The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Version 10

Manufactured by MedCalc
Sourced in Belgium, United States

MedCalc version 10.2.0.0 is a software application designed for medical and scientific calculations. It provides a platform for performing various statistical and analytical tasks related to medical and clinical data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

33 protocols using version 10

1

CDI Assay Implementation and Perceptions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In April 2018, about 50 questions on the current status of CDI assays and details on implementation and perceptions were written, and a survey questionnaire was administered to laboratory medicine specialists in 200 institutions in Korea. The contents of questions in details were described in Table 1. Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) and MedCalc version 10.0 (MedCalc Software bvba, Ostend, Belgium). Continuous variables were compared using t-test and Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test or χ2 test, as appropriate. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

OCTA Vessel Density in Glaucoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The assumption of data normality was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. The Student's t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare continuous data. One-way analysis of variance test was used for comparison of OCTA vessel density and OCT measurements among the normal control, mild, and moderate-to-severe glaucoma group. Multiple comparisons with Bonferroni adjustments were used for pairwise comparisons. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The Pearson-Spearman correlation test was used to investigate the correlation between the VF parameters and the vessel density of each layer. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to describe the ability of vessel density obtained from OCTA to differentiate glaucoma from normal controls. Area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was calculated to assess the diagnostic accuracy of each measurement. An AUROC of 1.0 represented perfect discrimination, whereas an AUROC of 0.5 represented chance discrimination. The method described by DeLong et al.15 (link) was applied to compare the AUROCs. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS for Windows 21.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) and Medcalc version 10.0 (Medcalc Software; Ostend, Mariakerke, Belgium).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Diagnosing Cerebral Hemorrhage with DECT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used statistical software for biomedical research (MedCalc®, version 10.0, Mariakerke, Belgium). Cohen›s kappa test was used to estimate inter-rater agreement. We then calculated sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value as well as the accuracy of DECT in diagnosing cerebral hemorrhage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

ECMO Circuit Signal Intensity Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Contrast signal intensity for each view, pre and post, the ECMO circuit was expressed as mean ± one standard deviation. Comparison between the continuous variables was performed using the paired Student’s t test for pre- versus post-circuit analysis and unpaired Student’s t test for full circuit versus no oxygenator comparison. A p value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using MedCalc version 10.0 (Mariakerke, Belgium).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of Pre-During-Post Intervention

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 23.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL). Data normality was tested using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Group comparisons for the normally distributed data were performed with the Student t test considering the different time points (“pre”, “during” and “post”), whereas the non-normally distributed variables were examined with the Wilcoxon signed rank test with 2 related samples. The bivariate correlation analysis for non-normally distributed data were analysed using the Spearman test. A guide to interpreting the correlation strength was derived from the recommendations of Navarro50 . A p value of 0.05 was taken to be statistically significant. The sample size was calculated using MedCalc version 10.0 (MedCalc, Ostend, Mariakerke, Belgium). The minimum sample size requirement for a t-test with an alpha level of 0.05, and a power of 0.8, was calculated to be a minimum of 21 patients. Finally, a bivariate regression was performed across all metrics included examining any influences between an explanatory variable and an outcome variable.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Continuous Variable Comparison Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Continuous variables are expressed as mean ± one standard deviation. Comparison between the continuous variables was performed using a paired t test. Inter-observer variability was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). A P value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed using MedCalc version 10.0 (Mariakerke, Belgium).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Diagnostic Performance of DWI Rim Sign

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ADCmean values were compared for benign, high-risk, and malignant lesions using Student’s t-test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the optimal ADCmean thresholds for discriminating between benign and malignant lesions. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated for the DWI rim sign based on the individual reviewers and consensus result and compared with those results of the mean of ADCmean value to assess diagnostic performance (20 (link)).
McNemar’s test of proportions was used to compare the rim signs between CE-MRI and DWI and between the DWI rim signs and the high-signal rims on T2-weighted images. P < 0.05 was considered significant.
The ADCmean values of the lesions with rim signs and the lesions without rim signs for all reviewers were compared using Student’s t-test. Additionally, the ADCmean values of the whole lesion, the rim signal area, and the area excluding the rim signal were compared using Student’s t-test.
MedCalc version 10.4.0.0 (MedCalc Software, Mariakerke, Belgium) was used for the statistical and ROC analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Galectin-3 Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As galectin-3 relative expression values were not normally distributed tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, whereas non-parametrical statistical tests were used for comparison between groups regarding galectin-3 expression: Mann-Whitney U test for two groups and Kruskal-Wallis test for more than two groups. When the Kruskal-Wallis test (p<0.05) was positive, post-hoc analysis with a test for pairwise comparison of subgroups was performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the cutoff value for galectin-3 relative expression in discriminating between benign and malignant samples,. All samples with values above the cutoff value were regarded as positive. MedCalc version 10.4.0.0 (MedCalc Software bvba, Mariakerke, Belgium) was used, and a p value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Detection ELISA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In total, 70 sera samples (40 negative and 30 positive) were used for preliminary ELISA assay validation. Statistical analyses were carried out using MedCalc version 10.4.0.0 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium) [33 (link),34 (link)]. Sensitivity was defined as the proportion of correctly identified COVID-19 positive patients who were initially positive by RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 determination in respiratory samples. Specificity was defined as the proportion of naive participants classified as positive as analyzed by ELISA SARS-CoV-2 M protein-specific antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Albuminuria Prognostic Factors Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Normality of data distribution was tested using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Comparison between groups was performed using the Student t-test for normally distributed variables, and Mann-Whitney U-test for not normally distributed variables. The Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the correlation between numerical variables. MedCalc version 10.4.0.0 (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium) was used for the analysis. The simultaneous relationship of multiple prognostic factors with high-normal albuminuria as well as with microalbuminuria was determined using the multiple logistic regression model with a stepwise selection of the significant prognostic variables. Data are presented as the mean±SD. All tests were two-sided. A P-value of ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!