (0.8M sodium acetate trihydrate, 240 mM citric acid, 1.2% glacial acetic acid, 850 mM NaOH in 1 l ddH2O) and Ehrlich's reagent [10 mM p-dimethylaminobenzaldehyde in 2-propanol/perchloric acid (2:1 v/v)] were added and the absorbance at 560 nm was measured with Infinite M1000 (Tecan). The amount of hydroxyproline was calculated with the help of a hydroxyproline standard (Sigma-Aldrich).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Preparation and Characterization of ZnO Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The OECD-sponsored ZnO-NPs used in this study, Z-COTE (uncoated) and Z-COTE HP1 (coated with triethoxycaprylylsilane), are commercially available from BASF (Mississauga, Canada). Fine ZnO (bulk control particles, micro-sized) and zinc chloride (ZnCl2, a soluble zinc compound) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Oakville, Canada). ZnO suspensions and dispersions were prepared in deionized water of liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry application grade (LC/MS water, Fisher Scientific, Burlington, Canada) for primary particle analysis. Z-COTE, Z-COTE HP1, or fine-ZnO in powder form were transferred into sterile zinc-free glass tube with caps. Conditions for sonication were optimized for various times and power settings. Sonication was routinely performed with an Ultrasonic Liquid Processor (MISONIX, New York, USA) for 15 min at 30 % amplitude in a water bath while continuously cooling the samples with ice during sonication. The final energy was 76,148 J, and the power was 75–85 W. All stock dispersions were adjusted to a final concentration of 100 µg/mL, and then further diluted in either LS/MS water or appropriate medium to the desired concentration. Working dilutions were used freshly.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Synthesis of Zwitterionic Magnetic Fluorescent Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The solution of 0.6 mg MnFe2O4 MNPs and 2.4 mg CuInS2/ZnS QDs in THF (900 µL) and 1.7 mg PMAO-CBSB in CHCl3-MeOH (~ 50 µL) was layered on top of cold water in a glass vial. The mixture was ultrasonicated using the Misonix Ultrasonic Liquid Processor with a 5 W output power for 1 min. After sonication, the organic solvents were removed by rotary evaporation at room temperature and the sample filtered through a 0.2 µm syringe filter. Empty micelles or single-nanoparticle based micelles were removed by centrifugation at 18,000 rpm for 25 min (twice). The collected ZW-MFNPs were dispersed in 400 µL of water, and stored at 4°C until further use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Carotenoid Extraction and Spectrophotometric Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the carotenoid determination, the spectrophotometric analysis was carried out after extraction [22 (link)]. The analyses were carried out in darkness to prevent carotenoid degradation and isomerisation. Before chemical extraction, leaves were homogenised in a blender and an aliquot of 5 g of the sample was weighed into a 50 mL amber coloured flask wrapped with aluminium foil. Then, 100 mL of the solvent mix (hexane/acetone/methanol 2:1:1 v/v/v) was added to the flask and sonicated continuously for 10 min (Misonix Ultrasonic Liquid Processor, Misonix, Inc. 1938, New Highway, Farmingdale, NY, USA).
The extraction was repeated until the sample became colorless. The combined extract was transferred to a separating funnel and 5 mL of distilled water was added to separate polar and nonpolar phases. The nonpolar hexane layer containing carotenoids was collected and concentrated in a rotary evaporator (Heidolph, Schwabach, Germany) until dry. The residue was dissolved in 10 mL of hexane. The total carotenoid content was determined by a spectrophotometric method using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Agilent 8453 Technologies, Agilent, Milan, Italy). The absorbance was read at 450 nm. All analyses were performed in triplicate and the results were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
The results were expressed as g β-carotene/100 g fresh weight of sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Ultrasonic Processing of Pomegranate Juice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An ultrasonic liquid processor (Misonix, Inc., New York, USA) supplied with a 19 mm diameter probe, amplitude levels of 24.4–61 µm, at constant frequency of 20 kHz was used to sonicate the 100 mL pomegranate juices. Ultrasonic treatment was carried out in a 150 mL double wall cylindrical vessel pyrex glass with 60 mm inner diameter, 80mm outer diameter, 65 mm outer height and 55 mm inner height connected to a recirculating refrigerated water bath (Cooling thermostat: Lauda Alpha RA 8, Lauda-Königshofen, Germany) to attain a constant temperature in the juice sample during sonication. Ethylene glycol (2°C according to amplitude levels) with flow rate of 0.5 L/min was used as the refrigerant to remove the heat generated during sonication to maintain sample temperature constant at 25 ± 1 °C. The ultrasound probe was submerged to a depth of 25 mm in the pomegranate juice to constantly sonicate at various wave amplitudes of 50, 75 and 100% and times of 0, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15 min. For microbial studies, the inoculated pomegranate juices (100 mL) were sonicated in a 150 mL cylindrical vessel under the conditions described at the sub lethal temperature (25°C). The samples were recovered at the exit of the ultrasonic cell, poured into sterile glass tubes; the tubes were immediately immersed into and kept in an ice bath until survivor enumerations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Purification of Recombinant NEDD8 Pathway Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BL21(DE3) Escherichia coli cells were transformed with pET28 vectors encoding NEDD8, APPBP1, UBA3, Ubc12, their mutants, and fluorescent protein-labeled versions. The transformed bacteria cells were plated on LB agar plates containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin, and single colony cultures were inoculated in 2xYT medium. The expression of poly-histidine-tagged recombinant proteins was induced with 0.2 mM IPTG at 25 °C overnight. Bacterial cells were collected by centrifugation at 8,000 rpm 5 min, resuspended in buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 500 mM NaCl and 5 mM imidazole, and sonicated with an ultrasonic liquid processor (Misonix, Farmingdale, NY). Cell lysate containing recombinant proteins was cleared by centrifugation at 35,000 g for 30 min. The recombinant proteins were then bound to Ni2+-NTA agarose beads (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA) and eluted with buffer containing 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl, and 150 mM imidazole. Then the proteins were dialyzed into a buffer of 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, and 1 mM DTT. SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining confirmed the purity of the proteins. Protein concentrations were determined using Coomassie Plus Protein Assay (Pierce) and concentrations of fluorescent-tagged proteins were determined using fluorescent protein concentration standard curves.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Synthesis and Characterization of Lipid Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Vesicles with different compositions were synthesized according to established protocols.36 (link) Glass vials and glass syringes were washed three times with Milli-Q water, ethanol (100%, Fisher Scientific, USA) and chloroform (Fisher Scientific, USA) before use. Lipids (Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc, USA) were added into the cleaned glass vial by the glass syringe and dried under vacuum overnight. The glass vial was wrapped with alumina foil with a small hole on the top. Upon drying, the formed film on the glass vial was dissolved with 200 μL of 50 mM tris buffered saline (pH 8.0). The synthesized vesicle was diluted to designated concentrations and sonicated by an ultrasonic liquid processor (Misonix, USA) for 2 min (amplitude: 10%, process time: 2 s, and quiet time: 4 s).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Synthesis of Magnetic Fluorescent Nanocomposites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The solution of MnFe2O4 MNPs, CuInS2/ZnS QDs, and PEG-PLGA in THF was layered on the top of cold water in a glass vial. The mixture was ultrasonicated using the Misonix Ultrasonic Liquid Processor with a 3 W output power for 1 min. After sonication, THF was removed by rotary evaporation at room temperature and the sample filtered through a 0.2 μm syringe filter to remove big aggregates. Empty micelles or single-nanoparticle based micelles were removed by centrifugation at 18,000 rpm for 25 min (twice). The collected MFNCs were then re-filtered through 0.2 μm syringe filter, concentrated using a centrifugal filter, dispersed in 600 μL of water, and stored at 4°C until further use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!